![]() |
Slowplay is correct.
Will let one of the authors of the USERRA statute say in his own words. Bottom line: USERRA does not apply to the union vote. Depends on what the unions Constitution and Bylaws (or equivalent) allow. Each union is different. Number 55, October 2002: VOTING IN UNION ELECTIONS WHILE MOBILIZED By CAPT Samuel F. Wright, JAGC, USNR* Q: I left my civilian job when I was recalled to active duty involuntarily. My civilian employer has asked my union to make financial accommodations in our salaries and benefits. The employer claims that such concessions are necessary to ensure the continued viability of the company, but that is a matter of some dispute. The union has decided to put the concessions question to a vote of the members. I contacted my union to inquire about obtaining a ballot for this upcoming referendum. The union told me that it will not permit recalled Reservists to vote in this referendum. I think that this is unfair. I definitely intend to return to that employer, just as soon as I am released from active duty. My civilian career will be affected by the outcome of the referendum, just as much as the careers of my co-workers who were not recalled to active duty. Can you help me? A: We of ROA certainly agree that you and the other recalled Reservists should be permitted to vote in the upcoming referendum and also in any union officer elections that are held during your active-duty period. ROA Executive Director Jayson L. Spiegel has written to your national union president, asking for this accommodation. We will keep you posted. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and then this followup: Number 179, June 2005-web only: Voting in NLRB Elections while Mobilized By CAPT Samuel F. Wright, JAGC, USNR* In Law Review 55, I addressed the question of voting in intra-union elections while mobilized. The particular election at issue there was a referendum as to whether the union members would approve “give backs” to the employer-these are concessions of contractual rights under a collective bargaining agreement that is already in effect and has not expired. The same considerations would apply to an internal union election of union officers. It would be nice if the union would permit mobilized members to vote in such elections, but no law requires the union to do this. Jayson Spiegel, then the executive director of ROA, sent a letter to the union president, requesting that the union reconsider its position and permit mobilized members to vote. The union president sent Mr. Spiegel a polite response, saying that the union supports the military but that the union constitution does not permit mobilized members to vote in union elections. The union president suggested that if the member wanted to amend the union constitution, the member could start that process by getting his own local to endorse the proposed amendment. Yeah, right! This servicemember really has time for that while on active duty in Afghanistan. Recently, I have learned of a similar but not identical situation. This new situation involves a union representation election. The National Labor Relations Act, which was originally enacted in 1935, provides for such elections when employees of a particular employer demonstrate a “showing of interest” in union representation. Upon such a showing, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) conducts an election among the affected employees. If a majority of the employees votes for representation by that union, the NLRB certifies the union as the exclusive bargaining representative for all the non-supervisory employees, including those who may have voted against union representation. The situation involves a very small employer in western Pennsylvania. It has 14 non-supervisory employees, including two who have been mobilized and are in Iraq. The employer informed the NLRB representative of the two mobilized employees and suggested that some arrangement should be made to enable them to vote, but the NLRB representative explained that NLRB rules do not provide for absentee ballots in union representation elections. The election was held in March 2005. Six employees voted for union representation, and five voted against. One ballot was challenged, and its validity has not yet been determined. The two mobilized employees had no opportunity to vote. If they had voted, their ballots certainly could have affected the outcome. I think that the NLRB should provide an opportunity for absentee voting in elections such as this. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Military title used for purposes of identification only. The views expressed herein are the personal views of the authors and should not be attributed to the Department of the Navy, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. government. |
You will be back from leave well before there is a TA to vote on at CAL. Your military commitment is for less than 3 years is it not?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:26 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands