Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Airlines To Cancel Flights >

Airlines To Cancel Flights

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Airlines To Cancel Flights

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2010, 11:30 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cargo Man's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 193
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
Hi!

Why don't the airlines schedule their landings and takeoffs at each airport so there will be no landing/takeoff/gate access delays? Obviously, there is no controlling the WX, but if the airlines schedule 1000 movements at O'Hare between 1700-1900, and it can only accomodate 500 mvmts, delays will occur.

If I were gov't I would not allow more landings/takeoffs per hour, at any airport, than can be accomodated by ATC, the runways, taxiways and the gate availability. That would solve a huge chunk of the delay problems.

cliff
NBO
That can work for cargo....if you have all day, or night.
Cargo Man is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 11:37 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: B-777 left
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff View Post
Hi!

Why don't the airlines schedule their landings and takeoffs at each airport so there will be no landing/takeoff/gate access delays? Obviously, there is no controlling the WX, but if the airlines schedule 1000 movements at O'Hare between 1700-1900, and it can only accomodate 500 mvmts, delays will occur.

If I were gov't I would not allow more landings/takeoffs per hour, at any airport, than can be accomodated by ATC, the runways, taxiways and the gate availability. That would solve a huge chunk of the delay problems.

cliff
NBO
Since you mentioned ord I thought I would mention. A number of years ago both ual and amr did cut back many flights during a couple of peak times so the entire operations would work better for everyone at ord. They did this while working with the faa to improve operations at ord. Just so you know that same faa had all those slots(I know probably not the rght word) filled in less than 30 days by all the other airlines. Yes every last one. As far as weather I think atc tries to control it way too much. Many times having airliners sitting waiting when they could be leaving, yes even when we are asking them to let us go you get the same response from local control yes we agree with you but the flow control people still have the ground stop in effect. Hapens at iad all the time
syd111 is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 04:55 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
indapit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 147
Default

I saw that passenger rights lady on CNN the other day. She was complaining about the airlines canceling so many flights due to weather. The anchor did not have much sympathy for her.
indapit is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:35 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 712
Default

Originally Posted by indapit View Post
I saw that passenger rights lady on CNN the other day. She was complaining about the airlines canceling so many flights due to weather. The anchor did not have much sympathy for her.
Love it! They sure showed us didnt they?
Herkulesdrvr is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:21 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
indapit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by Herkulesdrvr View Post
Love it! They sure showed us didnt they?
They did show us. I'm sure they will go after the airlines next because all the flights are full for a week as well as the hotels in the area. All I can say is have fun sleeping on the floor of airports......thats way better than sitting on a plane for 3 hours.
indapit is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:42 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Lets not forget how we got here. Flight after flight sitting for 6 or more hours on the tarmac and in a recent event overnight in Rochester with no food. Captains need to step up and be Captains and go back to the gate. I for one would not have stayed all night in a RJ stuck on the tarmac in Rochester.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:59 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: pilot
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by HIFLYR View Post
Lets not forget how we got here. Flight after flight sitting for 6 or more hours on the tarmac and in a recent event overnight in Rochester with no food. Captains need to step up and be Captains and go back to the gate. I for one would not have stayed all night in a RJ stuck on the tarmac in Rochester.
The problem is much bigger than crew. It is all related to deregulation. The Government used to strictly control routes to ensure the demand on infrastructure was not greater than capacity.

Also all this B.S. about modernizing ATC would help a little but would not solve the root cause, more operations than runway/gate space. The market pressure on airlines to cut cost while at the same time increase frequency to meet customer demand has caused the massive delay problems. To many small airplanes moving people around.

The article quoted is correct in the assertion the airlines could prevent cancelations by shifting operations to prevent high frequency operations, having more pilots and aircraft in reserve, however there is too much economic pressure to have the cheapest fair for these solutions to be viable.

I believe some price fixing by the government would be nice. A minimum CASM built into fairs would stabilize the industry. We would no longer be a greyhound with wings. It would also shrink the industry substantially. The idea that everyone should be able to afford airline travel is absurd. The traveling public are trying to have their cake and eat it too. If you want safe quality service without controllable delays it costs money. If you want affordable air travel you should remember to pack a pillow so that bench at the airport is more comfortable.
rdneckpilot is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 07:42 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,032
Default

Originally Posted by cal73 View Post
I'm all for showing congress what the "law of unintended consequences" is all about but what that suggests borders on malicious and deceitful. Besides sitting in my office for hours on end while not getting paid does not sound like something I'd be gung ho about anyway.
It sure does, the policy sounds specifically designed to circumvent the rules. It refers to it numerous times as upholding the "Customer Commitment". I guess that means the customers will need to be committed after they go crazy and riot when held at the gate for 2 hours.

Originally Posted by PropPiedmont View Post
Will the crew be babysitting without pay then?
Yes, unpaid babysitting.
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 07:48 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by HIFLYR View Post
Lets not forget how we got here. Flight after flight sitting for 6 or more hours on the tarmac and in a recent event overnight in Rochester with no food. Captains need to step up and be Captains and go back to the gate. I for one would not have stayed all night in a RJ stuck on the tarmac in Rochester.
I was at JFK when the Valentine's Day debacle happened in '07. A large part of the reason that people were stranded was the ramp areas were covered in ice and the jetways were unable to move. The ramps were so slick tugs were braking tow bars trying to push back airplanes to open up gates. The media blamed the airlines and there was some accountability but it wasn't a dereliction on the airline's part. Life happens. People forget that in our instant gratification life. This stupid rule just proves that the "law of unintended consequences" is alive and well.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 07:48 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MD11HOG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: MD11 F/O
Posts: 653
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot View Post
The passengers complained because they were delayed, now they won't get there until the next day if they are lucky. Funny. I hope they are happy.
No, they complained because they were locked up in a crowded, nasty( full toilets) tube without food or water for hours on end. The airlines had years and years to do something about it and they chose not to even address the issue.
MD11HOG is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mmaviator
Regional
30
04-15-2013 01:49 PM
freightdog
Regional
64
12-03-2009 02:17 PM
MikeB525
Major
26
09-27-2009 11:45 AM
bgmann
Major
8
09-07-2009 06:14 AM
vagabond
Major
15
10-12-2008 12:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices