Airline Pilot Central Forums
1  2  3  4 
Page 3 of 4
Go to

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   American Airlines 1420 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/40074-american-airlines-1420-a.html)

7576FO 05-17-2009 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aa73 (Post 612172)
I feel compelled to chime in on this post because 7576 brings up some very good points, along with some minor inacurracies.

Yes, AA is somewhat behind the rest of the industry in terms of modern CRM. We have a very Captain-oriented cockpit culture. CAs do all the PAs. CAs do all the engine starts. CAs turn on/off exterior lights and sterilize/desterilize the cabin through 10,000 - even if they are PF. CAs pull paperwork, flight plans, etc. Little stuff like that that should be more redistributed bewteen PF/PNF. But that's ancestral worship for ya. I've learned to do my own checks and balances. I always review the flight plan/performance in Sabre before heading out to the a/c. I always go over notams/wx, etc. I offer to do PAs if the CA asks.

Our Human Factors class is an offshoot of CRM, and I think it works well. We cover the same exact stuff I used to hear when I had CRM training at ACA. Just a different name.

But in the end, AA's cockpit culture is not too removed from the rest of the industry. You are as safe flying on AA as any major/legacy airline out there. In fact our pilots have had their hands full recently in dealing with a number of engine failures and other incidents in which they've performed flawlessly - and obviously a couple here and there where they could have done better (just like any other airline pilot group.)

AA1420 happened because, as 7576 points out, you had a chief pilot mission hacker paired with a new hire just off IOE. Fatigue played a big role as well. It was not the first of its kind, nor will it be the last. Let's all make sure we learn from it.

In the end, AA needs to change its CA ancestral worship philosophy and start incorporating the whole "FO is a CA in training" concept. We had that at ACA and it really accomplished a lot from a CRM and safety point of view.

Fly safe all,
73


73, good response. I also review the paperwork on Sabre. But the JP* is not always ready. I'll review the JPD of the previous days flight. That does not tell me Notams or anything significant. Then, as you know it's get out to the aircraft, put on the vest, set everything up and then if there's time I can go thru the 1/4" stack of dot matrix printed messages and notams and wx package.
In the past i've sent emails to request new Sabre codes for FO's and FB's. Yes imagine that! It would include everything but BS J8's and weather verbage outlooks. I would print it out and bam off to security.
If the idea of a HF class that continues to let crews fly the Atlantic where the FB only has a taxi chart for the destination airport is suitable CRM, then by all means the Ancestor worship is working fine here at AA.
I'm not based in DFW, In the emails and phone calls that I make I am probably just a loud mouth co-pilot in Miami.
I am not some disatisfied FO. Here's what I am, i'm motivated and in touch with safety commitees. In the future you will see me on the training commitees and safety (CRM- yes, I will push for that until I retire).
Also, the sim-p's are too old. (there i said it) Last march my sim-pilot instructor was 79 years old. There was no 2 hour pre-sim brief. It was 1 hour of how he flew for Brannif.
I followed that up with 7 phone calls and 4 e-mails. I had to be careful as not to be age discriminatory in anything I said or wrote.
Same checkride, my CA called in sick. My seat filler CA was a 72 yr old sim-pilot that also NEVER flew for American Airlines. Also, same checkride, in walks real FAA and obviously he is over 65 years old.
There is alot of stuff that can and needs to be changed at AA.
But my whole point here is CRM, and it starts with sharing the paperwork. And I will be a jerk if I have to ask or state 3 times every flight "Where is the paperwork?" "Is there a reason you do not want me to see the notams?"
7576

eaglefly 05-17-2009 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7576FO (Post 611788)
The Little Rock crash should not be attributed to OnTime as a cause. It should and properly did go down as "Mission Hacker" The CA had personal reasons to continue.
1. Ego, "I've never crashed yet"
2. "I'm a chief pilot, I'm the best, I can do this"
3."I've got a new FO, I'll show him how to do this"
4."I've got to get to the hotel, i've got things to do"
Sorry to be flippant, but that is what happened.

Even after that at AA I was flying into DFW with a check airman. Wind at DFW was 310 @48 Gust to 56. One runway ops. I was checking wx at everywhere and figuring out where we'd go. The check airman told me "Even if it's over 50 knots we'll still land."
It was 46 when he touched down.
I was too diplomatic with this idiot. I was too nice and gentle. I should have raised a major Hissy-Fit. The wind was above 50 till we were on a 5 mile final.


At AA there is no CRM. The books are all written "The CA will"
At AA Only the CA gets the paperwork.

Never at AA has any CA ever asked me "7576FO did you have time to review the paperwork before we push back?"
I try to review the paperwork but there is not always time. I have found many mistakes. I wonder what one's i've missed.
ALL FO's Globally need to stand up. "Stop! I am not ready. You are rushing! This is an unsafe operation!" That is easy to write, but generally we try to "get along" too much in the cockpit.
I was a CA at a regional for 9 years before American. Yet I still find myself trying to get along, to make the best out of bad situations. Daily I find myself repeating things 3 times. "You are almost at 1,000' and You Do Not have flaps at 30! I am too diplomatic.
I am trying to be honest here and helpful in that we all have room for improvement. I sure do.

Last time I JS'd on SWA both pilots had a copy of the dispatch release for their review.

If you're convincing me never to fly at AA, you've done a good job.

Admittedly, this WAS an accident that need not have happened. Any idiot who attmpts to land at an airport with a severe thunderstorm IN PROGRESS (within the airport boundary to boot) and windshear warnings occuring produced by convectivity (x wind of 30-45 knots).......well, what can you say ?

It should be noted that this is not a slight on AA or it's pilots, but it proves that poor judgement can kill just as fast as complacency or inexperience.

eaglefly 05-17-2009 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aa73 (Post 612172)
I feel compelled to chime in on this post because 7576 brings up some very good points, along with some minor inacurracies.

Yes, AA is somewhat behind the rest of the industry in terms of modern CRM. We have a very Captain-oriented cockpit culture. CAs do all the PAs. CAs do all the engine starts. CAs turn on/off exterior lights and sterilize/desterilize the cabin through 10,000 - even if they are PF. CAs pull paperwork, flight plans, etc. Little stuff like that that should be more redistributed bewteen PF/PNF. But that's ancestral worship for ya. I've learned to do my own checks and balances. I always review the flight plan/performance in Sabre before heading out to the a/c. I always go over notams/wx, etc. I offer to do PAs if the CA asks.

Our Human Factors class is an offshoot of CRM, and I think it works well. We cover the same exact stuff I used to hear when I had CRM training at ACA. Just a different name.

But in the end, AA's cockpit culture is not too removed from the rest of the industry. You are as safe flying on AA as any major/legacy airline out there. In fact our pilots have had their hands full recently in dealing with a number of engine failures and other incidents in which they've performed flawlessly - and obviously a couple here and there where they could have done better (just like any other airline pilot group.)

AA1420 happened because, as 7576 points out, you had a chief pilot mission hacker paired with a new hire just off IOE. Fatigue played a big role as well. It was not the first of its kind, nor will it be the last. Let's all make sure we learn from it.

In the end, AA needs to change its CA ancestral worship philosophy and start incorporating the whole "FO is a CA in training" concept. We had that at ACA and it really accomplished a lot from a CRM and safety point of view.

Fly safe all,
73

I'm SHOCKED that AA is so far "behind the times". How can CRM be emphasized so strongly at Eagle and be so absent at AA ?

7576FO 05-17-2009 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eaglefly (Post 612262)
I'm SHOCKED that AA is so far "behind the times". How can CRM be emphasized so strongly at Eagle and be so absent at AA ?

If you get time please send me a PM on Eagles CRM. I am/will continue to push to get CRM at AA. I've talked to numerous UAL pilots about CLR.
I do know the industry standard "This is an unsafe operation, GO Around!"
But there are people that do not know this. There are CA's and FO's that just try to salvage the worst situations, or even a bad approach since it's always worked out in the past.
Thank you for anything you can send me. It'd be awesome to be able to tell my Supervisors "Hey, Eagle is way better than us on CRM"
Sincerely,
7576

Anyone else pile on this thread. How do you use CRM to unlock the other pilot?
Humor is the best, and I (we) do say things like "Oh, Yeah this is gonna look good on FOQUA!"

This is what this site is about. Maybe even this deserves it's own thread!
7576

7576FO 05-17-2009 07:21 AM

Additionally, I am not bashing my own airline. There is tons of room for improvement though. Perhaps at other airlines also.

EagleDriver 05-17-2009 07:49 AM

I feel compelled to speak about this just like aa73.

7576FO,

I don't know how you have developed some of your attitudes but IMHO you should conduct an assessment of whether you fulfill all of your duties and responsibilities in an AA cockpit. Our duties are spelled out in our AA manuals and I have never found any problem with AA CA's preventing an FO from exercising his duties. In fact, I find the opposite. It's so easy for an AA FO to sign in, preflight and go that I constantly have to force myself to review each preflight item, checklist item, switch position, Captain decision..... How many times has a Captain briefed you "Let's back each other up"? I hear it all the time.

I try to look at everything the Captain does and offer backup. If I find a mistake, I point it out and usually the CA thanks me. If I disagree with a Captain's decision I point it out. Sometimes they then change their decision, sometimes they don't, it's still their aircraft. If the decision affects safety or my ticket, I stick to my guns to the point of confrontation (very rare). If I had "seen" 50 knots taxi speed from my AA cockpit (we're not SW) on a parallel taxiway at MIA I would have advised the CA to slow down and if I felt strongly about it I would have applied brakes on my side of the cockpit. If that developed into a confrontation that caused a return to the gate, I'd have been more than happy to have filed the paperwork with the company and the FAA that the CA was jeopardizing safety and scaring his FO. Do you think the FAA would side with the CA that 50 knot taxi speeds are OK? Did you confront the CA about his speed or even file an ASAP report about the incident you saw?

I don't share your experience with CA's I fly with at AA. Most accept input from their FO's readily and opt for the most conservative course of action. I agree, this isn't emphasized in our version of a CRM course but it is the experience I've had on the line. You seem to realize you need to be more assertive in the cockpit. I agree. Sometimes confrontation is healthy.

I do agree our CRM course is a waste of time. It's really nothing more than another management attempt at propaganda to try to influence pilot behavior towards their hidden agenda. They spend as much time on customer service items as cockpit management items in our "Human Factors" training. What a joke.

aa73 05-17-2009 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eaglefly (Post 612261)
If you're convincing me never to fly at AA, you've done a good job.

Admittedly, this WAS an accident that need not have happened. Any idiot who attmpts to land at an airport with a severe thunderstorm IN PROGRESS (within the airport boundary to boot) and windshear warnings occuring produced by convectivity (x wind of 30-45 knots).......well, what can you say ?

It should be noted that this is not a slight on AA or it's pilots, but it proves that poor judgement can kill just as fast as complacency or inexperience.

And that proves exactly why you are at the same risk flying on ANY airline, not just AA. ALL airlines have had accidents just like LIT at some point or another. No matter how good the CRM program, training, cockpit culture, if you have a mission hacker who stretches his luck, it's gonna happen. And last I checked, ALL airlines have the percentage minority who are just like that AA CA.

7576 and Eagle driver... Great post and thread. These types of debate go a long way towards safety. P.s. I am flying through MIA all this month and next, will keep an eye out for ya.

aa73 05-17-2009 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eaglefly (Post 612262)
I'm SHOCKED that AA is so far "behind the times". How can CRM be emphasized so strongly at Eagle and be so absent at AA ?

Eaglefly. Understand that CRM exists at AA just like other airlines. It is just named differently. We just need to redistribute some minor stuff in the cockpit between PF/PNF. But everything else is very much comparable with most US airlines. Also understand that 7576 was venting and overdramatizing a little. He brings up a lot of the stuff that bugs me as well.

7576FO 05-17-2009 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aa73 (Post 612305)
Eaglefly. Understand that CRM exists at AA just like other airlines. It is just named differently. We just need to redistribute some minor stuff in the cockpit between PF/PNF. But everything else is very much comparable with most US airlines. Also understand that 7576 was venting and overdramatizing a little. He brings up a lot of the stuff that bugs me as well.

Yes I was venting, and yes overdramatizing a little.
7576

bubi352 05-17-2009 10:25 AM

I have to say that even at the airline I worked with in the past the CRM training was poor. I think it goes far beyond just AA.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 PM.
1  2  3  4 
Page 3 of 4
Go to


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons

Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands