Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Scam: High Fuel Prices >

Scam: High Fuel Prices

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Scam: High Fuel Prices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-03-2008, 01:48 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

yea like bush controls the commodity markets.... geez.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 05:05 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Coach
Posts: 117
Default

Originally Posted by carl p View Post
Are you serious with that statement? Sit down and think how much the price of everything around you has gone up over the last 12-18 months. I did not say you could not loan someone money to invest in oil. I simply said that the investor should be required to have more "skin in the game" than a lousy 10%. People act far more rationally when their own money is involved. We have seen the same mentality at work with the dot com crash, and the housing bubble. People will get in over their heads with the hopes of striking it rich. I can't stand big government, but every law governing markets was put in place after somebody got screwed. Oil is a national security concern, nothing else has such a wide ranging effect on our economy and daily lives.

When you say they'll get what's coming to them if they're wrong, who do you think ultimately foots the bill every time markets loose touch with fundamentals?
ok... to the "taxpayers end up footing the bill argument." true - occassionally, the taxpayers get saddled with the bill (this rarely happens - with bear stearns, we don't know if the taxpayers will bear a burden - the answer is that they most likely won't). i'll be the first to say that while we shouldn't interfere with voluntary financial transactions, we shouldn't "bail out" those who lose their pants in those same transactions. when we do, we create a "moral hazard," which only encourages more speculation in the long run (which can be painful during short run spurts as would be the case w/ oil now, if it is indeed in a "bubble").

whether it's 10% or 100%, SOMEONE (other than the taxpayers) has their skin in the game. if a speculator is borrowing 100% and defaults, he'll pay a price regardless (he'll probably have a tough time borrowing next time around). more importantly, the lender will lose a LOT of skin. in the short term, non-participants in the transaction may pay a price in the form of market volatility - but as long as we maintain unfettered markets, the speculators themselves will beat out the volatility in the long run.

freedom will be much less painful in the long run than intervention. intervention is always fraught with unintended consequences. in the case of a bailout, that unintended consequence is "moral hazard," which is every bit as bad as interfering with free financial transactions in the first place.

by the way, fuel hedging is every bit a form of speculation as what you describe. the act of fuel hedging pushes prices up in the same way as speculation. in fact, if you look at how leveraged the airlines are, they probably have a lot less equity behind the transaction than you would require!
bbtp is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 06:04 AM
  #23  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by papacharlie View Post
please leave bush ....please....you're killing us
Funny thing is the Democrats took control of the House and the Senate two years ago promising to change everything and they did. Consumer confidence has fallen, the price of gas has gone up about $75/barrel in 2006 to over $110, food prices have climbed, Congress is still trying to peddle ethanol as an wrong answer to the wrong question...

Name one major piece of legislation the Ds have passed, especially on energy. Can't drill, can't explore, can't build wind farms because they are ugly, can't do nuclear because it is unsafe... and on and on and on. BUT Hillary wants to tack on a 'windfall profits' tax. How does that help the man on the street? It doesn't but it does whack those mean old 'BIG OIL" guys. Right.. simple solutions for simple minds.

(note: two things to watch for.. the use of the word big and someone touting a fee, tax, revenue enhancement and noting that for the average taxpayer it will only be x%. First big equals nefarious, greedy in the language of politics unless it is spending your money and second, most of the country does not pay diddly in taxes so that means anyone who is making a few dollars is going to get cleaned. )
III Corps is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 06:05 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Coach
Posts: 117
Default

Originally Posted by carl p View Post
Oil is a national security concern, nothing else has such a wide ranging effect on our economy and daily lives.
oil has the widest-ranging effect on our daily lives???

ok, tell that to venezuelans, who continue to live in poverty despite the fact that the value of their greatest national resource has soared. clearly, FREEDOM has a greater effect than the price of oil.

tell that to the cubans, who have, on a regular basis, risked their lives to cross the straits of florida in shoddy dinghies to escape the castro repression. they did this when oil was below $20 per barrel, and they continued to do it as the price of oil soared. FREEDOM clearly had a greater effect than the price of oil.

tell that to the mexicans, who despite the economic slowdown here, continue to risk their lives to cross the arizona desert in hopes of finding a better livelihood here. again, they continue to do this despite a soaring value in their own natural resources - unfortuntely, their natural resources are controlled by the state while the free market invests in ours. again, clearly FREEDOM has a greater effect than the price of oil.

tell that to the north koreans. they have no oil as a natural resource. but, regardless of oil's price, they have been suffering repression and famines for years. i doubt that they find oil having much impact on their lives.

in my personal life here, i find MANY things that are more important to my DAILY life and will continue to be more important in the long run. oil is only peripherally a national security concern - and it certainly doesn't have nearly the most wide-ranging effect on my life or that of most human beings.

be careful what you wish for. if you think the price of oil is a "scam" and is a bubble, there are plenty of easy ways to profit from that hunch. go for it - i won't loan you the dough, but you probably will find someone that will (or risk your own capital if you wish). i don't know what it's going to do, so you won't find me putting $$ where my keyboard is - i'll just stump for freedom instead.
bbtp is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 08:54 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 727 VIP Left
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by bbtp View Post
ok... to the "taxpayers end up footing the bill argument." true - occassionally, the taxpayers get saddled with the bill (this rarely happens - with bear stearns, we don't know if the taxpayers will bear a burden - the answer is that they most likely won't). i'll be the first to say that while we shouldn't interfere with voluntary financial transactions, we shouldn't "bail out" those who lose their pants in those same transactions. when we do, we create a "moral hazard," which only encourages more speculation in the long run (which can be painful during short run spurts as would be the case w/ oil now, if it is indeed in a "bubble").

whether it's 10% or 100%, SOMEONE (other than the taxpayers) has their skin in the game. if a speculator is borrowing 100% and defaults, he'll pay a price regardless (he'll probably have a tough time borrowing next time around). more importantly, the lender will lose a LOT of skin. in the short term, non-participants in the transaction may pay a price in the form of market volatility - but as long as we maintain unfettered markets, the speculators themselves will beat out the volatility in the long run.

freedom will be much less painful in the long run than intervention. intervention is always fraught with unintended consequences. in the case of a bailout, that unintended consequence is "moral hazard," which is every bit as bad as interfering with free financial transactions in the first place.

by the way, fuel hedging is every bit a form of speculation as what you describe. the act of fuel hedging pushes prices up in the same way as speculation. in fact, if you look at how leveraged the airlines are, they probably have a lot less equity behind the transaction than you would require!
The taxpayers almost always foot the bill. Remember the savings and loan bailout 20 years ago? What about Enron & Worlcom, how many people were affected by that? First, consider how many workers and investors lost everything they had in addition to the people that were screwed while Enron was manipulating energy supplies out west to drive up prices. Finally, when the utilities in Ca. went broke who eventually bailed them out paying much higher rates for energy? The Ca. taxpayer. As for Bear, how bout the 14,000 workers or the shareholders? I bet they consider themselves "injured" even though you stated earlier "they don't injure anyone else" with speculation. Don't think it's a bailout? The Fed backed the riskiest part of Bear's portfolio with $30 billion of our money. Even if that money isn't lost, we still pay the price with a further de-valued dollar. Printing money to bailout Bear certainly costs the taxpayer in the long run. While letting Bear fail might have been a cure worse than the disease, the issue is unchecked speculation. Democracy and Capitalism are the best we have to offer, but they both require checks and balances. Ethics aren't something we're all born with, especially when massive sums of money are involved. The result when speculation creates bubbles and collapses is always increased regulation, something your against. Regulation is almost always reactionary, after free markets have been abused. I believe in strongly Capitalism and Democracy, but even our founding fathers new checks and balances are the key. History has taught us that some people will cross the line to make a buck.

Last edited by carl p; 05-03-2008 at 09:08 AM.
carl p is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 09:06 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 727 VIP Left
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by bbtp View Post
oil has the widest-ranging effect on our daily lives???

ok, tell that to venezuelans, who continue to live in poverty despite the fact that the value of their greatest national resource has soared. clearly, FREEDOM has a greater effect than the price of oil.

tell that to the cubans, who have, on a regular basis, risked their lives to cross the straits of florida in shoddy dinghies to escape the castro repression. they did this when oil was below $20 per barrel, and they continued to do it as the price of oil soared. FREEDOM clearly had a greater effect than the price of oil.

tell that to the mexicans, who despite the economic slowdown here, continue to risk their lives to cross the arizona desert in hopes of finding a better livelihood here. again, they continue to do this despite a soaring value in their own natural resources - unfortuntely, their natural resources are controlled by the state while the free market invests in ours. again, clearly FREEDOM has a greater effect than the price of oil.

tell that to the north koreans. they have no oil as a natural resource. but, regardless of oil's price, they have been suffering repression and famines for years. i doubt that they find oil having much impact on their lives.

in my personal life here, i find MANY things that are more important to my DAILY life and will continue to be more important in the long run. oil is only peripherally a national security concern - and it certainly doesn't have nearly the most wide-ranging effect on my life or that of most human beings.

be careful what you wish for. if you think the price of oil is a "scam" and is a bubble, there are plenty of easy ways to profit from that hunch. go for it - i won't loan you the dough, but you probably will find someone that will (or risk your own capital if you wish). i don't know what it's going to do, so you won't find me putting $$ where my keyboard is - i'll just stump for freedom instead.
The discussion is about oil and speculation, of course nothing is more important than our freedom.

Oil is the single most important commodity to this country. It is clearly a matter of national security. The government creating the SPR illustrates how vital it is to our survival in the near future. The fact that we fought to protect Saudi Arabia's oil from Saddam in Desert Storm shows how important our gov feels it is to national security.

No more long posts please, I'm a terrible typist!
carl p is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 11:30 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Coach
Posts: 117
Default

Originally Posted by carl p View Post
but even our founding fathers new checks and balances are the key.
we're not going to agree - which is fine, because reasonable people can disagree. however, in defense of our founding fathers, their checks and balances were on branches of government, not markets .
bbtp is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 11:35 AM
  #28  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Default

Check this out. Takes about an hour for all eight videos.

Interesting story about oil pricing.


1.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbakN7SLdbk
2.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGGjbDjnNzw
3.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q39ic04vhNo
4.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKCyCYz_aHY
5.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TYmSGwAumk
6.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbwMOvV6ctg
7.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5HGHsy3H_0
8.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC61X78-OI0


.

Last edited by GearDown; 05-03-2008 at 11:37 AM. Reason: added 1 - 8
GearDown is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 11:57 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 727 VIP Left
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by bbtp View Post
we're not going to agree - which is fine, because reasonable people can disagree. however, in defense of our founding fathers, their checks and balances were on branches of government, not markets .
Sure they are for the branches of government, which is how important the founding fathers felt it was to have oversight and accountability. We'll agree to disagree, good day.
carl p is offline  
Old 05-03-2008, 12:08 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Coach
Posts: 117
Default

Originally Posted by GearDown View Post
Check this out. Takes about an hour for all eight videos.

Interesting story about oil pricing.
geardown - thanks. i checked out a bit of it. one thing is indisputable - there is a significant amount of energy that we currently are unable to tap due to government intervention. this includes prudhoe bay, anwr, offshore oil, nuclear power, venezuelan/mexican/etc oil (not due to our gov't's intervention, but theirs) among others. at $110+ per barrel, a lot of formerly unattractive reserves become very attractive. however, threats by politician to expropriate the profits of "big oil" decreases the incentives to invest in and tap these reserves, doing little to stabilize (or reduce for that matter) the price of oil.

there is little direct action the government can/should take to bring down the price of oil other than to let the markets do their job while the government maintains sound and non-inflationary monetary policy. as for the latter, it's certainly debatable whether or not our government has done its job in that respect (as carl pointed out!).
bbtp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Major
20
05-03-2008 12:03 PM
Lbell911
Major
14
04-13-2008 07:00 AM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
8
04-10-2008 11:31 AM
joel payne
Foreign
6
02-19-2008 11:17 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-26-2005 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices