Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

Welcome to Airline Pilot Forums - Connect and get the inside scoop on Airline Companies

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. Join our community today and start interacting with existing members. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free.


User Tag List

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2020, 08:15 AM   #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 29,062
Default

rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-03-2020, 08:15 AM   #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Left Handed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 319/320/321...whatever it takes.
Posts: 491
Default

Guys, read the whole rule. It doesn’t say anything about disallowing pets in the cabin. All it says is you can’t call an animal an “emotional support animal” (ie:free) any more unless it specifically has been trained as a service animal, and even that is limited to non-violent dogs. The airline’s pet carriage policies are not changed. You can still pay to have pets in the cabin.
Left Handed is offline  
Old 12-03-2020, 08:18 AM   #13  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 29,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Left Handed View Post
Guys, read the whole rule. It doesn’t say anything about disallowing pets in the cabin. All it says is you can’t call an animal an “emotional support animal” (ie:free) any more unless it specifically has been trained as a service animal, and even that is limited to non-violent dogs. The airline’s pet carriage policies are not changed. You can still pay to have pets in the cabin.
Yes, and this is GREAT.

It lets the airlines set reasonable rules for pets in the cabin, without the ESA loophole that you could drive a supertanker through.

Most airlines allow only small pets that fit (and stay) in a carry-on size pet carrier. I don't really care if they bring a tasmanian devil as long as it's in a container.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-03-2020, 09:48 AM   #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 3,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Left Handed View Post
Guys, read the whole rule. It doesn’t say anything about disallowing pets in the cabin. All it says is you can’t call an animal an “emotional support animal” (ie:free) any more unless it specifically has been trained as a service animal, and even that is limited to non-violent dogs. The airline’s pet carriage policies are not changed. You can still pay to have pets in the cabin.
The FAA doesn't tell certificate holders what they can't carry, except for the rules surrounding hazmat. If airline A wants to make money transporting snakes on a plane, more power to them.

The new DOT rule aligns Part 382 with 121 and 135 cargo carrying regulations. Previously, although airlines didn't have to carry cargo that could not be secured, they didn't equip check in and gate agents or flight attendants to deal with all the animals people tried to bring onto the plane. All to often they would bend over (the airlines) for fear of being sued or because they let an animal and person get on board that should never have gotten that far. Then you have to remove someone from a flight that never should have gotten there, because their animal can't be secured. Now with 382 aligning with FAA cargo carrying requirements, the airlines have the backing to enforce the cargo-carrying rules on the passengers.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 12-05-2020, 04:38 PM   #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
highfarfast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,729
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CincoDeMayo View Post
So?

Sorry to be so direct but, So? The airline doesn’t want to accept the liability of transporting your dog in the cargo bin and pets don’t belong in the airline cabin.

People don’t pretend it’s an emotional support animal because of the lack of “cargo” option, they did it to not pay to bring the animal as a carry on pet and because putting an animal in the cargo compartment is borderline cruel.

There are airlines who will transport a pet in cargo, people can use them. I doubt Frontier wants to spend the money to have someone driving around the ramp collecting dogs in crates on the ramp, once DGS puts them down on the ramp, in the sun, under the loud APU.
I agree with this except the borderline cruel part. It IS absolutely cruel.

People, don’t put your pets in cargo.

Additionally, taking pets to airport terminal is extremely rude. It’s one thing if it’s really necessary because you need an SERVICE animal. Service animals are not pets. We aren’t talking about that. But emotional support? Common. Not only are there people that don’t like animals (and even fear them) but there are people with real allergen issues. You’re requiring those people to tolerate your pet. And the pet itself? Where is it going to relieve itself? Even not considering that, you don’t think it’s stressed?

People, don’t put your pets on airplanes.

Drive if you really must take your pets with you.

Yes. The rest of us are judging you.

PS: We’ve had pets all our lives. We love animals. Almost all of the ones we’ve had have been rescue and they make up an important part of our family. They do not travel with us by air.


OK. Off soap box.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 12-05-2020, 06:06 PM   #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dougdrvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: retired
Posts: 945
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Yes, and this is GREAT.

It lets the airlines set reasonable rules for pets in the cabin, without the ESA loophole that you could drive a supertanker through.

Most airlines allow only small pets that fit (and stay) in a carry-on size pet carrier. I don't really care if they bring a tasmanian devil as long as it's in a container.
I had a Tasmanian devil and, good lord, I went through a lot of pet carriers.
Dougdrvr is offline  
Old 12-05-2020, 08:45 PM   #17  
Gets Mon-Sun Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Up Front
Posts: 3,146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dougdrvr View Post
I had a Tasmanian devil and, good lord, I went through a lot of pet carriers.
I went through a lot of band aids when people have asked if they could pet my emotional support porcupine.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 12-05-2020, 10:17 PM   #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CA1900's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes View Post
It probably won't win, but I'd expect the miniature-horse service-animal community to put forth some lawsuits...
No doubt. The feds decided we needed to rubber-band our logbooks to the plane so they wouldn't somehow become a projectile, but an unsecured horse in the cabin is (well, was) totally fine.
CA1900 is offline  
Old 12-06-2020, 02:21 AM   #19  
Line Holder
 
arizatonya's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firefighterplt View Post
Just sneak it on the plane. In your stomach.
Here comes the Chinese dude
arizatonya is offline  
Old 12-06-2020, 06:51 AM   #20  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 29,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CA1900 View Post
No doubt. The feds decided we needed to rubber-band our logbooks to the plane so they wouldn't somehow become a projectile, but an unsecured horse in the cabin is (well, was) totally fine.
In fairness, the part of the fed that allowed horses was not the FAA. ADA should never have been allowed to intrude on the FAA's turf. If OSHA jurisdiction ends at the jetway, why do random, ill-conceived ADA edicts apply?
rickair7777 is offline  
 
 
 

 
Post Reply
 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fine. Let the FEDS cover the liability Excargodog Major 13 08-12-2019 03:43 AM
Emotional Support Animals rickair7777 Major 89 09-19-2018 03:03 PM
PAX told to flush emotional support hamster: SonicFlyer Spirit 20 02-10-2018 12:57 PM
Support a rewrite of part 135 duty & rest! Jetlife Part 135 3 04-14-2016 04:12 AM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:56 PM.