Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Allegiant's new planes >

Allegiant's new planes

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Allegiant's new planes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2008, 03:23 AM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Bryan1726's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 14
Default Allegiant's new planes

Ok rumors are flying all over the place about Allegiant getting new planes or next to new planes. Its ranged from 757's to A321's. Personaly I would like to see 737-800's but my question to all of you is this, are any of these rumors true and if so what type of airplane would they be looking at and what your pick be if you had the choice?
Bryan1726 is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 05:43 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ERJ135's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: CR7 Capt
Posts: 1,621
Default

I'd be willing to bet they go for the airbus 319 or 320. Just like Spirit and JB. Seems to be a favorite for LCC's. If it was my choice I'd like to see the 737-700 like what SWA and Westjet do. Any bases for the NE opening?
ERJ135 is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 06:01 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyByCable's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 337
Default

I think that some ERJ-170 series planes would be very cost effective.
FlyByCable is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 06:04 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Jet Pilot
Posts: 797
Default

L-1011's because I think they would look very cool in that paint job.
Lab Rat is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 12:08 PM
  #5  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Bryan1726's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 14
Default

Hmmmm about the 700's they would lose 13 seats of possible revenue so i dont think thats on the table for that reason. About NE bases Rockford has been disscussed some but nothing in the works as of yet.
Bryan1726 is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 12:20 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: e190
Posts: 929
Default

Originally Posted by FlyByCable View Post
I think that some ERJ-170 series planes would be very cost effective.

the erj 170-190 is not cost efficient at all compared to the CRJ 700-900 series. why would they limit their aircraft size to a regional aircraft marketed to fit into the limits of majors scope clauses? their crew costs would stay the same and move more people with 737-A320.
newarkblows is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 01:08 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Left
Posts: 192
Default

while lcc's or ulcc's, or what ever their marketing depts call them now,love airbus's, i dont see g4 getting them. This is due to the fact that most of g4's miniscule outstations dont have the necessary infrastructure, specifically beltloaders, that loading baggage into an airbus would require (when ever i see an Allegiant maddog somewhere its being loaded direct from the baggage cart to the cargo pit). I dont see stramlined Allegiant taking on this expenditure unless a screamin deal from airbus warrants it.
319wisperer is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 04:46 PM
  #8  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 20
Default

Correct me if I am wrong, but the major reason Allegiant is doing well is that they have aircraft that dont have to fly all the time to cover expenses. Newer aircraft would change that.
c9skytrain is offline  
Old 06-19-2008, 05:13 PM
  #9  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Bryan1726's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 14
Default

Even if Allegiant parks planes from day to day to save money dont you think the money they would save on newer a/c that are more fuel efficiant and dont requier such a hands-on maintaince program would allow them to turn a profit in the up coming quarter. I mean lets face it, what Allegiant is doing is working but dont you think that at some point they have to reavaluate their economical and finiacial outlook and say the rising cost of fuel and the amount of fuel the md-80 requiers are just not going to add up even if they sell out every flight the airline would profit more by replacing the md-80. As far as G4's out stations wouldn't the airport be responsible for updating their equipment to handle a change of a/c. Besides G4 for the most part contracts out its ground handlers at out stations, even the Florida hub SFB is contracted out to the lowest bidder.
Bryan1726 is offline  
Old 06-20-2008, 04:43 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STILL GROUNDED's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 1,105
Default

Originally Posted by newarkblows View Post
the erj 170-190 is not cost efficient at all compared to the CRJ 700-900 series. why would they limit their aircraft size to a regional aircraft marketed to fit into the limits of majors scope clauses? their crew costs would stay the same and move more people with 737-A320.
Maybe they are considering passenger comfort for a change. I hear it every day how people prefer the E-170-5 over any Crj. You can stand up and even put you luggage in the bin over your head.
STILL GROUNDED is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jelloy683
Regional
13
08-14-2007 02:54 PM
jelloy683
Major
4
08-13-2007 05:24 PM
SkyHigh
Major
109
04-12-2006 09:00 AM
Was That For Us?
Major
0
10-20-2005 09:55 PM
Sir James
Major
1
10-09-2005 06:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices