Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Business Travelers Flee Airlines >

Business Travelers Flee Airlines

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Business Travelers Flee Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2008, 01:15 PM
  #1  
A moment please...
Thread Starter
 
JetPiedmont's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Just passin' thru
Posts: 769
Default Business Travelers Flee Airlines

It's no wonder our industry and careers are suffering from the lack of high yield travelers. I don't think airline management could have done more to alienate what was once the bread and butter of our industry if they had tried:


The Waning Days of the Road Warrior
Andy Martin

For years, Irv Rothman, CEO of Hewlett-Packard's Financial Services division, traveled at least once a quarter—top three lieutenants in tow—from his New Jersey base to HP's Silicon Valley headquarters. After enduring Newark airport hell and six-and-a-half hours of stale, germy air, the team would arrive, strung out, to meet with their boss. For one hour. Then they would turn around and do the whole thing all over again.

So far this year, the quartet has made not one pilgrimage to Northern California. They meet Jon Flaxman, HP's chief administrative officer, over Halo, HP's hyper-realistic videoconferencing system. They are home in time for dinner. And they don't care if they ever see Silicon Valley again.

Whenever there's an economic downturn, corporations slash their travel budgets. The International Air Transport Assn. is already reporting that business and first-class travel have experienced the biggest plunge in five years. Typically, when the economy snaps back, so do the business trips.

This time, though, certain types of corporate jaunts may be dead for good. Across the U.S., companies as varied as Advanced Micro Devices , Xerox , Cisco Systems, AstraZeneca, and Adecco are cutting internal business travel (grinding from corporate office to office) by as much as 50%.

That's not to say all business travel is going extinct. Globalization has expanded workplace networks exponentially. We all need to collaborate with—and stay connected to—more people than ever. Still, a growing number of managers are thinking twice before jumping on a plane.

The super surge in oil prices and resulting spike in airfares is just one reason companies are ordering their road warriors home. Factor in, too, the misery of modern air travel, which has de-glamorized the business junket. HR types also have a new appreciation for how the frequent-flier lifestyle can wreck executives' health and family lives. And they have come to realize that jetting off for a one-hour meeting, while instinctual for corporate strivers, is rarely productive. [/B]

Plus, let's not forget that flying less is a great way to burnish a green image: Companies are racing to cut their carbon footprint—of which air travel is often a big piece. "What we're trying to do is keep people off the plane," says Rick Dipper, director of corporate responsibility at Nortel Networks, which aims to slash internal travel by 50% and overall travel by 25% this year. "People are really becoming conscious of the environmental costs of business travel. That's a sea change that tells me we are probably not going to go back to where we were."

So, if managers aren't flying to meetings, what are they doing? Using newfangled technology that is finally delivering the kind of Star Trek-y, space- and time-shifting experiences that tech executives have blabbered on about forever. Videoconferencing, Web-enabled meetings, online collaboration tools—all are giving workers the ability to dart around the globe from their desk chairs.

Take HP's Halo and Cisco's TelePresence technologies, which cost up to $300,000 a pop. Chief information officers of big companies say the systems usually pay for themselves within nine months. These machines bear no resemblance to the grainy, herky-jerky technology of yore. Researchers studying bodily reactions found that co-workers on different continents experienced the same chemical responses as they would in face-to-face meetings.

The new technologies, says Procter & Gamble's chief information officer, Filippo Passerini, "empower collaboration, so you really can be there without leaving here. They are saving money and enabling us to collaborate and innovate faster, smarter, and more sustainably than ever before."

This year accounting firm Grant Thornton's travel and meetings director, Cheryl Geib, canceled three company offsites, involving 100 executives each, to cut costs. Geib is replacing them with online, virtual meetings. Executives are thrilled. "We won't ever go back," says Geib.

Consulting firm BDO Seidman is pushing employees to meet virtually by using WebEx technology, which lets co-workers across the globe scrawl on whiteboards and share documents. The company is saving $1 million a year. "It's not just about travel reduction, it's also about increasing communication," says the firm's training and development director, MaryEm Musser. Workplace researchers agree, reporting that huddling with people more frequently in short bursts of time is more productive than flying off to long, drawn-out confabs.

How times have changed. Back in the day—say, eight years ago—road warriors measured status by how many frequent-flier miles they accrued, their admission to VIP lounges, and all the cool people they met at conferences. "When you say you were able to have a meeting in London and then go home and have dinner with your children," says Nortel's Dipper, "that's what people are jealous of now."

ADDENDUMS:

British Business Deplanes
A report released on May 16 by Britain's World Wildlife Fund—Traveling Light: Why the UK's Biggest Companies are Seeking Alternatives to Flying—found that 89% of 350 large companies surveyed said they intended to reduce employee travel within the decade. Three-quarters also want more government investment in high-speed rail; they predict their road warriors will be spending more and more time on trains.

Fewer Miles for Short Trips
United Airlines' (UAUA) frequent fliers have always received a minimum of 500 miles, no matter how short a trip they took. Not anymore, writes travel blogger Rick Seaney at FareCompare.com. "Starting July 1, if you fly, say, LaGuardia to Dulles, you WON'T get 500 frequent-flier miles; you will ONLY get the actual number of miles the trip took—about 230 miles. Just one more way the airlines are cutting back in the face of those off-the-chart jet fuel prices."

Last edited by JetPiedmont; 05-26-2008 at 01:41 PM.
JetPiedmont is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 05:42 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Global Express Captain
Posts: 81
Default

Yep, it's a new world out there. Airlines will have to learn to adjust or perish. I am in Corporate aviation now and we can see the windfall, looking at our charter bookings and sells of new corporate jets, this segment of aviation is growing at a very healthy rate, some of the bigger new jets like the Gulfstream 550 or the Global Express have a 2 years backlog. Gulfstream announced recently the new 650 model, the Company has already received over 350 LOI, and the thing isn't built yet! I have a lot of friends still with the Majors, I know how tough things are, perfect storm scenario it seems..Good luck to all of you.
Globaldriver53 is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 05:46 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 440
Default

"People are really becoming conscious of the environmental costs of business travel. That's a sea change that tells me we are probably not going to go back to where we were."
If I am not mistaken, I believe airliners account for less than 2% of carbon emissions. Environmentalism is going to cost economies more money than high oil prices will.
Led Zep is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 06:43 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Oldfreightdawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: B-737
Posts: 392
Default

I remember FedEx and their "electronic mail" debut in 1984. It was going to replace airline travel. It was nothing more than a FAX machine. Technology comes and goes but people will always travel.
Oldfreightdawg is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 07:37 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: No to large RJs
Posts: 369
Default

Originally Posted by Globaldriver53 View Post
Yep, it's a new world out there. Airlines will have to learn to adjust or perish. I am in Corporate aviation now and we can see the windfall, looking at our charter bookings and sells of new corporate jets, this segment of aviation is growing at a very healthy rate, some of the bigger new jets like the Gulfstream 550 or the Global Express have a 2 years backlog. Gulfstream announced recently the new 650 model, the Company has already received over 350 LOI, and the thing isn't built yet! I have a lot of friends still with the Majors, I know how tough things are, perfect storm scenario it seems..Good luck to all of you.
I have to raise the BS flag on this post. I have seen these kinds of posts from the corporate side of the tracks too frequently. You need to remove those rose colored lenses. Oil is killing everyone, INCLUDING corporate. I actually think with respect to corporate, high oil prices will help the airlines gain lost business travelers. At least until airline management is able to pass along the true cost of a ticket. I personally know of three flight departments of large corporations that cut 75% or closed shop altogether recently. People I know who have their own corporate plane with small companies aren't flying much at all. They have told me because of the changes to their bottom line within the company itself, they are flying with the airlines. Gulfstream may be doing quite well but I would love to see the breakdown of where those deliveries are going. I would bet the vast majority are not domestic. NetJets I'm sure has some coming but I would be willing to bet their new fractional shares (new customers) have dropped. I would not be feeling safe even there right now with oil where it is today. From what I understand their business model is predicated on selling those shares of the new planes they purchase. If oil is squeezing all these companies (ie cutting into profits), they won't be buying quarter shares. As far as 350 LOI, that doesn't say much at all to me. Letter of Intent is just that, Intent. Deliveries are what count. I have a broker friend who sells corporate jets and I think he would beg to differ on the corp jet market right now. If corporate guys think this is going to be like it was after 9-11, they have another thing coming. We are all in this sinking ship due to oil. Not just aviation either, American business in general. Our economy is built around cheap energy. Take that away and even the wealthy feel the pain.

Best of Luck to ALL of us!
Dawgs
DAWGS is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 08:02 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GauleyPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: BE-20, RA390
Posts: 644
Default

Originally Posted by DAWGS View Post
If corporate guys think this is going to be like it was after 9-11, they have another thing coming. We are all in this sinking ship due to oil. Not just aviation either, American business in general. Our economy is built around cheap energy. Take that away and even the wealthy feel the pain.

Best of Luck to ALL of us!
Dawgs
This corporate guy is on guard.

Gulfstream, Cessna, and Hawker Beechcraft are booming---because of the weak dollar making their products more affordable in the international market.
GauleyPilot is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:47 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,902
Default

Yeah I know… crap flows down hill. But it will, eventually flow laterally across the pond. The good folks across the Atlantic will soon experience what is being felt in the US. Not just high oil, but a down turn in their economy too. And the first item shed of the books??? the corporate toys.
captjns is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 03:36 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 937
Default

Originally Posted by Led Zep View Post
If I am not mistaken, I believe airliners account for less than 2% of carbon emissions. Environmentalism is going to cost economies more money than high oil prices will.
says who? you?
Zapata is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 05:09 AM
  #9  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737-FO
Posts: 23
Default

I tend to agree that corporate/charter is flattening out, we have seen our flying dropping by over 50%, both 91 and 135 over the past 3 months. The used aircraft market is getting saturated as well. It is a little better overseas, but they are feeling the downturn too.
NorskAir is offline  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:18 AM
  #10  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
Yeah I know… crap flows down hill. But it will, eventually flow laterally across the pond. The good folks across the Atlantic will soon experience what is being felt in the US.
Oh, you mean like here in the UK where gas costs $10/gallon?

Sorry, but Europe has had "high oil prices" for decades all ready.

The opposite is actually true. Soon the US will experience the high oil prices that Europe has had as a normal part of their way of life for a long time.
Hacker15e is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Aviation Law
10
09-20-2008 12:50 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Major
21
04-03-2008 07:07 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
12-08-2005 06:50 AM
Sir James
Major
1
07-17-2005 08:47 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices