Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Turbo prop PIC vs Turbo Jet PIC >

Turbo prop PIC vs Turbo Jet PIC

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Turbo prop PIC vs Turbo Jet PIC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-08-2021, 05:52 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 291
Default

I was hired about three years ago. All my pic time was multi prop. I had about a year of jets as an SIC. My interview prep said now a days jet time is better because it’s so common. So yeah, I think they look at the quality of the time. 1000 TPIC in a 135 caravan v. 121 jet - what would you do? However, if you were already there getting TPIC time, even in a single engine prop id finish out the 1000 before running off to fly a jet in the right seat, because at least you'll have the box checked. And that would be better for you overall than the jet time in the right seat. Obviously, just a slightly educated guess. Props didn’t keep me from being hired.
usernamehere is offline  
Old 07-08-2021, 05:59 AM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Just a data point…

friend was a successful entrepreneur and flew his personal sub-12.5k multi turboprop pic for 2000 hours.

sells his company, goes to fly a crj right before covid. Just got hired a spirit with about 1000 121 sic

turbine pic never hurts
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 07-08-2021, 07:15 AM
  #23  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,224
Default

Originally Posted by usernamehere View Post
I was hired about three years ago. All my pic time was multi prop. I had about a year of jets as an SIC. My interview prep said now a days jet time is better because it’s so common. So yeah, I think they look at the quality of the time. 1000 TPIC in a 135 caravan v. 121 jet - what would you do? However, if you were already there getting TPIC time, even in a single engine prop id finish out the 1000 before running off to fly a jet in the right seat, because at least you'll have the box checked. And that would be better for you overall than the jet time in the right seat. Obviously, just a slightly educated guess. Props didn’t keep me from being hired.
It seems to be a thing that you can get by with prop TPIC as long as you have glass jet SIC experience (preferably 121)... that shows you can command a complicated airplane and also that you can be trained and function at jet speeds in a crew environment.

Takeaway here is that if you're a civilian and your only experience is turbo-props you might want to consider how to get some (121) jet time... likely quicker to go do that than waiting for a call without it (which might never come).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-08-2021, 07:23 AM
  #24  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,481
Default

MULTIENGINE turboprop PIC makes you more competitive, although not as competitive as 121 jet time. 208 PIC time and multiengine piston PIC are pretty much a wash, at least in my experience.
Excargodog is online now  
Old 07-08-2021, 08:47 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 213
Default

Been flying SA227 PIC single pilot for the past year with no autopilot. ILS approach down to mins is always interesting and rewarding.
HighWingingIt is offline  
Old 07-08-2021, 10:26 AM
  #26  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Jetlikespeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Captain
Posts: 282
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
It seems to be a thing that you can get by with prop TPIC as long as you have glass jet SIC experience (preferably 121)... that shows you can command a complicated airplane and also that you can be trained and function at jet speeds in a crew environment.

Takeaway here is that if you're a civilian and your only experience is turbo-props you might want to consider how to get some (121) jet time... likely quicker to go do that than waiting for a call without it (which might never come).
In my case all my TPIC is 121 76 seater turboprop. But the consensus seems I should take the transition to the 175
Jetlikespeed is offline  
Old 07-08-2021, 10:29 AM
  #27  
Super Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,945
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed View Post
In my case all my TPIC is 121 76 seater turboprop
The “Q” stands for quiet.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 07-08-2021, 10:30 AM
  #28  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Jetlikespeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Captain
Posts: 282
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt View Post
The “Q” stands for quiet.
yeah, quite ****ing loud lol
Jetlikespeed is offline  
Old 07-08-2021, 11:50 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,665
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt View Post
The “Q” stands for quiet.
Also, stands for ANVS “Q”-uite often deferred.
John Carr is online now  
Old 07-08-2021, 12:01 PM
  #30  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,224
Default

Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed View Post
In my case all my TPIC is 121 76 seater turboprop. But the consensus seems I should take the transition to the 175
1. Jet time is good
2. Jet PIC is good
3. Type ratings are good
4. Recent training events are good

Unless you'd take an unacceptable QOL hit due to reserve/seniority, yeah transitioning is going to be a net positive on multiple accounts.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Islandhopper
Major
17
09-21-2006 07:32 AM
Islandhopper
Regional
19
09-19-2006 03:16 PM
KiloAlpha
Regional
20
07-30-2006 10:49 AM
rightseater
Major
16
05-24-2006 06:09 AM
saviboy
Regional
19
03-10-2006 02:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices