Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
UAL 747 clips Qantas 767 at MEL >

UAL 747 clips Qantas 767 at MEL

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

UAL 747 clips Qantas 767 at MEL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2006, 09:26 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: tri current
Posts: 1,485
Default UAL 747 clips Qantas 767 at MEL

Quote:
Jumbo clips taxiing Qantas jet
Carmel Egan and Jenny McAsey
February 03, 2006

A SHUDDERING jolt ran through a Qantas jet as it was hit from behind by a United Airlines 747-400 on the tarmac at Melbourne airport yesterday.

The left wing of the Los Angeles-bound jumbo sheered off the tip of the right tail winglet on the Qantas Boeing 767.

The accident occurred as both planes taxied towards the runway in preparation for take-off just after 1pm. None of the 155 passengers and 11 crew on the Qantas jet and 99 passengers and 14 crew on the United Airlines flight was injured.

But for athlete Anna Worland, the accident almost resulted in her missing the Commonwealth Games selection trials in Sydney.

When Worland eventually made it to Sydney for her 1500m heat, after being delayed several hours, losing her luggage containing running gear and being stuck in Sydney traffic, she was relieved to hear the heats had been cancelled and that she would go straight into tonight's semi-finals.

The captain of QF434 described the incident as a clip from behind by another aircraft.

"We were going out as normal and all of a sudden there was this giant shudder through the whole plane," said Peter Kirk, who was on the domestic flight. "You can see a little damage on the leading edge of the United plane's wing."

Rowan Frew, who was going to Sydney for a holiday, was sitting in the middle of the Qantas jet.

"There was a loud shuddering noise and a united gasp from the passengers," she said. "Nobody was terribly alarmed."

United said in a statement that its flight 840 from Melbourne to Los Angeles via Sydney "reported a wingtip touch with a Qantas aircraft as it taxied".

According to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority, responsibility for aircraft movements on the ground is shared by airline pilots and air traffic control.

The CASA manual for air traffic standards says: "The pilot in command is primarily responsible for ensuring separation from another aircraft."

However, Air Traffic Control "must control runway operations with landing and take-off clearances and facilitate a high movement rate by providing traffic information and/or sequencing instructions."

Australian Transport Safety Bureau investigators flew from Canberra yesterday afternoon to begin a report into the incident

Right tail winglet = Horizontal stabilizer


Typhoonpilot
Typhoonpilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2006, 09:29 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: tri current
Posts: 1,485
Default

Some pics off Pprune:

http://mozza.rwy34.com/albums/misc/DSCF0963.jpg

http://mozza.rwy34.com/albums/misc/DSCF0964.jpg

http://mozza.rwy34.com/albums/misc/DSCF0965.jpg

http://mozza.rwy34.com/albums/misc/DSCF0966.jpg

http://mozza.rwy34.com/albums/misc/DSCF0967.jpg

http://mozza.rwy34.com/albums/misc/DSCF0968.jpg

http://mozza.rwy34.com/albums/misc/DSCF0969.jpg

http://mozza.rwy34.com/albums/misc/DSCF0970.jpg
Typhoonpilot is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 01:00 AM
  #3  
Da Man
 
WatchThis!'s Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: DC-10 F/O
Posts: 436
Default


WatchThis! is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 07:42 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Geronimo4497's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Formerly Avantair
Posts: 197
Default

Oops!

99 pax on a US bound flight? Hmmmm, that cannot be a good sign. Can United even make money on a flight that is only a quarter full?
Geronimo4497 is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 08:38 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,943
Default

Originally Posted by Geronimo4497
99 pax on a US bound flight? Hmmmm, that cannot be a good sign. Can United even make money on a flight that is only a quarter full?
The event occurred in Melbourne and it said the flight was to LAX via Sydney. There were most likely a large number of pax to be boarded at Sydney before going back to LAX.
contrails is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 08:47 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by Geronimo4497
Oops!

99 pax on a US bound flight? Hmmmm, that cannot be a good sign. Can United even make money on a flight that is only a quarter full?
The flight goes from MEL to SYD to LAX. Very heavy out of SYD.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 09:04 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Geronimo4497's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Formerly Avantair
Posts: 197
Default

Thanks, I'm a turboprop pilot, and therefore, not very smart.
Geronimo4497 is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 10:05 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CVG767A's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 767ER capt
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally Posted by Geronimo4497
Thanks, I'm a turboprop pilot, and therefore, not very smart.
And I'm an airline pilot, and therefore, not very smart!
CVG767A is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 11:03 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ERJ135's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: CR7 Capt
Posts: 1,621
Default

[QUOTE=Typhoonpilot]Quote:
Jumbo clips taxiing Qantas jet
Carmel Egan and Jenny McAsey
February 03, 2006

United said in a statement that its flight 840 from Melbourne to Los Angeles via Sydney "reported a wingtip touch with a Qantas aircraft as it taxied".

That looks like a little more than a wingtip touch. I love wording they use.
ERJ135 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices