![]() |
FAR 117 Revision
FAA looking at significant changes...
https://www.altitudesmagazine.com/fa...b-flags-14-ne/ Targeted for 2028. |
April fools? I can’t find this anywhere else?
|
Originally Posted by FutureMajor8
(Post 4018766)
April fools? I can’t find this anywhere else?
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4018759)
FAA looking at significant changes...
https://www.altitudesmagazine.com/fa...b-flags-14-ne/ Targeted for 2028. |
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 4018773)
Doesn't seem that significant. FAR 117 already limits you to 3 consecutive WOCL intrusions unless given a 2 hour rest break in a suitable accommodation. This just mandates a 30 hour reset.
|
Originally Posted by FutureMajor8
(Post 4018776)
The 220 hour duty in 168 is pretty significant. That actually seems ludicrous.
You would have to work twenty out of twenty-eight days while averaging 11hrs/day to hit that limit. Restricting pilots to less than one third of their life in an airplane doesn't seem too unreasonable. |
"Airlines for America estimated the proposed 30-hour reset requirement could require 4,800 to 8,000 additional pilot hires. The Regional Airline Association said the duty-hour cap would disproportionately impact short-haul regional operators."
|
Originally Posted by WXS15
(Post 4018783)
It's not 220 in 168, but rather 220 flight duty period hours within a rolling 672-hour (28-day) window.
You would have to work twenty out of twenty-eight days while averaging 11hrs/day to hit that limit. Restricting pilots to less than one third of their life in an airplane doesn't seem too unreasonable. |
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 4018785)
"Airlines for America estimated the proposed 30-hour reset requirement could require 4,800 to 8,000 additional pilot hires. The Regional Airline Association said the duty-hour cap would disproportionately impact short-haul regional operators."
|
|
Originally Posted by BoilerUP
(Post 4018805)
Meanwhile, cargo pilots be like
Any other other questions? |
It's not on FAA.GOV nor the Federal Register. I haven't seen any ALPA email that contains this.
4/1/26 |
Who ASAPs a 8 second snoozer in cruise
same gal who wrote up the Southwest crew? |
Everyone just relax. They’re still not touching the elephant in the room: Commuting Fatigue.
|
I am a “don’t fix what isn’t broken” kind of guy.
So … what exactly is broken? (or am I an April fool) |
I saw this before I came here. I see I am not the only one to glance at the date and raise an eyebrow. I have no idea of it's a joke or not. But it's annoying that people think it's fun to make stuff up in vain of news on this day to the point I have to quadruple the sensitivity of my bull**** sensor.
|
Mid-to-Late 2028 (est.) — Full compliance required for Part 121 carriers; regional operators have until early 2029
hmmm |
Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux
(Post 4018785)
"Airlines for America estimated the proposed 30-hour reset requirement could require 4,800 to 8,000 additional pilot hires. The Regional Airline Association said the duty-hour cap would disproportionately impact short-haul regional operators."
|
Originally Posted by tallpilot
(Post 4018928)
It isn't short segments that cause long duty days; it's the ridiculous sits between them. Time to get back to efficiency.
|
Originally Posted by Jetlikespeed
(Post 4018820)
Who ASAPs a 8 second snoozer in cruise
same gal who wrote up the Southwest crew? |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4018759)
FAA looking at significant changes...
https://www.altitudesmagazine.com/fa...b-flags-14-ne/ Targeted for 2028. |
Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
(Post 4019022)
AI slop my boy
|
Originally Posted by GutterGuard
(Post 4019217)
Who falls for this crap?
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4019287)
Well ALPA did. Since that's where the email came from.
|
Originally Posted by GutterGuard
(Post 4019329)
I have seen zero formal comms from ALPA regarding this fake NPRM.
|
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 4019330)
Probably one council or individual MEC. We didn’t see it at UAL, either.
|
Originally Posted by GutterGuard
(Post 4019329)
I have seen zero formal comms from ALPA regarding this fake NPRM.
It was in the daily newsblast email from National, on Apr 1. I don't think they intended it as a prank, those are usually over the top outrageous. It's possible ALPA staff got played? |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4019362)
It was in the daily newsblast email from National, on Apr 1.
I don't think they intended it as a prank, those are usually over the top outrageous. It's possible ALPA staff got played? |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4019362)
It was in the daily newsblast email from National, on Apr 1.
I don't think they intended it as a prank, those are usually over the top outrageous. It's possible ALPA staff got played? 117 already has a 190 hour FDP limit in the same period. I asked my reps about it, they're aware of the article and there is no formal endorsement from ALPA. They say it's a bad April fool's article, or AI slop. |
Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
(Post 4019523)
Aren’t those AI compilations? Could be, but hopefully there’s a human filter.
I noticed the article itself wasn't great journalism, but I had assumed that since it came from ALPA that it was at least factual if not well written. Maybe the staffer relied on AI to do their job. Hopefully they supervise better in the future. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4019570)
I've been getting those emails for many years, never seemed like AI. Especially since AI didn't exist years ago.
I noticed the article itself wasn't great journalism, but I had assumed that since it came from ALPA that it was at least factual if not well written. Maybe the staffer relied on AI to do their job. Hopefully they supervise better in the future. |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 4019570)
I've been getting those emails for many years, never seemed like AI. Especially since AI didn't exist years ago.
I noticed the article itself wasn't great journalism, but I had assumed that since it came from ALPA that it was at least factual if not well written. Maybe the staffer relied on AI to do their job. Hopefully they supervise better in the future.
Originally Posted by ThumbsUp
(Post 4019579)
ALPA doesn’t make those e-mails. It’s a company called bulletin intelligence.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands