Judge tosses suit saying pilots got sham divo
The Associated Press: Judge tosses suit saying pilots got sham divorces
Judge tosses suit saying pilots got sham divorces By HARRY R. WEBER (AP) – 32 minutes ago ATLANTA — A federal judge Monday tossed out a Continental Airlines Inc. lawsuit accusing nine pilots of getting sham divorces so their ex-spouses could collect the pilots' retirement benefits while they kept flying. U.S. District Judge Gray Miller said he can't condone the pilots' alleged actions. But he ruled that the law doesn't allow Continental's pension administrator to consider the employees' motivation for getting divorced in deciding whether to distribute benefits. Miller granted the pilots' motion to dismiss. There was no immediate response from a spokeswoman for Houston-based Continental, which said it paid out between $10 million and $11 million in suspicious pension distributions. Some individual payments were as much as $900,000, according to court papers. The airline said some of the pilots concealed the divorces from children and friends, then remarried their spouses after getting the money. The pilots in question all obtained divorces from various states with domestic relations orders that assigned 100 percent, and in one case 90 percent, of their retirement benefits under the plan to their spouses. The retirement plan qualified the domestic relations orders and, because the pilots were of retirement age when the alternate payees requested a lump-sum payout, the plan paid the benefits. Miller said "the facts show — and the pilots do not seem to contest — that the pilots and their former spouses did not behave in a manner consistent with the breakup of a marriage." He said many of the pilots continued to cohabitate, remarried soon after obtaining the lump-sum payout and all essentially conducted themselves as if the divorce had never happened. But the judge said none of that was relevant to the issue at hand. He said "the administrator may not refuse to qualify a domestic relations order based on criteria not present in the statute." The judge added that "the court finds that the motivation or good faith of the divorce and resulting domestic relations order is not an enumerated requirement." As of the time the suit was filed, eight of the pilots had been fired or quit. One was rehired after he promised to pay back the retirement money, the airline said — although he too was named as a defendant after failing to repay. The spouses were also named as defendants. The airline and the committee that runs its pilots' retirement plan filed the lawsuit in federal court in Houston. Continental asked the court to order the pilots to return the money and to declare that the company was not violating anti-discrimination laws in firing the pilots. Continental charged that the pilots — seven men and two women — tried to take advantage of a loophole in a major federal pension law that in cases of divorce allows payment of benefits before the worker retires. Several airlines have terminated pension plans and turned them over to the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., and the Continental pilots might have feared the same thing could happen at their carrier. Continental said it began receiving "a significant number" of requests for lump-sum pension payouts to ex-spouses of working pilots beginning in late 2005, and by mid-2007 the airline learned that the couples usually remarried after getting the money. Other pilots besides the nine named in the lawsuit apparently tried the same ploy, according to the lawsuit. In some cases, the company stopped payments before they were made. Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. |
Well I'll be a monkey's uncle.
|
Bravo and kudos to the Judge for a proper decision!!! For once a law enacted (QDRO OF 1984) actaully worked in favor of the participant to protect him/herself in the event of an untimely termination of a retirement benefit.
|
I'm willing to bet CAL will use this to explain why they can't support the retirement fund any longer. "Well if your pilot friends didn't take advantage of poor little us we would have done it, but oh well."
|
For all the scheduling and contractual loopholes that the company always seems to find, I'm happy to see CAL management finally see how it feels.
Unethical... yup, I'm not gonna debate that. Deserving to an absolutely ruthless and unethical bunch of penny pinching lawyers who run CAL... YOU BET!:) |
I imagine there is going to be some discussions after the kids are put to bed.:eek:
|
At least at couple Delta guys were fired for the same thing. I wonder if this will get them their jobs back. Sure are gonna be some quiet cockpits with people that fly with them...
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 697017)
At least at couple Delta guys were fired for the same thing. I wonder if this will get them their jobs back. Sure are gonna be some quiet cockpits with people that fly with them...
|
This makes me proud, after all the crap CAL’s forced down their pilots throats, this simple win warms my heart. Finally someone was able to fight back and win using Mgmnt’s own game plan of finding loopholes and exploiting them.
|
Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
(Post 697024)
Are you saying that you wouldn't talk to them if they got their job back? Pathetic if that's the case.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:37 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands