Yet another threat to international flying...
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 261
There was a reason the ULCC revolution started in Euroland.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 261
No, the airports are privatized in Europe (they might have a 50 year lease or something). We run them publicly here. Considering the respective politics you'd think that situation would be reversed.
"Letting airports go bankrupt" in Europe just means letting the private companies that manage the airports put themselves through the financial reorganization process rather than bail a private company out with public funds.
Here is an article advocating for the same thing here (in a liberal publication no less!)
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...rports/615331/
"Letting airports go bankrupt" in Europe just means letting the private companies that manage the airports put themselves through the financial reorganization process rather than bail a private company out with public funds.
Here is an article advocating for the same thing here (in a liberal publication no less!)
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...rports/615331/
#13
Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk
#14
https://www.freightwaves.com/news/wh...ight-transport
https://trforum.org/wp-content/uploa...htRailways.pdf
an excerpt:
PRODUCTIVITY
To move the same number of tons, around seven times more trains are necessary in Europe. For a thousand tons the U.S. Class I railroads require 0.28 trains; in Europe it is 1.94 (Figure 2). Even taking into account the higher costs of the larger U.S. trains, this is a very significant distinction that implies that European railways have much higher costs per ton and tkm, which is the case. As shown in Figure 3, the operational revenues per ton-mile are higher in Europe, almost two times more than in the U.S. (DB Shenker, being the largest European freight railway, will be used in the comparison, and data for CP Carga the main Portuguese freight railway are also presented). But the operational expenses are almost four times higher than the ones in the U.S. In fact, European railways are barely profitable or not profitable at all (European Commission 2009b).
JTRF Volume 52 No. 2, Summer 2013
To move the same number of tons, around seven times more trains are necessary in Europe. For a thousand tons the U.S. Class I railroads require 0.28 trains; in Europe it is 1.94 (Figure 2). Even taking into account the higher costs of the larger U.S. trains, this is a very significant distinction that implies that European railways have much higher costs per ton and tkm, which is the case. As shown in Figure 3, the operational revenues per ton-mile are higher in Europe, almost two times more than in the U.S. (DB Shenker, being the largest European freight railway, will be used in the comparison, and data for CP Carga the main Portuguese freight railway are also presented). But the operational expenses are almost four times higher than the ones in the U.S. In fact, European railways are barely profitable or not profitable at all (European Commission 2009b).
JTRF Volume 52 No. 2, Summer 2013
#15
Trains get good fuel economy in the US because a very long train can get moving, and then go maybe 1,000 miles without hardly touching the throttle, especially in the west. Can't do that in Europe, or any other densely populated area. Stop n' go wastes a lot of energy.
#16
*except for US N-S east coast pax rail - missed opportunity there imo
#17
Trains get good fuel economy in the US because a very long train can get moving, and then go maybe 1,000 miles without hardly touching the throttle, especially in the west. Can't do that in Europe, or any other densely populated area. Stop n' go wastes a lot of energy.
#18
Predicting 2023 to 2024 before normal...
...return to international flying....
https://www.jpost.com/health-science...eration-657898
https://www.jpost.com/health-science...eration-657898
A report recently published by the Economist Intelligence Unit, the research and analysis division of The Economist Group, explained that whereas the rollout of vaccines against coronavirus has started in developed countries, mass vaccination will take time.
The unit predicts that the bulk of the adult population in advanced economies will have been vaccinated by mid-2022. Middle-income countries will take until late 2022 or early 2023.
“For poorer economies, mass immunization will take until 2024, if it happens at all,” the report said.
The unit predicts that the bulk of the adult population in advanced economies will have been vaccinated by mid-2022. Middle-income countries will take until late 2022 or early 2023.
“For poorer economies, mass immunization will take until 2024, if it happens at all,” the report said.
Last edited by Excargodog; 02-05-2021 at 03:17 PM.
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,285
Having lived in Germany, air travel In most of Europe was not a huge thing. The countries are often almost postage stamp-sized. On three day weekends it wasn’t uncommon for MWR to offer bus tours, leaving Friday night and getting back Sunday evening. Seven countries in three days. I’ve been in Lichtenstein when there wasn’t a parking place in the entire country, the whole 62 square miles of it. Don’t know where they would put an airport if they wanted one. I think they do have one helipad though...
Short haul EU 'domestic' flying is much more competitive than the USA. Europe isn't Cold War 1980's anymore. Air travel trends there lead the USA by about a decade.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Per the Ryanair Group Investor Relations page, after muddling through their charts - which are mislabeled badly - and after adding up their month to month numbers, they actually carried 52.01 million passengers in 2020.
Don't believe my numbers? well, another article about Ryanair's 2020 performance come to the same year end figure - 52.1million passengers, as compared to their 2019 number of 152.4 million passengers.
A quote within the article, just before the actual passenger numbers chart: "Those December figures round out a terrible year for Ryanair, during which passenger levels fell by two-thirds, to 52.1 million, down from 152.4 million in 2019."
https://www.flightglobal.com/network...141822.article
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post