![]() |
AA Question
Anyone from AA:
Has the company announced the retirement schedule for parking the MD's? (or has it even been planned yet?) Not a flame. Just curious, as I heard something from a friend who claims to be in the know. |
No schedule for parking MDs yet. In fact they actually brought one or two out of the desert recently due to fuel prices dropping. Ditto for the Airbus. My guess is that as long as fuel prices stay low, their schedule for parking airplanes is up in the air (pun intended. ;))
73 |
OK, thanks.
I heard that 200 MD's to be parked by end of 2009. |
The slower the better, I love those things...especially as a passenger.
|
They AMR works, they'll probably start pulling the 72's out of the desert. Then when fule goes back up they'll lose so much money they'll need ask for concessions....:rolleyes:
|
Obviously their long term goal is to replace the MD-80 with a similar aircraft. Right now they are using the 737-800. I don't see them bringing 300-400 737s on property though. They are probably going to order a bunch of the 737 replacement that will come out someday with the 787 technology and efficiency.
|
Originally Posted by Roper92
(Post 529384)
The slower the better, I love those things...especially as a passenger.
|
Being that you can't even get new A320 or 737 orders before 2018 the MD-80's make even more sense.
|
Originally Posted by Rotorhead
(Post 530898)
Being that you can't even get new A320 or 737 orders before 2018 the MD-80's make even more sense.
|
Aircraft that have been paid for long ago that burn a little more fuel are still less expensive than fuel efficient aircraft with huge lease payments.
A number of the MD-80s they picked up from TWA were among the newest out there. |
Originally Posted by Jake Wheeler
(Post 531025)
Then they should buy used ones. Oil prices will be back on the rise in another year, sooner if the Middle East goes up in flames. If memory serves, once oil goes over $80/barrel, flying MD-80's becomes economically unfeasible against more fuel efficient aircraft. Isn't this the primary reason Midwest is now parking their little fleet?
|
Fuel efficient, what is fuel efficient about E-145s carrying 50 pax (assuming they are even full or not weight restricted) at 2400 pounds an hour? The Maddog can carry just under 150 on 6000 pounds / hr and their bags too!!! The RJs will be the first to get the boot.
|
Originally Posted by Rotorhead
(Post 531209)
Fuel efficient, what is fuel efficient about E-145s carrying 50 pax (assuming they are even full or not weight restricted) at 2400 pounds an hour? The Maddog can carry just under 150 on 6000 pounds / hr and their bags too!!! The RJs will be the first to get the boot.
Face it, neither are fuel efficient. Time to trade the E-145s in for Q400s and park the MD-80s. Are you a Delta pilot or a regional feeding Delta? |
Originally Posted by Rotorhead
(Post 531207)
other countries are buying their own domestic capacity as fast as it pours off the assembly lines.
|
Originally Posted by Rotorhead
(Post 531207)
You have got to be kidding, do you think there is a pool of used or pre-owned 737-800s and A320 with CFM-56 motors (the good engine) just sitting around? NO.. Were .
Jake, my base airport, GYR, is used for storage. When I was there last week I noticed the storage area was the most full I've ever seen it, almost at capacity. Ken |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands