![]() |
No Classes for 09 for SWA
Just saw on the SWAPA forum there will be no new hire classes for 2009.
|
Originally Posted by River6
(Post 533151)
Just saw on the SWAPA forum there will be no new hire classes for 2009.
|
At least they keep you guys informed.
|
Originally Posted by River6
(Post 533151)
Just saw on the SWAPA forum there will be no new hire classes for 2009.
|
Originally Posted by BoredwLife
(Post 533239)
At least they keep you guys informed.
|
No one is immune to this economy...no surprise.
|
Originally Posted by UCLAbruins
(Post 533277)
At least they're not furloughing anybody. It does suck for the junior guys on reserve, specially if they commute, I'm sure this sucks even more for the poolies.
|
Originally Posted by SAABaroowski
(Post 533294)
Well..................I would imagine it sucks EVEN more for guys that are on the street, I am sure they would'nt mind sitting reserve for SWA:D
|
I don't buy it. How can they open 3 new cities in 2009 with no growth.
|
Originally Posted by exp96
(Post 534071)
I don't buy it. How can they open 3 new cities in 2009 with no growth.
|
Looks like another coat of sunscreen is in order....
Not to sound like a complainer, but wondering if anyone has any input of something else put out by the People Department in the email yesterday. They specified that the "poolie" status is not an offer for employment, and also said if 18 months transpire between interview and actual hire date, the candidate may need to reinterview??? Anyone have any insight to this? |
Originally Posted by Hornet8
(Post 533241)
That is what they said in Dec 07 for 2008 hiring when I went to Higher Power. Then they hired in 2008. Anything could happen!
|
Just Keep Swimming. . .
When I got the call telling me I was in the pool, they said that I "was selected to continue in the process". I thought that was interesting wording at the time, I guess I know why now.
I think if it goes past 18 months and we keep our noses clean, we'll be OK. . . . I hope! :eek: I have been told, PD has a history of giving out very conservative time lines to folks in the pool. Maybe this will be the same. Not saying this is intentional, they are just telling us what they are being told. I'm glad they are keeping us in the loop. Don't get me wrong, I understand the current plan of zero growth in 09. I also know that they change directions very quickly there and while not holding my breath, I'll hope for something to change for the better, soon. Guess it's a good thing we made those "modifications" to the pool, looks like we'll get to take advantage of them a little longer. :D Keep smiling poolies, we'll get there. . . eventually. |
Originally Posted by BaconUSMC
(Post 534094)
Looks like another coat of sunscreen is in order....
Not to sound like a complainer, but wondering if anyone has any input of something else put out by the People Department in the email yesterday. They specified that the "poolie" status is not an offer for employment, and also said if 18 months transpire between interview and actual hire date, the candidate may need to reinterview??? Anyone have any insight to this? Everyone is told the same thing regarding being a poolie. When you get called, you are not offered employment. That doesn't happen until a class date is offered. The 18 month thing has always been there as far as I know. Everyone who has waited in the pool for a while has had to update their paperwork (including drug test, PRIA, etc.) as necessary. If you are wanting to know what you will need to do, just call PD and ask. They are very willing to answer those questions. Don't fret too much about all the negative vibes. The "no hiring" outlook is as of right now. That can change in a flash. Good luck and keep the faith everyone. |
Volaris and Westjet should be hiring, we're growing them by double digits!
|
Yeah Westjet and Volaris are expecting double digit growth. Mr. Kelly and SWAPA sold our pilots out. SWAPA is a selfserving org that is a extension of management. All the guys at SWAPA are lobbying hard to one day go to work at the GO. I would expect nothing other from the union.
|
Sorry Guys - welcome to our world. AMR has had severe stagnation for some time now. I'm a '93 hire and probably won't make junior CA for another 5 years (age 50!). No doubt many US Air guys can relate. Hope it works out for SWA pilots, but I'm numb to the pain.
|
Originally Posted by Bond
(Post 534079)
Higher fleet utilization combined with increased block hours (more productive trips), they do it all the time everywhere else
|
I talked to the head of pilot hiring a few weeks back. He mentioned something to the effect that a lack of currency created some problems for a few people going through training last year. My guess is after 18 months if you don't meet the currency requirement you will no longer be in the pool.
|
i know a guy that was recently kicked out of the pool. hope they dont make a habit of it.
|
Originally Posted by dojetdriver
(Post 534386)
Not at our company. And I KNOW we're under the control of somebody else, but with the amount of flying we do, there's gotta be a better way.
|
Originally Posted by myoface
(Post 534673)
i know a guy that was recently kicked out of the pool. hope they dont make a habit of it.
Anyway, the letter from the PD, although disappointing, just proves why I chose SWA in the first place. They've communicated with me. They didn't have to, yet they made time to be honest with folks they've really only spent a round trip to Dallas on. |
dont know all the details, but i will try to find out...
|
No hiring in 09? Is this due more to everyone sticking around past 60? Anyone know the retirement numbers at SWA over the next few years? Certainly puts a damper on your hiring if no one leaves for the next 5 years and very little growth....:mad:
|
Originally Posted by JustUnderPar
(Post 534835)
No hiring in 09? Is this due more to everyone sticking around past 60? Anyone know the retirement numbers at SWA over the next few years? Certainly puts a damper on your hiring if no one leaves for the next 5 years and very little growth....:mad:
Very true. Unfortuantely this dead horse has been beat. I don't know the retirement numbers, but I think more people will stick around after 60 not just because they need the money, but because they really like working for SWA. Other airline's pilot stick around because they need the money. |
The SWAPA president wrote in his weekly blog today that we are overstaffed by 200.
|
Originally Posted by skidmark
(Post 534922)
...but I think more people will stick around after 60 not just because they need the money, but because they really like working for SWA. Other airline's pilot stick around because they need the money.
|
Originally Posted by ⌐ AV8OR WANNABE
(Post 535712)
C'mon now, one thing all over 60 pilots - including the SWA pilots - have in common is they're staying for the love of extra money and not aviation as you imply... :rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by SWAcapt
(Post 535910)
Your naivete is staggering. You attempt to speak for everyone over 60. I've been flying for over 33 years and still love it. Is there no possibility in your mind that someone could be happy in their employment? Sorry life has delt you such a lousy hand. Most money problems are spending problems. I may or may not fly past 60, but it will have nothing to do with money. When it's no longer fun, I will quit and what I have in the bank is what I have. My happiness is in my heart and is not controlled by my employer. Never has been... never will.
My reply was a response to the previous kool-aid drinker who honestly believes SWA pilots are staying past 60 for different reasons than pilots at other airlines... We all might be working for different airlines however, I don't believe SWA pilots stay past 60 mainly because they love flying (and their company) while other pilots stay because they "have to." I simply don't buy that... |
My apologies if I misunderstood your intent. I only took umbrage with the your "only" statement. We all have our own motives and motivations. Mine have just never been money motivated. We do have many of those types at SWA but their motivations are theirs and not mine. I do not sit in judgment of them. My time is more valuable than any employer could pay me. The average SWA pilot flew over 800 hours last year, I flew 472 and I'm good with that.
|
Originally Posted by SWAcapt
(Post 535939)
My apologies if I misunderstood your intent. I only took umbrage with the your "only" statement. We all have our own motives and motivations. Mine have just never been money motivated. We do have many of those types at SWA but their motivations are theirs and not mine. I do not sit in judgment of them. My time is more valuable than any employer could pay me. The average SWA pilot flew over 800 hours last year, I flew 472 and I'm good with that.
|
Originally Posted by SWAcapt
(Post 535939)
My apologies if I misunderstood your intent. I only took umbrage with the your "only" statement. We all have our own motives and motivations. Mine have just never been money motivated. We do have many of those types at SWA but their motivations are theirs and not mine. I do not sit in judgment of them. My time is more valuable than any employer could pay me. The average SWA pilot flew over 800 hours last year, I flew 472 and I'm good with that.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:37 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands