PAX Misbehavior Down 50% in 2022
 

So far anyway. Maybe they got the message...

https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-new...-far-faa-says/

Ummm, it's been two weeks...

Seriously. A report representing 11 days?

Rick, don’t take the click bait so easily.

I heard 2022 is 50% colder than 2021 was. How about that news!

NN doesn't do clickbait. Lots of travel in those two weeks and a lot of IROPs.

52 weeks in a year so how big of a sample do you need to see a possible trend? Four weeks? Forty Weeks?

Wasn’t even 2 weeks, 11 days. Might as well call it a week and a half. So how big of a sample? Maybe more than 11 days.

I really don’t care. Just find it funny that this is “news”

Plus the usual post holiday travel decline. This is a nothing burger.

It can be news. You can draw some conclusions based on trends. If passenger disruptions over the last 10 years are relatively consistent until 2021, then back to match the previous trend from the last decade in 2022, you can make a hypothesis and test it over the rest of the year. It is interesting and I will be curious to see if the trend continues as will many others. Especially considering this quote:

"According to FAA latest data released on Jan. 12, 2022’s rate of unruly incidents (so far) has dropped approximately 50% from the record highs reached around this point in 2021."

All news doesn't have to be earth shattering

“4.9 reported unruly incidents per 10,000 flights the week ending 1/2/2022” -FAA report the story cited.

Week ending 1/2/2022

Hahaha.

Your quote there is what we call a meaningless and misleading statistic. What does 50% off the previous year's high even mean? Why are they comparing the first 11 days of the year to the high point of 2021? Why not the average of the whole year of 2021? Or even better why not the first 11 days of 2021? Why do they make it ambiguous and say "around this point" lol? This is the type of data and statistic manipulation CNN/MSNBC loves to do.

As another person said this is just clickbait. A nothing burger

Correct. The article is poorly written and meant for click bait. Read the FAA linked article and it will make more sense when seeing their charts and what they are referencing.