Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Question for AA73 and 7576FO >

Question for AA73 and 7576FO

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Question for AA73 and 7576FO

Old 03-05-2009, 09:31 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Delta Colors Busholio
Posts: 233
Default Question for AA73 and 7576FO

I picked this off msn.com under key developments for AMR. Is AMR cashing out it's capital in the ATR 72s? This is an interesting move to me, much like the sale of American Beacon was. These guys are tough to follow.

AMR Corp.'s American Airlines Announces Sale and Leaseback of 39 ATR 72 Aircraft
December 2, 2008Nordic Aviation Capital A/S (NAC) and KIRK Kapital A/S announced an agreement for a sale and leaseback transaction with AMR Leasing Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR Corp. for 39 ATR 72 aircraft operated by Executive Airlines, Inc., also a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR Corp. doing business as "American Eagle". AMR Leasing Corporation will sell the 39 ATR 72 aircraft to an entity that will lease the aircraft to NK Aviation Limited, Ireland, a newly formed joint venture between NAC and Kirk Kapital A/S. Executive Airlines will lease the aircraft back through a sublease structure and will continue to be the operator of the aircraft. NAC will be the servicer for the aircraft.
Rotorhead is offline  
Old 03-05-2009, 10:33 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Jessemh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 37
Default

This is a question for American Eagle ATR pilots, not American Mainline pilots.

Right?
Jessemh is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 05:53 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by RJ Pilot View Post
They are the same.
LOL !!!!! (you must be a new guy).

Well, there's speculation as to several motives. One involves cleaning up the books of Executive and another involves future purchases of aircraft. Executive has a Operating Certificate that may come in handy for AMR in the future in one of several ways. AMR wants more operations to go to the "large" RJ segment (70-seats and above) and also wants at least two operators to insure whipsawing remains in place. They freely admit as much in their contract proposal to the APA (which they know would be soundly rejected).

Any money paid to another operator for THEIR profit is money lost (some call it "leakage"). Many believe AMR wants a scenario of two seperate (and highly profitable) short/medium domestic operators flying 70-100 seat large RJ's and selling American Eagle, Inc and modifying Eecutives Airlines, Inc. could be a future plan to insure AMR gets their cake and can eat it too. They could (in the right fashion) control these two competing carriers and reap all the profits.

Of course, there is one primary thing that is standing in the way ; Mainline Labor. It's NOT just about pilot scope, but about the ability to operate these aircraft with labor costs low enough to insure maximum profit using competitive costs...........and like it or not, the competition is already defined and will never change. Look around and you'll notice more and more CRJ-900's and EMB-175/190's appearing with labor costs at (or below) those currently at Eagle. We wont even metion the hundreds upon hundreds of 70-76 seat (many mixed-class) aircraft out there. ALL the mainline labor groups at AA are intertwined (whether they like it or not) and it is the TOTAL picture there that must be considered. AMR has virtually NONE of this and knows to be a profitable corporation in the future, it has no alternative but to compete in like fashion and do so without the current hamstring situation that is killing it.

For AMR, timing is everything here. They need more time to insure the competitive landscape will be what they think it will and to line their ducks up for what they believe will be ultimately necessary to resolve their problems once and for all.

The ultimate future (er,.....lets say my opinion) will involve AA being an International and long-range/transcon carrier (it will also operate in selected medium-range markets) roughly half it's current size that competes with other high-cost carriers. The other will be a dual short/medum range domestic carrier arrangement operating up to 100 seat jets with lower labor costs that will grow substantially. Eagle itself will probably shrink noticably, but another carrier (I wonder who ?) will be the primary growth vehicle.

2 things are most important over the next couple of years for AMR to achieve this ultimate goal (and free itself from the currently hopeless rope around their necks)...........time and timing. They still need time to align certain things to insure timing is right to reach the ultimate outcome. They're not stupid and they're not sitting around not planning. They're palnning and biding their time and there will be a time when the moment is at hand to complete the process. That moment will be triggered by an entity OTHER then AMR.

AMR is doing what's necessary to insure they're ready when that moment arrives and that my friends you can bank on. The profession of airline piloting is nearing the bottom of the long downward slide its been on for 15 years and now its too late to go forward to the past. The only way to change it is to get a magic De Lorean and go "Back to the Future" for a "re-do". ALPA fumbled the ball when Comair introduced the RJ in the early ninties, by not fiercly protecting this type of flying in its infancy. They failed again, by not insuring regional feed networks were closely aligned to their associated major networks with cohesive labor integration (SSL's, transfer/protection arraingements) that INCLUDED these pilots intead of DIVIDING them. The APA could have seen that even as recent as 5-7 years ago and wrapped their arms around the Eagle pilots not for the Eagle pilots, but ultimately FOR THEM. Mutual allies with common interests would have had a much better chance of shaping AMR and AA for a different and more beneficial future for all, instead of the hopeless and permamant division that now will likley result is one entity watching the other entity engage a final battle that will produce some decent results for half and ultimately sacrifice the rest.

At AMR, it seems the final play will play itself out and the ultimate casuality will be the profession that "once was". The old saying comes to mind......."keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer". Again, the best bet was for ALPA (and the APA) to make ONE profession of pilots instead of fragmented adversaries (or even enemies).

Ahhh, if only we could go back in time...............................
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 06:04 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7576FO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: 737 CA MIA
Posts: 1,042
Default

Originally Posted by Rotorhead View Post
I picked this off msn.com under key developments for AMR. Is AMR cashing out it's capital in the ATR 72s? This is an interesting move to me, much like the sale of American Beacon was. These guys are tough to follow.

AMR Corp.'s American Airlines Announces Sale and Leaseback of 39 ATR 72 Aircraft
December 2, 2008Nordic Aviation Capital A/S (NAC) and KIRK Kapital A/S announced an agreement for a sale and leaseback transaction with AMR Leasing Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR Corp. for 39 ATR 72 aircraft operated by Executive Airlines, Inc., also a wholly-owned subsidiary of AMR Corp. doing business as "American Eagle". AMR Leasing Corporation will sell the 39 ATR 72 aircraft to an entity that will lease the aircraft to NK Aviation Limited, Ireland, a newly formed joint venture between NAC and Kirk Kapital A/S. Executive Airlines will lease the aircraft back through a sublease structure and will continue to be the operator of the aircraft. NAC will be the servicer for the aircraft.

Great question. I do not know. I will send a couple e-mails and see what I can find.
I also have respect for Eagle and it's pilots. Someting that need said more often. I was a commuter pilot.
7576
7576FO is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 07:12 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Good analysis, 'eaglefly'.

Mistakes have been made in the past. Still, I wouldn't give up hope. There's no time like the present.

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
The old saying comes to mind......."keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer". Again, the best bet was for ALPA (and the APA) to make ONE profession of pilots instead of fragmented adversaries (or even enemies).
Instead of that saying, I'd consider "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". It's time for APA and ALPA to get together on this one and put their differences aside for the time being. I'm not advocating APA and ALPA merging, just working together temporarily to improve the lot of all the pilots who get paychecks from AMR.

Last edited by Sniper; 03-06-2009 at 07:16 AM. Reason: added text
Sniper is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 07:41 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 390
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
The APA could have seen that even as recent as 5-7 years ago and wrapped their arms around the Eagle pilots not for the Eagle pilots, but ultimately FOR THEM. Mutual allies with common interests would have had a much better chance of shaping AMR and AA for a different and more beneficial future for all, instead of the hopeless and permamant division that now will likley result is one entity watching the other entity engage a final battle that will produce some decent results for half and ultimately sacrifice the rest.
It's not just the pilots involved with this. You're talking about all employee groups at AMR. The price demanded by AMR for combining the companies would have been HUGE and paid by mainline ONLY in the form of dumbing down compensation and benefits. In short, the idea of folding in AE into AA WAS and IS simply a cheap pipedream that ain't gonna happen. AE ALPA has ZERO leverage in the deal with their current long term labor contract and would be the only one to benefit. Even with a combined company the threat of pilots willing to work on the cheap wouldn't go away. You need to remember what company you're dealing with here. With AMR any concession will NEVER be enough until you can get below Great Lakes and Mesa in employee costs.

If AA wants a bankruptcy contract, at least from the APA, they're going to have to take it to bankrupcy and management may have to forgo their rich bonuses for a year or so. The pilots at least are fed-up with business as usual at AMR. I've got no problem with a bankruptcy. Bring it on. When the senior pilots smell a BK you'll see probably 1500 senior captains immediately retire. AA management says they need to retain their "top talent" with these fabulous bonuses. A good bankruptcy might clean out a lot of dead wood and dead thinking at Centerport. Who knows, they might even get a couple of real leaders up there.
Wheels up is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 08:55 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Wheels up View Post
It's not just the pilots involved with this. You're talking about all employee groups at AMR. The price demanded by AMR for combining the companies would have been HUGE and paid by mainline ONLY in the form of dumbing down compensation and benefits. In short, the idea of folding in AE into AA WAS and IS simply a cheap pipedream that ain't gonna happen. AE ALPA has ZERO leverage in the deal with their current long term labor contract and would be the only one to benefit. Even with a combined company the threat of pilots willing to work on the cheap wouldn't go away. You need to remember what company you're dealing with here. With AMR any concession will NEVER be enough until you can get below Great Lakes and Mesa in employee costs. *If AA wants a bankruptcy contract, at least from the APA, they're going to have to take it to bankrupcy and management may have to forgo their rich bonuses for a year or so. The pilots at least are fed-up with business as usual at AMR. I've got no problem with a bankruptcy. Bring it on. When the senior pilots smell a BK you'll see probably 1500 senior captains immediately retire. AA management says they need to retain their "top talent" with these fabulous bonuses. A good bankruptcy might clean out a lot of dead wood and dead thinking at Centerport. Who knows, they might even get a couple of real leaders up there.
deleted deleted

Last edited by eaglefly; 03-06-2009 at 09:07 AM.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 09:44 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 390
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
It's time for APA and ALPA to get together on this one and put their differences aside for the time being. I'm not advocating APA and ALPA merging, just working together temporarily to improve the lot of all the pilots who get paychecks from AMR.
What differences are you speaking about? Please be specific.

Work together? How? Specifically? What practical, concrete, and actionable leverage does AE bring to the table besides "moral" support (as if AMR cares about employee morale)? Considering their long term contract + several years of negotiations, what can they do besides sit on the sidelines? Spare me the standard "kumbaya" please.

APA pilots don't have anything left to give. It's all been taken by the 2003 rape and cost of living since then. And AMR wants to kill off probably another 1000 mainline pilot jobs through productivity "improvements" and taking a meat cleaver to scope. The prevailing thought is that AMR's bottom line is pay stays as it is, but all benefits and productivity get dumbed-down once again.

Right now AE ALPA is toothless and AMR knows it. AE ALPA is in the box and AMR is not about to let them out of it, regardless of what the APA does.
Wheels up is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 10:22 AM
  #9  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,549
Default

Originally Posted by Wheels up View Post
Work together? How? Specifically? What practical, concrete, and actionable leverage does AE bring to the table besides "moral" support (as if AMR cares about employee morale)? Considering their long term contract + several years of negotiations, what can they do besides sit on the sidelines? Spare me the standard "kumbaya" please.
AE ALPA can be the carrier to operate in the 70-100 seat range that AMR is trying to break into. Nobody wants to see the flying leave the AMR family, so IF it was absolutely necessary for APA to give up some room on scope they could include in the clause "all flying will be performed by wholly owned AMR carriers" or something of the sorts. AE ALPA can be this carrier to perform flying at competitive market rates. AE ALPA can offer employment to those on furlough on the APA list to fly the 100 seaters and in turn all future AA vacancies will be filled by AE pilots. (Yes, I know we had a letter 3 before and it was a disaster... we've learned our lessons and if done right it could be beneficial to all parties) There should be no need for AMR mgmt to outsource any future flying.
Flyby1206 is offline  
Old 03-06-2009, 11:05 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

sorry guys been flying all night...

i'm not really that up to speed on the AE side of the equation, other than the fact that AMR will always try to keep us separate in order to maintain the divide and conquer strategy. it will probably never change. that said, i have several friends at AE and they are a good group of guys.
aa73 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices