Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   STAFFING at DELTA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/48804-staffing-delta.html)

TenYearsGone 03-07-2010 03:23 PM

STAFFING at DELTA
 
Does anyone know (ACL, Super, Johnso??) the amount of crews, going forward, that DELTA plans per Narrowbody and Widebody aircraft?

If the plan is to have 730 aircraft at mainline are we FAT on pilots?


Thanks,

TYG

acl65pilot 03-07-2010 03:45 PM

We have 740 a/c

6-7 crew to 16 depending on the jet.

It is the utilization that matters.

johnso29 03-07-2010 04:11 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 775036)
We have 740 a/c

6-7 crew to 16 depending on the jet.

It is the utilization that matters.


Bingo! The 757 could be used waaaay more, and that alone would require more bodies.

TenYearsGone 03-07-2010 06:56 PM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 775047)
Bingo! The 757 could be used waaaay more, and that alone would require more bodies.

Thanks guys.

TYG

forgot to bid 03-07-2010 07:16 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 775036)
We have 740 a/c

6-7 crew to 16 depending on the jet.

It is the utilization that matters.

So lets just say 10 crews to a jet, we have what 222 70-76 seat regional jets so multiply 222 x 10 = 2220 crews x 2 = 4,440 pilots we could have here. Boy, moving up 30-40% in seniority would be nice.


:D

PILEOAV8R 03-07-2010 07:29 PM

The 70 to 76 seat jets are more along the lines of 5 - 6 crews per airplane... so cut your number in half...

flight0813 03-07-2010 08:57 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 775141)
So lets just say 10 crews to a jet, we have what 222 70-76 seat regional jets so multiply 222 x 10 = 2220 crews x 2 = 4,440 pilots we could have here. Boy, moving up 30-40% in seniority would be nice.


:D

The thread is about Delta staffing, Why are you using regional numbers in your calculation for seniority? No hating here, just curious.

goaround2000 03-07-2010 09:01 PM


Originally Posted by flight0813 (Post 775190)
The thread is about Delta staffing, Why are you using regional numbers in your calculation for seniority? No hating here, just curious.

You clearly missed his point. Those aircraft should be flown by mainline, not the regional partners, which in turn means more jobs for everyone at mainline.

80ktsClamp 03-07-2010 09:18 PM


Originally Posted by flight0813 (Post 775190)
The thread is about Delta staffing, Why are you using regional numbers in your calculation for seniority? No hating here, just curious.


He used mainline staffing (and more or less overstaffed) in his numbers... not the typical regional staffing of 4-6 crews per airplane.

Regardless... all of these jumbo RJ's need to be at mainline, evenmoreso all flying under a carrier's colors.

dojetdriver 03-07-2010 09:43 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 775196)
He used mainline staffing (and more or less overstaffed) in his numbers... not the typical regional staffing of 4-6 crews per airplane.

Regardless... all of these jumbo RJ's need to be at mainline, evenmoreso all flying under a carrier's colors.

Just curious, but under the DAL CBA/workrules/staffing model, etc. Assuming the sub 100 seat equipment was at mainline, what would be the breakdown in crews per airframe? I'm assuming more than the 4-6 regional model. OR, would it be more efficient than what the regionals do?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands