SWA requirement for 737 type rating.
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 737/FO
Posts: 423
Originally Posted by rickair7777
True, but what if other airlines required you to buy a type prior to transitioning to a new aircraft...some airlines have LOTS of different aircraft on property. You'd be blowing $8-10K every few years as your career progressed...
It's just not somewhere we really want to go...
It's just not somewhere we really want to go...
The fact that SWA is the only major US carrier to require the type for new hire shows it's not something most airlines feel they can practically do, or want to. And I doubt any airline would be able to do it for transitions (none do that I know of). No pilot would transition from one left seat to another. SWA is in somewhat of a unique position being a one aircraft type company.
SWA's ability to get pilots to apply with the type is beginning to weaken as seen by their willingness to interview pilots without the type, and hire a few (inside word is about 20%) who then must go get it. Maybe this happened years ago, but not in recent memory. We have two pilots in our base that have 1800 and 1350 part 121 PIC respectively, both less than 4000 TT. They both claim no contacts (referrals) at SWA. Both applied without the type initially. Both then got the type and were called for interviews within two weeks of reporting to SWA they had completed the rating (Higher Power). Neither are check airman, neither have jet time (all turboprop pic). Both are still waiting for the DB.
There is a trend here that I like. It appears SWA is beginning to have troubles getting pilots they want to have that are willing to gain the type (by whatever means) before they apply.
#12
SWA type
There's no doubt that the type requirement at SWA is a controversial subject. We could debate it forever. Everyone talks about the ins and outs, philosophy, if/when to get it, is it considered PFT, what if you buy it and don't get hired etc. etc. blah blah blah.
I look at it like this: It's what SWA wants and it probably won't change any time soon. If you don't want to pay for it, don't. I did. It cost $7,300 at Higher Power 7 years ago. My first profit sharing deposit was $7,000 and my 401(k) match has been $7,000+ almost every year since I got hired. It's a no brainer as far as I'm concerned. It was well worth the risk. You can't sit on the fence your whole life.
Take care
S.B.
I look at it like this: It's what SWA wants and it probably won't change any time soon. If you don't want to pay for it, don't. I did. It cost $7,300 at Higher Power 7 years ago. My first profit sharing deposit was $7,000 and my 401(k) match has been $7,000+ almost every year since I got hired. It's a no brainer as far as I'm concerned. It was well worth the risk. You can't sit on the fence your whole life.
Take care
S.B.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: 737/FO
Posts: 423
Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
There's no doubt that the type requirement at SWA is a controversial subject. We could debate it forever. Everyone talks about the ins and outs, philosophy, if/when to get it, is it considered PFT, what if you buy it and don't get hired etc. etc. blah blah blah.
I look at it like this: It's what SWA wants and it probably won't change any time soon. If you don't want to pay for it, don't. I did. It cost $7,300 at Higher Power 7 years ago. My first profit sharing deposit was $7,000 and my 401(k) match has been $7,000+ almost every year since I got hired. It's a no brainer as far as I'm concerned. It was well worth the risk. You can't sit on the fence your whole life.
Take care
S.B.
I look at it like this: It's what SWA wants and it probably won't change any time soon. If you don't want to pay for it, don't. I did. It cost $7,300 at Higher Power 7 years ago. My first profit sharing deposit was $7,000 and my 401(k) match has been $7,000+ almost every year since I got hired. It's a no brainer as far as I'm concerned. It was well worth the risk. You can't sit on the fence your whole life.
Take care
S.B.
Last edited by WEACLRS; 06-05-2006 at 12:42 PM.
#14
Originally Posted by Sr. Barco
SWA requires the type because it lowers their insurance bill. Maybe there's other reasons but this is what I've been told by people in the know.
SWA does hire a fair amount of pilots without the type who then get the type and start class.
Anyone who is serious about flying for SWA should attend their company sponsored open house on Saturday June 10 in DAL. It is at the training center and begins at 8:00am.
Take care
S.B.
SWA does hire a fair amount of pilots without the type who then get the type and start class.
Anyone who is serious about flying for SWA should attend their company sponsored open house on Saturday June 10 in DAL. It is at the training center and begins at 8:00am.
Take care
S.B.
* Southwest Airlines Pilot Open House - Hear from the Pilot Hiring Team, ask questions, and win great prizes! You do not have to meet application minimums to attend. Open house is on June 10, 2006 from 1:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. at Southwest Airlines Headquarters, 2702 Love Field Drive, Dallas, TX 75235.
http://www.southwest.com/careers/pilot_open_house.html
#19
Hotels in DAL
Our crews stay at the Renaissance. The hotel shuttle runs every half hour to the training center. I'm not sure the cost but if SWA puts us up there it's probably a good deal. Very nice hotel. Good bar, great breakfast, 10 minutes to the training center etc.
S.B.
S.B.
#20
My sore spot is that there are many folks out there who buy the type and then attend an interview with a 20-30% selection opportunity...I feel bad for those folks and refuse to be one of them. SWA should not create the environment where you have to blow $6k+ to have a reasonable shot at an interview. They can still require you to get the type after the job offer and prior to class date if that's what they need.[/QUOTE]
That may be a sore spot for you but obviously it doesn't bother SWA. Its their company and why shouldn't they be allowed to impose any employment requirement they feel fits their model. No one is forcing anybody to apply. It is one more way they have of controlling costs thereby making them more competitive. And as long as there is no shortage of applicants why should they change? When people stop lining up to go to work there they will do what all company's do to attract applicants, they will lower their qualifications.
That may be a sore spot for you but obviously it doesn't bother SWA. Its their company and why shouldn't they be allowed to impose any employment requirement they feel fits their model. No one is forcing anybody to apply. It is one more way they have of controlling costs thereby making them more competitive. And as long as there is no shortage of applicants why should they change? When people stop lining up to go to work there they will do what all company's do to attract applicants, they will lower their qualifications.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post