Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Dallas newspaper on AA crash; fatigue, union >

Dallas newspaper on AA crash; fatigue, union

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Dallas newspaper on AA crash; fatigue, union

Old 12-28-2009, 07:18 PM
  #21  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by gettinbumped View Post
Because we don't know anything yet. Could it have been a hydraulic or brake failure? Let's just wait and see what comes out of the investigation before we say ANYTHING.
I know I wasn't meaning to jump in that direction. My point was we don't know anything yet fatigue is already being used by everyone from their union to the media. I'm tired of hearing about it so early in the game it's not a catchall
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 12-28-2009, 07:57 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
The safety officer in me would be required to ask WHY was there a bad landing made. It isn't good enough to just admit circumstances conspired to ruin the landing. WHAT caused those circumstances. As you noted earlier though - fatigue getting thrown about in every case is really watering down a serious issue IMO.

USMCFLYR
Depends on how the issue is approached. It's not till just recently that it's ACTUALLY been given attention when it was so easily disregarded before. And for many reasons that have been pointed out, political/economic.

Originally Posted by jayray View Post
Maybe it's because fatigue really is an issue in most incidents/accidents.
Good point, see above.

Originally Posted by HalinTexas View Post
Fatigue is an issue, but not a cause. A 12 hour duty day, ending at 2130 EST, isn't that long of a day.
But not short either Also, depends on how that day was constructed. YES, I know they're a mainline legacy crew, etc. But I've had PLENTY of 12 hour days, standard 4 am wake up going to the hub. Sit 4-5 hours of mind numbing sit, trying to get breakfast, then try to take a nap in a noisy crewroom, Then do a turn, back to a 3-4 hour sit in the hub, trying to get a late lunch/dinner, without time for a nap in a noisy crewroom. THEN to the overnight. Like I said, not a "long" day, not a short/easy one either. Try it consecutive days, makes it even worse.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 12-28-2009, 08:16 PM
  #23  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
But not short either Also, depends on how that day was constructed. YES, I know they're a mainline legacy crew, etc. But I've had PLENTY of 12 hour days, standard 4 am wake up going to the hub. Sit 4-5 hours of mind numbing sit, trying to get breakfast, then try to take a nap in a noisy crewroom, Then do a turn, back to a 3-4 hour sit in the hub, trying to get a late lunch/dinner, without time for a nap in a noisy crewroom. THEN to the overnight. Like I said, not a "long" day, not a short/easy one either. Try it consecutive days, makes it even worse.

If I keep going during the day, 12-14 hour is no huge deal as long as I got a decent night sleep the night before.

If there are 3+ hr sits involved... 12 might as well be 15.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 12-28-2009, 08:25 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
If I keep going during the day, 12-14 hour is no huge deal as long as I got a decent night sleep the night before.

If there are 3+ hr sits involved... 12 might as well be 15.

Agree, I know what you mean.

At my former employer, it was common on days 2 and 3 being 10-12 hours doing six leg days, 1:00-1:10 block times every leg, minimal plane swap/bag drag/sit time. At the end of the day, tired, but not dragging a$$ completely dreading the next day tired.

As I outlined previously, 3-4 legs with the sits/plane swaps/bag drag, just not the case. As far as the "decent night's sleep" goes. You know how it is when you have consecutive 9-10 hour "rest" periods.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 04:38 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,886
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
The safety officer in me would be required to ask WHY was there a bad landing made. It isn't good enough to just admit circumstances conspired to ruin the landing. WHAT caused those circumstances. As you noted earlier though - fatigue getting thrown about in every case is really watering down a serious issue IMO.

USMCFLYR
Come on… the “Fatigue” card is really getting old when crews hide behind the skirts of their unions. Yet some of these same guys may get into their cars after a 14 hour duty day and may drive another 2 hours to get home. Where does one draw the line?

Last edited by captjns; 12-29-2009 at 05:38 AM.
captjns is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 12:40 PM
  #26  
Portuguese Troubleshooter
 
ImEbee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Burrito Bomber
Posts: 370
Default

Originally Posted by Jack Bauer View Post

Mayer added that American doesn't pay pilots whose trips get interrupted and who can't complete the flying they signed up for. The pilots of Flight 331 were on their first day of a multi-day sequence of trips that, had they diverted the plane to another city, would probably have jeopardized their ability to fly out the rest of the sequence. Not completing trips can cost pilots thousands of dollars in lost income, Mayer said.

"Our pilots shouldn't have to sacrifice their principles to get paid," he said.

Did a union spokesman really get quoted saying this and does this strike anyone else as completely inappropriate? I don't think there is much sypmathy for anyone who potentially endagers others because of paycheck ramifications. Pilots should sacrifice their principals period!
ImEbee is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 12:46 PM
  #27  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

First day of a trip the fatigue card is a little hard to play. I'm on day 5 of 6 with nothing but early shows and I stay good to go by going to sleep when I'm suppose to.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 12:52 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
First day of a trip the fatigue card is a little hard to play.
Depends on the circumstance. If the day 1 show was 5am, and with delays, little if any meal breaks, and the day being extended to 14-16 hours, would fatigue NOT play a role.

And we can fly off on an ubber tangent here. If day 1 the show was 12-1pm, but said pilot had to get up at 5,6,7 am whether it was to commute, or be with his newborn baby, or whatever you think of, and a 10-11 day got stretched again to the 14-16 hour mark, would you say that fatigue doesn't play a role?
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 01:15 PM
  #29  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
And we can fly off on an ubber tangent here. If day 1 the show was 12-1pm, but said pilot had to get up at 5,6,7 am whether it was to commute, or be with his newborn baby, or whatever you think of, and a 10-11 day got stretched again to the 14-16 hour mark, would you say that fatigue doesn't play a role?
Sure fatigue would be an issue but there's different types of fatigue. There's the kind that's your own fault and the kind that's related to bad scheduling and work rules. What you listed has nothing to do with the later. Fatigue due to someone's own personal choices is still pilot error. IE Colgan in Buffalo. Capt. sleeping in the crew room prior with little sleep and the FO taking a redeye from Seattle to EWR. Were they fatigued? Yes. Was it because of schedules, weather, work rules, or Fed regulations? No.

I guess any accident could be associated with fatigue from a certain point of view if you squint hard enough. Why were they fatigued is the issue. At some point you have to prioritize and take the responsibility to make sure you show up ready to do your job. The early flights, babies in the night, etc. are part of your personal life and need to be dealt with so they don't put you and your pax in danger.

The focus of the fatigue issues need to be about things the company and FAA have control over. Not the things they don't(our personal time). Keep yelling fatigue where it turns up being because of bad decisions prior to even starting the trip and there's no telling what direction congress could take to curb that. It's completely counter productive to the main issues being targeted (work rules, duty days, sit times, rest requirements etc).
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 12-29-2009, 01:54 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Wow, no surprise there, saw that one coming a mile away, hence this part;

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
And we can fly off on an ubber tangent here.
Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
Sure fatigue would be an issue but there's different types of fatigue. There's the kind that's your own fault and the kind that's related to bad scheduling and work rules. What you listed has nothing to do with the later. Fatigue due to someone's own personal choices is still pilot error. IE Colgan in Buffalo. Capt. sleeping in the crew room prior with little sleep and the FO taking a redeye from Seattle to EWR. Were they fatigued? Yes. Was it because of schedules, weather, work rules, or Fed regulations? No.

I guess any accident could be associated with fatigue from a certain point of view if you squint hard enough. Why were they fatigued is the issue. At some point you have to prioritize and take the responsibility to make sure you show up ready to do your job. The early flights, babies in the night, etc. are part of your personal life and need to be dealt with so they don't put you and your pax in danger.

The focus of the fatigue issues need to be about things the company and FAA have control over. Not the things they don't(our personal time). Keep yelling fatigue where it turns up being because of bad decisions prior to even starting the trip and there's no telling what direction congress could take to curb that. It's completely counter productive to the main issues being targeted (work rules, duty days, sit times, rest requirements etc).
However, my point was based on when you said this;

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck View Post
First day of a trip the fatigue card is a little hard to play.
I simply responded with this;

Originally Posted by dojetdriver View Post
Depends on the circumstance. If the day 1 show was 5am, and with delays, little if any meal breaks, and the day being extended to 14-16 hours, would fatigue NOT play a role?
If you've never seen or experienced what I'm talking about, sorry, don't know what to tell you.

And I'd agree with the personal responsibility issue. My point on that was simply to list other examples. But those factors will always be there, they'll NEVER go away.
dojetdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jetjok
Cargo
16
11-24-2013 04:55 AM
ToiletDuck
Safety
5
08-08-2012 09:04 PM
Convairator
Regional
57
12-25-2009 09:15 PM
vagabond
Union Talk
0
07-13-2009 05:45 PM
jungle
Money Talk
2
08-25-2008 10:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices