Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Southwest Airlines Article from CNN >

Southwest Airlines Article from CNN

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Southwest Airlines Article from CNN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2008, 06:41 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SmoothOnTop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 645
Default hold on there tex!

NEIY -Not Enough Information, Yet
SmoothOnTop is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 06:42 PM
  #22  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 12
Default

I think Herb is sitting back having a few wild turkey's pondering this one. In reality I don't think this is going to hurt SWA they will somehow take a twist with this one and probably find some marketing genius side to it...stranger things have happened.
license2fly is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 06:50 PM
  #23  
seeing the large hubs...
 
iaflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 73N A
Posts: 3,705
Default

Originally Posted by LuvJockey View Post
The saga continues...

Boeing press release:

Southwest Airlines contacted Boeing for verification of their technical opinion that the continued operation of their Classic 737s, for up to ten days until the airplanes could be reinspected, did not pose a safety of flight issue. Based on a thorough review of many factors, including fleet history and test data, as well as other inspections and maintenance previously incorporated, Boeing concluded the 10-day compliance plan was technically valid. In Boeing's opinion, the safety of the Southwest fleet was not compromised.
Doesn't matter - the FAA still has to approve the extension. If my airline wants to extend something as simple as a DMI (deferred mx item) they need approval from their FAA Prinicpal Mx Inspector, even if Boeing says it's fine.
iaflyer is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 07:05 PM
  #24  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Default Info From SWA

Hi everyone,
You may want to check out Southwest's blog for more information on this.
Brian
SWABrian is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:00 PM
  #25  
*********
 
paxhauler85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25 View Post
Dude, you need to change your sign on...it says CRJ-200 CA (Soon). If that's correct you're not the one requesting the furthest runway........
Just making a point that those who don't know their butt from third base shouldn't post on any airline thread.

Every CA I fly with leaves the choice up to me, when there is a choice involved.

The "soon" thing will not be applicable here in another month.
paxhauler85 is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:09 PM
  #26  
pants on the ground
 
mmaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: back seat
Posts: 1,358
Default

have never flown southwest and never will, unless........?
Tune in tomorrow — same unairworthy time, same unairworthy channel
mmaviator is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:36 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,802
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25 View Post
Besides, I never thought it was unsafe to fly SWA, just land and taxi
LoL you know it
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:40 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,802
Default

...::deleted::...
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 03-06-2008, 09:42 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,802
Default

Originally Posted by LuvJockey View Post
I'm sure some are happy to see a negative article on SWA, because most probably believe that a black eye for SWA will help their own company...
Can anybody actually, seriously wish ill-will on WN?? I know that happens in the Regionals all the time, but ya'll grow up when you move on, right??
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 03-07-2008, 03:25 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SmoothOnTop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 645
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB View Post
Can anybody actually, seriously wish ill-will on WN?? I know that happens in the Regionals all the time, but ya'll grow up when you move on, right??
Count I: At the Regionals, the 59,791 cycles (even self-disclosed) may have resulted in $10K per.

Count II: The 1451 additional cycles would probably have been levied at the maximum $25K per (willful intent).

$ 626 million ($ 590M + $36M) makes jo's Hawaiian headache look like chump change.

This makes the WN CFO's decision very easy to write the 10M check.

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...westletter.pdf

Last edited by SmoothOnTop; 03-07-2008 at 04:15 AM.
SmoothOnTop is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RockBottom
Major
1
12-08-2005 06:50 AM
Baba Bluey
Major
7
11-14-2005 09:45 AM
SWAcapt
Major
2
10-20-2005 10:07 AM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
04-14-2005 02:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices