Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Aviation Technology
Aviation Carbon Emissions Progress >

Aviation Carbon Emissions Progress

Notices
Aviation Technology New, advanced, and future aviation technology discussion

Aviation Carbon Emissions Progress

Old 12-11-2020, 09:03 AM
  #1  
Prime Minister/Moderator
Thread Starter
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,097
Default Aviation Carbon Emissions Progress

*** Not expressing an opinion on global warming, not need to debate the science on that here. What we are confronting is a political reality, and this is one of those times where the perception IS the reality and our industry must reduce carbon emissions significantly, regardless as to the science either way ***

SAF (sustaniable aviation fuel) has been the obvious near-term mitigation for transport category aircraft, and numerous airlines are doing very small-scale demonstrations.

Carbon capture has always been a theoretical mitigation, since the underlying root of the problem is that we dig up carbon buried in geological formations, aka fossil fuels, and when the fuel is burned that carbon ends up in the atmosphere. Carbon capture pulls CO2 right out of the atmosphere and converts it to an inert compound which can be safely stored... typically back underground where it came from.

UAL has committed to operate the first industrial-scale carbon-capture system, as their path to carbon-zero by 2050. It's comforting to see the industry starting to address this on a large scale... before somebody addresses it for us, in a manner we're not going to like.

Carbon-capture has tremendous potential beyond aviation. Many sectors can practically reduce emissions to near zero at a specific point, such as the automotive industry using batteries to eliminate direct emissions from the operation of vehicles. But that doesn't account for carbon costs associated with industrial processes (ie mfg the vehicle) and power generation, etc... basically life in general. Ag processes emit carbon, especially livestock.

Carbon-capture could readily counter-act the carbon impact of those processes (industrial, ag, and biological) which cannot practically achieve carbon-zero, or even get close in some cases. Even better, it could actually reverse the carbon build-up if necessary, and employed on a large enough scale (probably need nuclear reactors to power that much carbon capture).

https://www.reuters.com/article/unit...-idUSL1N2IQ05W
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-11-2020, 09:52 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,384
Default

I know that there's a ton of interest and excitement around carbon capture. I don't know how it works but it seems like you would need an absolutely massive amount of harvesting equipment to try and pull a not insignificant amount of carbon out of the air. But, maybe this is the golden ticket to bring able to continue motoring around the globe forever.

If we can't even build clean coal power plants, can we really make this work? if it's too difficult to capture the emissions coming out of a power plant, how the heck is this going to work?

I hope I'm wrong.
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 06:16 AM
  #3  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,406
Default

Until the environmentalists become rational enough to consider fission and fusion power, there is little sense in trying to humor them. As long as they persist in being Gaia religious nuts there is no satisfying them and it’s a waste of money to try.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 07:11 AM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
Thread Starter
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,097
Default

Originally Posted by Aero1900 View Post
I know that there's a ton of interest and excitement around carbon capture. I don't know how it works but it seems like you would need an absolutely massive amount of harvesting equipment to try and pull a not insignificant amount of carbon out of the air. But, maybe this is the golden ticket to bring able to continue motoring around the globe forever.

If we can't even build clean coal power plants, can we really make this work? if it's too difficult to capture the emissions coming out of a power plant, how the heck is this going to work?

I hope I'm wrong.
It's not hard to capture from air, and it's easy to scale up. Does use some significant energy, which is why nuclear is the way to go (or do it in places where you have a lot of hydro available, or maybe other green power).

Capture of carbon from coal is hard because it's energy-intensive, and they also want to remove particulates and other pollutants. Otherwise it's two steps forward, one step back as you have to burn more fossil fuel to capture the carbon from the fuel you just burned. Latest estimates on energy cost probably make that impractical coal.

But it's a step in the right direction to establish production-scale carbon-capture systems. That can prove the concept, and then the next obvious step if you need more capture is nuclear power. You could co-locate nuclear and carbon-capture plants, and you can probably do it in very remote areas, ie weather patterns will eventually mix and circulate the air globally.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 07:11 AM
  #5  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,406
Default

Excargodog is offline  
Old 12-12-2020, 08:41 PM
  #6  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,880
Default

So, if you have an industrial plant capturing carbon dioxide from the air, does that carbon dioxide starvation result in plants withering and starving in that local?

Of course, if it just results in buying indulgences and nothing much happens....
TransWorld is offline  
Old 12-13-2020, 09:35 AM
  #7  
Prime Minister/Moderator
Thread Starter
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,097
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
So, if you have an industrial plant capturing carbon dioxide from the air, does that carbon dioxide starvation result in plants withering and starving in that local?
Probably not. Just dump the "scrubbed" air out of tall chimneys, and it will mix nicely with the carbon-saturated ambient air. This is a slow, steady process which would have an impact over a long time frame.

Worst case the plants have to be in windy areas (for mixing) and possibly reduce output if it's dead calm. But that's probably not necessary, any more than people and animals get poisoned by the CO2 emitted from power plants or other industrial processes.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-13-2020, 09:44 AM
  #8  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

The irrational fear of nuclear power is what holds mankind back from progressing to a sustainable future.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 12-13-2020, 11:41 AM
  #9  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,406
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Probably not. Just dump the "scrubbed" air out of tall chimneys, and it will mix nicely with the carbon-saturated ambient air.

Saturated? I think you can actually mix CO2 and air in ANY concentration without saturation - at least at standard temperature and pressure.

And while CO2 separation from air is handled rather readily by any LOX plant, sequestration might be a bit more difficult. Venting the O2 wouldn’t be a problem, but storing the dry ice would be.

With cheap fusion energy, you’d probably do better just taking methane and making methane hydrates of it and pumping it down into the Marianas Trench or someplace cold and under pressure..
Excargodog is offline  
Old 12-13-2020, 12:26 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,384
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
The irrational fear of nuclear power is what holds mankind back from progressing to a sustainable future.
Totally agree. Bill Gates had plans years ago for mini nuclear plants that would have concrete walls around them and a water tower next to them. If the plant melted down, the water tower would fill the entire plant within the walls.

We need nuclear power. Would make your Tesla truly environmentally friendly
Aero1900 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JCPearce8
Flight Schools and Training
8
10-14-2019 09:13 AM
dukmoy123
Hiring News
4
10-26-2017 02:59 PM
LastXdeth
Career Questions
7
09-12-2017 06:10 PM
choppersafety
Flight Schools and Training
8
03-26-2017 09:06 AM
ufgatorpilot
Hiring News
10
08-03-2009 02:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices