![]() |
Originally Posted by Fishfreighter
(Post 892550)
Both Alaska and Horizon are on the block.
|
Moose,
Do you know if a bunch of guys submitted their paperwork today? I am not a financial guru, but apparently there are some tax implications on your lump sum if you retire in early 2011 vs. late this year. It's to the tune of $50k. So, gummers who want to go within the next few months are better off turning in their paperwork today... something to do with November interest rates. See TL's post on the WebBoards under "Retirement & Insurance." |
Originally Posted by Homa
(Post 894579)
Moose,
Do you know if a bunch of guys submitted their paperwork today? I am not a financial guru, but apparently there are some tax implications on your lump sum if you retire in early 2011 vs. late this year. It's to the tune of $50k. So, gummers who want to go within the next few months are better off turning in their paperwork today... something to do with November interest rates. See TL's post on the WebBoards under "Retirement & Insurance." |
Originally Posted by Moose
(Post 894611)
as they are all coming back.
|
Originally Posted by turbodriver
(Post 894616)
Is this a definite?
|
Have they even STARTED SEA Etops training? I think PDX is eating their lunch all by it's lonesome...
|
Prior planning prevents poor performance. Its a lesson the 2nd floor has never learned.
|
Originally Posted by Moose
(Post 894620)
No. I told her I heard all the furloughs were coming back by next summer and she said they have to. It was not an official yes, but her take on what she is seeing in Crew Planning. I'm just not sure how many they can bring back with all the SEA ETOPS training going on.
|
The company is going to have to resort to buying sim time from someone else (Flight Safety or Boeing) and possibly even using non-Alaska instructors. I'm sure they're going to want us to give them relief on back-side-of-the-clock sim sessions. I don't have a problem with using a third party's sims. As much as I want to see all the furloughed pilots back pronto, we absolutely cannot give on the back-side-of-the-clock training. As for using non-Alaska instructors, I don't like this either. Our cadre of instructors will put up a good fight on this issue I'm sure. If the company wants to sign a side-letter for, say, a 6-month relief on these issues to get people back, then it might be worth looking at.
|
Originally Posted by Homa
(Post 894712)
The company is going to have to resort to buying sim time from someone else (Flight Safety or Boeing) and possibly even using non-Alaska instructors. I'm sure they're going to want us to give them relief on back-side-of-the-clock sim sessions. I don't have a problem with using a third party's sims. As much as I want to see all the furloughed pilots back pronto, we absolutely cannot give on the back-side-of-the-clock training. As for using non-Alaska instructors, I don't like this either. Our cadre of instructors will put up a good fight on this issue I'm sure. If the company wants to sign a side-letter for, say, a 6-month relief on these issues to get people back, then it might be worth looking at.
|
Originally Posted by Justin Case
(Post 894738)
So that's what that super secret union meeting with the company was for last monday?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:14 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands