Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   FAR 117 Revision (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/152641-far-117-revision.html)

rickair7777 04-01-2026 09:07 AM

FAR 117 Revision
 
FAA looking at significant changes...

https://www.altitudesmagazine.com/fa...b-flags-14-ne/

Targeted for 2028.

FutureMajor8 04-01-2026 09:22 AM

April fools? I can’t find this anywhere else?

rickair7777 04-01-2026 09:31 AM


Originally Posted by FutureMajor8 (Post 4018766)
April fools? I can’t find this anywhere else?

It came from ALPA. Unless maybe they got played? Didn't really read like April fools, seemed pragmatic, no Onion vibe. Not proposing 30 hour rest after each leg.

m3113n1a1 04-01-2026 09:54 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 4018759)
FAA looking at significant changes...

https://www.altitudesmagazine.com/fa...b-flags-14-ne/

Targeted for 2028.

Doesn't seem that significant. FAR 117 already limits you to 3 consecutive WOCL intrusions unless given a 2 hour rest break in a suitable accommodation. This just mandates a 30 hour reset.

FutureMajor8 04-01-2026 10:02 AM


Originally Posted by m3113n1a1 (Post 4018773)
Doesn't seem that significant. FAR 117 already limits you to 3 consecutive WOCL intrusions unless given a 2 hour rest break in a suitable accommodation. This just mandates a 30 hour reset.

The 220 hour duty in 168 is pretty significant. That actually seems ludicrous.

WXS15 04-01-2026 10:19 AM


Originally Posted by FutureMajor8 (Post 4018776)
The 220 hour duty in 168 is pretty significant. That actually seems ludicrous.

It's not 220 in 168, but rather 220 flight duty period hours within a rolling 672-hour (28-day) window.

You would have to work twenty out of twenty-eight days while averaging 11hrs/day to hit that limit. Restricting pilots to less than one third of their life in an airplane doesn't seem too unreasonable.

DeltaboundRedux 04-01-2026 10:20 AM

"Airlines for America estimated the proposed 30-hour reset requirement could require 4,800 to 8,000 additional pilot hires. The Regional Airline Association said the duty-hour cap would disproportionately impact short-haul regional operators."

FutureMajor8 04-01-2026 10:28 AM


Originally Posted by WXS15 (Post 4018783)
It's not 220 in 168, but rather 220 flight duty period hours within a rolling 672-hour (28-day) window.

You would have to work twenty out of twenty-eight days while averaging 11hrs/day to hit that limit. Restricting pilots to less than one third of their life in an airplane doesn't seem too unreasonable.

I misread it. Thanks

tnkrdrvr 04-01-2026 11:04 AM


Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux (Post 4018785)
"Airlines for America estimated the proposed 30-hour reset requirement could require 4,800 to 8,000 additional pilot hires. The Regional Airline Association said the duty-hour cap would disproportionately impact short-haul regional operators."

Regional air carriers are against their pilots not living in the cockpit!!! I’m shocked, shocked I say.

BoilerUP 04-01-2026 11:15 AM

Meanwhile, cargo pilots be like

https://i.imgflip.com/ao6av2.jpg

rickair7777 04-01-2026 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by BoilerUP (Post 4018805)
Meanwhile, cargo pilots be like

No!

Any other other questions?

NuGuy 04-01-2026 12:12 PM

It's not on FAA.GOV nor the Federal Register. I haven't seen any ALPA email that contains this.

4/1/26

Jetlikespeed 04-01-2026 12:17 PM

Who ASAPs a 8 second snoozer in cruise
same gal who wrote up the Southwest crew?

LinaPeru 04-01-2026 01:35 PM

Everyone just relax. They’re still not touching the elephant in the room: Commuting Fatigue.

Ozone Scrubber 04-01-2026 04:02 PM

I am a “don’t fix what isn’t broken” kind of guy.
So … what exactly is broken?

(or am I an April fool)

highfarfast 04-01-2026 05:28 PM

I saw this before I came here. I see I am not the only one to glance at the date and raise an eyebrow. I have no idea of it's a joke or not. But it's annoying that people think it's fun to make stuff up in vain of news on this day to the point I have to quadruple the sensitivity of my bull**** sensor.

jetlaggy 04-01-2026 06:31 PM

Mid-to-Late 2028 (est.) — Full compliance required for Part 121 carriers; regional operators have until early 2029



hmmm

tallpilot 04-01-2026 08:06 PM


Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux (Post 4018785)
"Airlines for America estimated the proposed 30-hour reset requirement could require 4,800 to 8,000 additional pilot hires. The Regional Airline Association said the duty-hour cap would disproportionately impact short-haul regional operators."

It isn't short segments that cause long duty days; it's the ridiculous sits between them. Time to get back to efficiency.

Valar Morghulis 04-02-2026 04:27 AM


Originally Posted by tallpilot (Post 4018928)
It isn't short segments that cause long duty days; it's the ridiculous sits between them. Time to get back to efficiency.

You guys know this was an April fools joke, right?

Smooth at FL450 04-02-2026 06:28 AM


Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed (Post 4018820)
Who ASAPs a 8 second snoozer in cruise
same gal who wrote up the Southwest crew?

seriously. How does she know it was 8 seconds? Shoulda coordinated the nap and gone for 8 minutes…

JulesWinfield 04-02-2026 08:08 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 4018759)
FAA looking at significant changes...

https://www.altitudesmagazine.com/fa...b-flags-14-ne/

Targeted for 2028.

AI slop my boy

GutterGuard 04-03-2026 05:13 AM


Originally Posted by JulesWinfield (Post 4019022)
AI slop my boy

Who falls for this crap?

rickair7777 04-03-2026 07:53 AM


Originally Posted by GutterGuard (Post 4019217)
Who falls for this crap?

Well ALPA did. Since that's where the email came from.

GutterGuard 04-03-2026 10:06 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 4019287)
Well ALPA did. Since that's where the email came from.

I have seen zero formal comms from ALPA regarding this fake NPRM.

ThumbsUp 04-03-2026 10:10 AM


Originally Posted by GutterGuard (Post 4019329)
I have seen zero formal comms from ALPA regarding this fake NPRM.

Probably one council or individual MEC. We didn’t see it at UAL, either.

GutterGuard 04-03-2026 10:22 AM


Originally Posted by ThumbsUp (Post 4019330)
Probably one council or individual MEC. We didn’t see it at UAL, either.

I looked at each individual LEC's recent communications, as well as the MEC. Zero mention of an FAA NPRM. No NPRM on the FAA RGL. It's fake news.

rickair7777 04-03-2026 12:24 PM


Originally Posted by GutterGuard (Post 4019329)
I have seen zero formal comms from ALPA regarding this fake NPRM.



It was in the daily newsblast email from National, on Apr 1.

I don't think they intended it as a prank, those are usually over the top outrageous. It's possible ALPA staff got played?

PineappleXpres 04-03-2026 10:50 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 4019362)
It was in the daily newsblast email from National, on Apr 1.

I don't think they intended it as a prank, those are usually over the top outrageous. It's possible ALPA staff got played?

Aren’t those AI compilations? Could be, but hopefully there’s a human filter.

GutterGuard 04-04-2026 04:33 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 4019362)
It was in the daily newsblast email from National, on Apr 1.

I don't think they intended it as a prank, those are usually over the top outrageous. It's possible ALPA staff got played?

The article says they're instituting an FFP limit of 220 hours in 28 days.

117 already has a 190 hour FDP limit in the same period.

I asked my reps about it, they're aware of the article and there is no formal endorsement from ALPA. They say it's a bad April fool's article, or AI slop.

rickair7777 04-04-2026 06:08 AM


Originally Posted by PineappleXpres (Post 4019523)
Aren’t those AI compilations? Could be, but hopefully there’s a human filter.

I've been getting those emails for many years, never seemed like AI. Especially since AI didn't exist years ago.

I noticed the article itself wasn't great journalism, but I had assumed that since it came from ALPA that it was at least factual if not well written.

Maybe the staffer relied on AI to do their job. Hopefully they supervise better in the future.

ThumbsUp 04-04-2026 06:37 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 4019570)
I've been getting those emails for many years, never seemed like AI. Especially since AI didn't exist years ago.

I noticed the article itself wasn't great journalism, but I had assumed that since it came from ALPA that it was at least factual if not well written.

Maybe the staffer relied on AI to do their job. Hopefully they supervise better in the future.

ALPA doesn’t make those e-mails. It’s a company called bulletin intelligence.

PineappleXpres 04-04-2026 07:20 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 4019570)
I've been getting those emails for many years, never seemed like AI. Especially since AI didn't exist years ago.

I noticed the article itself wasn't great journalism, but I had assumed that since it came from ALPA that it was at least factual if not well written.

Maybe the staffer relied on AI to do their job. Hopefully they supervise better in the future.


Originally Posted by ThumbsUp (Post 4019579)
ALPA doesn’t make those e-mails. It’s a company called bulletin intelligence.

At the end of the day, all remote work is at risk of AI.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands