Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Independence Furloughs Flight Crews in Preparation for Possible Closure >

Independence Furloughs Flight Crews in Preparation for Possible Closure

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Independence Furloughs Flight Crews in Preparation for Possible Closure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-03-2006, 02:08 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by B757200ER
Appears that it's officially over January 5th. What a shame. And a waste.
Sad, but their business plan was flawed from day #1.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 05:42 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 758
Default

Originally Posted by fireman0174
Sad, but their business plan was flawed from day #1.
I don't have an opinion about there business plan, but I do have a question.
Could they have made it had fuel prices stayed low?

Good Luck to you Independence peeps.
skybolt is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 06:08 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt
I don't have an opinion about there business plan, but I do have a question. Could they have made it had fuel prices stayed low?
It's just my opinion, but I don't think so. They needed to either return to their "feeder" system or replace those RJs. The economics of trying to fly a 50 seat RJ against mainline airlines was a death spiral.

JMHO.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 06:45 AM
  #14  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
Thread Starter
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by skybolt
I don't have an opinion about there business plan, but I do have a question.
Could they have made it had fuel prices stayed low?

Good Luck to you Independence peeps.
I think the plan had merit personally. However the implementation was very poor and fuel prices didn't help one bit. The way the company launched with 600 flights a day (all empty) and over frequency to many small cities burned through too much cash too quickly.

The company also lost all of their pricing power when they undercut the competition so much that they couldn't make money even with 100% loads.
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 08:13 AM
  #15  
Need More Callouts
 
757Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Unbridled Enthusiasm
Posts: 2,143
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
I think the plan had merit personally. However the implementation was very poor and fuel prices didn't help one bit. The way the company launched with 600 flights a day (all empty) and over frequency to many small cities burned through too much cash too quickly.

The company also lost all of their pricing power when they undercut the competition so much that they couldn't make money even with 100% loads.
Your statement makes no sense whatsoever. The "Plan" they had didn't and couldn't work. Flying around passengers for less than your costs won't work and unfortunately their actions spurred other carriers to follow suit.

Poorly run company that once again screws its dedicated employees. I'll bet the management team is leaving with a bundle.
757Driver is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 08:28 PM
  #16  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
Thread Starter
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by 757Driver
Your statement makes no sense whatsoever. The "Plan" they had didn't and couldn't work. Flying around passengers for less than your costs won't work and unfortunately their actions spurred other carriers to follow suit.

Poorly run company that once again screws its dedicated employees. I'll bet the management team is leaving with a bundle.
Actually the concept of a low cost airline out of IAD could have worked if managment hadn't screwed up the marketing and pricing of the tickets.

IDE as a whole was reactive rather than being proactive. They failed to set proper ticket prices. They failed to gain the initiative. They failed to market the airline effectively.

Hindsight is 20/20, but if the company had set realistic pricing (higher than it was, but lower than the majors), and effectively spent the money, I do think that the plan had merit and could have succeeded.

The business plan wasn't failed. The implementation and management was.
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 01-04-2006, 05:52 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by FlyerJosh
The business plan wasn't failed. The implementation and management was.
IMHO, the business plan was as flawed as their management. After all, the business plan was designed by management.

They attempted to take an airplane, an RJ 50-seater, and use it in a market it was never designed for.

Unfortunetly, ACA was put in a very bad position because of UAL's chapter 11 filing.
fireman0174 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freight Dog
Hiring News
13
09-21-2006 09:50 PM
LAfrequentflyer
Hangar Talk
6
11-16-2005 06:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices