Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Judge tosses suit saying pilots got sham divo >

Judge tosses suit saying pilots got sham divo

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Judge tosses suit saying pilots got sham divo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2009, 06:50 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,235
Default

I like it.
757upspilot is offline  
Old 10-19-2009, 07:24 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

CAL's response:
CO’s lawsuit against nine pilots is still pending despite court's dismissal of some claims

U.S. District Judge Gray Miller dismissed some claims asserted by CO and the pilot pension plan against former CO pilots accused of getting sham divorces so they and their spouses or ex-spouses could have access to the pilots’ retirement benefits while the pilots continued flying. The lawsuit is still pending, and Continental intends to vigorously litigate the remaining claims.

The court acknowledged that the pilots at issue did not act in a manner consistent with the breakup of a marriage, but Miller said that the plain language of the statute at issue does not allow CO’s pension administrator to consider the employees’ motivation for getting divorced when deciding whether to “qualify” a domestic relations order issued by a family court and distribute pension benefits.

CO issued the following statement Monday in response to Judge Miller’s decision:

“While we are disappointed by this ruling based on a technical reading of the ERISA statute, we are heartened the court recognized that the facts show––and the pilots do not seem to contest––the pilots and their former spouses did not behave in a manner consistent with the breakup of a marriage.

“This ruling did not address the propriety of Continental’s termination of the pilots’ employment. Continental and the plan administrative committee still believe that the domestic relations orders were improper and to the detriment of plan beneficiaries as a whole. Continental is evaluating its appeal options.”
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 10-19-2009, 07:26 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
At least at couple Delta guys were fired for the same thing. I wonder if this will get them their jobs back. Sure are gonna be some quiet cockpits with people that fly with them...
Just because you don't go to prison doesn't mean you get your job back. ?
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 10-19-2009, 07:35 PM
  #14  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot View Post
Just because you don't go to prison doesn't mean you get your job back. ?

You've got a good point. I shall bow out of this topic and leave it to the pros.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 10-19-2009, 07:36 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot View Post
Just because you don't go to prison doesn't mean you get your job back. ?
What were the reasons given for firing them?
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 10-19-2009, 07:45 PM
  #16  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton View Post
What were the reasons given for firing them?

Isn't there something in the ATP standards about "moral standards" or something to that effect?
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 02:48 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob View Post
Isn't there something in the ATP standards about "moral standards" or something to that effect?
Ha! Then where would chief pilots come from?
Inconceivable is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 04:12 AM
  #18  
HOSED BY PBS AGAIN
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Sorry, but once again a judge determines that crime does pay. What these shysters did was wrong. That so many see screwing fellow employees is quite okay because "management does it" is pathetic in my book. These were a greedy bunch of pilots who wanted to "get mine first", and THOUGHT they found a way to do it without raising any suspicion. Unfortunately, 7 or 8 pilots who are friends all getting a divorce and remarried at the same time seems a bit "fishy" to me, especially when they all grab money and do the EXACT SAME THING. If so many here think this is okay, then your moral compasses are way off. What these guys did was wrong, and for so many to condone it at the expense of fellow employees is sad in my book. Sorry, these guys are just as bad as scabs in my book. Their sorry butts need to be in jail. Personally I'd like to see the IRS go after them with a vengeance.
ewrbasedpilot is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 04:34 AM
  #19  
On Reserve
 
Fugawe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 11
Default

Originally Posted by ewrbasedpilot View Post
Sorry, but once again a judge determines that crime does pay. What these shysters did was wrong. That so many see screwing fellow employees is quite okay because "management does it" is pathetic in my book. These were a greedy bunch of pilots who wanted to "get mine first", and THOUGHT they found a way to do it without raising any suspicion. Unfortunately, 7 or 8 pilots who are friends all getting a divorce and remarried at the same time seems a bit "fishy" to me, especially when they all grab money and do the EXACT SAME THING. If so many here think this is okay, then your moral compasses are way off. What these guys did was wrong, and for so many to condone it at the expense of fellow employees is sad in my book. Sorry, these guys are just as bad as scabs in my book. Their sorry butts need to be in jail. Personally I'd like to see the IRS go after them with a vengeance.



What's your opinion on airline mgmt taking multi-million dollar bonuses after pilots take 23-50% paycuts (along with all other employees taking cuts)? Moral and ethical? It's (the bonuses) 'legal' just as these divorces were.....fishy or not.

The 'get mine first' crowd is mgmt. You may not like what these pilots did, but what do you suggest? Should they hang around until the airline goes totally under and there's no $$ for anyone? Do you really think the retirement $$ they earned and took via divorce really affects anything with the airline ops?

They used a legal loophole to extract $$ from the airline they'd never get otherwise (unless you really think this airline will be around to pay their retirements). You might disagree with them on moral and ethical grounds -- but you should be all over mgmt too, or you're a hypocrite.

Personally I don't like it either, but I'll vilify mgmt before I crucify an employee taking desperate measures to secure retirement funds that will be stolen by mgmt in the end anyway.

Do you think these pilots would have done this had they not been shoved into a corner? Who shoved them? Who's the real villiain?

OK, 2 rights don't make a wrong..........but then, this ain't Camelot.
Fugawe is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 05:14 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton View Post
What were the reasons given for firing them?
Fraud against the company. They fired a pilot for stealing earplugs from the crew room. He took the whole box. Stealing lots of money works too.
Ottopilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DryMotorBoatin
Regional
22
07-06-2009 06:21 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
18
06-12-2009 04:47 AM
ERJ135
GoJet
121
06-05-2009 09:58 AM
Redwood
Major
73
09-06-2008 06:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices