![]() |
This is Good...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/trave...y/88971122007/
UAL can now ban pax who use audio without headphones. I like it, you have to be some kind of serious narcissist to think that's OK in any public space. And how hard is it to just use headphones of some sort :confused: |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4009093)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/trave...y/88971122007/
UAL can now ban pax who use audio without headphones. I like it, you have to be some kind of serious narcissist to think that's OK in any public space. And how hard is it to just use headphones of some sort :confused: |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 4009101)
|
This will somehow be considered "racist," and they'll roll the rule back. I think they tried something similar on Carnival cruises.
I certainly hope the rule holds firm. Nothing like having someone play on Youtube at full volume in the middle seat. F138- |
Can we add Skyhop vans and crew/employee buses to this?
|
Originally Posted by flyer138
(Post 4009119)
This will somehow be considered "racist," and they'll roll the rule back. I think they tried something similar on Carnival cruises.
I certainly hope the rule holds firm. Nothing like having someone play on Youtube at full volume in the middle seat. F138-
Originally Posted by CX500T
(Post 4009125)
Can we add Skyhop vans and crew/employee buses to this?
https://people.com/united-airlines-f...ulder-11869608 I’ve worked with this man. He is not what he is being alleged to be. That being said…I would not have said anything. |
Originally Posted by 11atsomto
(Post 4009173)
Unfortunately this could very likely be seen as that. However when we can no longer expect common courtesy, we do then have to legislate that. Remember this kind man ended up being arrested because he politely asked a fellow employee to turn it down or use headphones. She either ignored him or challenged him to make him and welll…
https://people.com/united-airlines-f...ulder-11869608 I’ve worked with this man. He is not what he is being alleged to be. That being said…I would not have said anything. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4009093)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/trave...y/88971122007/
UAL can now ban pax who use audio without headphones. I like it, you have to be some kind of serious narcissist to think that's OK in any public space. And how hard is it to just use headphones of some sort :confused: |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4009093)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/trave...y/88971122007/
UAL can now ban pax who use audio without headphones. I like it, you have to be some kind of serious narcissist to think that's OK in any public space. And how hard is it to just use headphones of some sort :confused: |
Originally Posted by 11atsomto
(Post 4009173)
Unfortunately this could very likely be seen as that. However when we can no longer expect common courtesy, we do then have to legislate that. Remember this kind man ended up being arrested because he politely asked a fellow employee to turn it down or use headphones. She either ignored him or challenged him to make him and welll…
https://people.com/united-airlines-f...ulder-11869608 I’ve worked with this man. He is not what he is being alleged to be. That being said…I would not have said anything. That being said I feel like the best play here is to turn on the most annoying song you can and stand next to the person with it on speaker. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:54 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands