Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Rip off the bandaid now or slowly bleed out? >

Rip off the bandaid now or slowly bleed out?

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Rip off the bandaid now or slowly bleed out?

Old 03-30-2020, 07:34 AM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,190
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER View Post
Where are you getting this nonsense from?
No this is a real concern. If your employer doesn't need cash NOW, they might take a longer-term view.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-30-2020, 07:35 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 638
Default

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield View Post
I'm not taking a position either way, but it does seem foolish to spend 25 billion to just delay the inevitable. We're all flying around empty airplanes and losing money on every flight. At some point, we need to realize that it isn't sustainable, right?
I think the 4 months is to stabilize them through this ridiculously slow time for the industry. They probably would not of been able to make it out the other side of this virus lockdown otherwise. The real question is what is the travel industry going to look like in October? I'm betting that's where the fleet/manpower planning folks are earning their keep right now. They'll come up with their best plan of action and then make their recommendations to the execs. My guess is the rest of the 4 months will be gearing up for that day through displacement bids and training while everything is shut down. That way October 1st they'll be ready to go with whatever the long term plan is.

To add: airlines with simple fleet plans have a much easier task ahead. Frontier, Spirit, Southwest and even JetBlue or Alaska might decide its just easier to not take the money and go their own way. That money is coming with some onerous terms for management and just like Ford in 2008 decide its just easier if they don't strap themselves to Uncle Sam.
iPilot is offline  
Old 03-30-2020, 07:46 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Posts: 6,600
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
No this is a real concern. If your employer doesn't need cash NOW, they might take a longer-term view.
Now I’m no SWA cheerleader (and that’s a gross understatement), but I’d be shocked if they went for furloughs instead of the grants. It would utterly destroy employee moral and what the Kompany has stood for.

Again, not impossible but personally I can’t wrap my mind around furloughs over grant money. Now furloughs after September......definitely a good possibility.
WHACKMASTER is offline  
Old 03-30-2020, 07:51 AM
  #14  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,190
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER View Post
Now I’m no SWA cheerleader (and that’s a gross understatement), but I’d be shocked if they went for furloughs instead of the grants. It would utterly destroy employee moral and what the Kompany has stood for.

Again, not impossible but personally I can’t wrap my mind around furloughs over grant money. Now furloughs after September......definitely a good possibility.
I agree they really don't want to go there, but what if furloughs leaves them $2B in cash on 01 Oct and grants + no furloughs leave them $0.8B?

I think it comes down to how much of the pie each carrier will be allocated. Don't know if that will be based on a fixed metric like ASM's, or if it will be need based. If it's the later I suspect some furloughs might happen at non-big-three majors.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-30-2020, 07:57 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 659
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I agree they really don't want to go there, but what if furloughs leaves them $2B in cash on 01 Oct and grants + no furloughs leave them $0.8B?

I think it comes down to how much of the pie each carrier will be allocated. Don't know if that will be based on a fixed metric like ASM's, or if it will be need based. If it's the later I suspect some furloughs might happen at non-big-three majors.
The grants are the payroll from the same period last year
Peacock is offline  
Old 03-30-2020, 08:16 AM
  #16  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,190
Default

Originally Posted by Peacock View Post
The grants are the payroll from the same period last year
Is that in the law, or policy from Treasury? Also know if that includes the cost of bennies?

Last edited by rickair7777; 03-30-2020 at 08:26 AM.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-30-2020, 08:41 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flubber's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Upside down, in the weeds and on fire
Posts: 237
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Is that in the law, or policy from Treasury? Also know if that includes the cost of bennies?
It's in the language: salary and benefits, based on the amounts paid to employees 4/1/2019 thru 9/30/2019.
Flubber is offline  
Old 03-30-2020, 08:57 AM
  #18  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,190
Default

Originally Posted by Flubber View Post
It's in the language: salary and benefits, based on the amounts paid to employees 4/1/2019 thru 9/30/2019.
OK, I didn't look hard enough. If that's what it is then everybody should take the grant unless they have some weird circumstance.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-30-2020, 08:58 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 192
Default

Originally Posted by Peacock View Post
The grants are the payroll from the same period last year
too bad my airline grew significantly since then and our payroll costs are much higher
SAABoroowski is offline  
Old 03-30-2020, 09:05 AM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2020
Posts: 25
Default

Originally Posted by SAABoroowski View Post
too bad my airline grew significantly since then and our payroll costs are much higher
At least the lack of open time and premiums as well as overtime in other positions will be way lower or nonexistent this year and reduced lines will stretch it a bit further for pretty much all carriers. Even with growth I think payroll costs could be lower.
stevo22 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices