Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
ATN/SWA process agremeent ... >

ATN/SWA process agremeent ...

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

ATN/SWA process agremeent ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2011, 07:25 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 441
Default

Stretch the timeline out?! Are you effing nuts? I just spewed my Fruity Pebbles all over the screen. Thanks a lot. Do tell why we'd want to "drag the timeline out"?
That is a good question but if you can answer this question then you should be able to answer yours. That question is why is language that AirTran wanted in the Process Agreement in Dec is the same language that AirTran's lawyers are questioning. They aren't questioning language that SWAPA wanted, only language that AirTran wanted!
tanker is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 08:51 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by Bush Pilot View Post
I'll try to take them one at a time. Can we keep the hyperbole out of this? Or, is it going to quickly deteriorate to a thread on Flight Info?

Can you explain to me how getting to SWA is not a windfall? How many SWA pilots (captains included) have left SWA for Airtran? How about the reverse? How many AAI pilots had their application on file at SWA prior to 9/27/10? Why is that?

That we have leverage is no mystery and does not need to be supported by unsubstantiated anonymous rumor. We have leverage because we negotiated it in our CBA. We have leverage through the Sideletter that we just negotiated with our management. We have leverage because of the reasons I posted above. We have leverage because we have the better contract. We have leverage because we are the largest domestic carrier in the world. We have leverage because we have a great working relationship with our management. If you feel you've been left in a lurch through this process look no further than your own management and the CBA you have with them. If you want a better "transition agreement" then you need to go to YOUR management. SWA has no legal authority or right to negotiate WITH ATN MEC/ALPA and neither does SWAPA. It is forbidden by our CBA. What do you expect?

I would never tell you how to "feel" about this deal. Why was there a mass exodus of any Airtran pilot that applied and could get hired at SWA? Why were there no pilots leaving SWA to go to AAI? It's simple and you know it so let's start from there and don't ignore the facts. SWA is a better place to be. Pay, Bennies, Schedule, QOL, relationship with mgt, Career expectations, I could go on and on.

And the vast majority of swapa pilots feel you are getting a windfall just by getting to come here, without having to interview, go through probation, get stapled to the bottom of the list (like the rest of us did) and start all over again at 1st year pay (like your Airtran brothers and sisters did that had the requirements and were fortunate enough to get hired)

Says you and your crystal ball. Keep throwing your "I want it all" temper tantrum. The more you show Kelly and VanDeVen your dark side, the more you are making the case for swapa. These guys live in the vacuum where they think all pilots are like Southwest pilots. They have no concept what it's like to have a pilot group on property that would vote to strike the place by 97%. The reason is that they have been good to us and WE HAVE BEEN GOOD TO THEM. SWAPA pilots made many sacrifices over the years to get to that point. Why should we give any of our seniority up to an Airtran pilot?





Nice speech. Read it to the Arbiters in 6 months. I'm sure they'll be impressed.

We'll see you there.
RCD73 is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 09:04 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Default Rcd73

Nice speech. Read it to the Arbiters in 6 months. I'm sure they'll be impressed.

We'll see you there.
Speech is actually something that is spoken.

Also, you obviously missed the 1st line:

Can we keep the hyperbole out of this?
If you want to debate the merits of my post vis a vis WHACKMASTER's, then by all means-jump in.

Bush Pilot is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 09:32 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by Bush Pilot View Post
Speech is actually something that is spoken.

Also, you obviously missed the 1st line:

If you want to debate the merits of my post vis a vis WHACKMASTER's, then by all means-jump in.



I found no "merits" in your post. It was an emotional rant.

"Speech" ..... I'm sure you were muttering to yourself as you typed. So we'll stick with speech shall we ?
RCD73 is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 09:40 AM
  #25  
Don't want to participate
 
LuvJockey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: 737 Left Seat
Posts: 1,016
Default

Some guys just can't control themselves, I question whether or not they're really SWA pilots. Same stuff happened here on APC during the SWA/F9 drama, an amazing number of "new hire" posters popped up never to be heard from again after about a week.

There is nothing to gain by debating it here. If you are SWA guys, let it play out like it's supposed to.

Last edited by LuvJockey; 03-13-2011 at 09:51 AM.
LuvJockey is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 10:02 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by Bush Pilot View Post
I'll try to take them one at a time. Can we keep the hyperbole out of this? Or, is it going to quickly deteriorate to a thread on Flight Info?

Can you explain to me how getting to SWA is not a windfall? How many SWA pilots (captains included) have left SWA for Airtran? How about the reverse? How many AAI pilots had their application on file at SWA prior to 9/27/10? Why is that?

That we have leverage is no mystery and does not need to be supported by unsubstantiated anonymous rumor. We have leverage because we negotiated it in our CBA. We have leverage through the Sideletter that we just negotiated with our management. We have leverage because of the reasons I posted above. We have leverage because we have the better contract. We have leverage because we are the largest domestic carrier in the world. We have leverage because we have a great working relationship with our management. If you feel you've been left in a lurch through this process look no further than your own management and the CBA you have with them. If you want a better "transition agreement" then you need to go to YOUR management. SWA has no legal authority or right to negotiate WITH ATN MEC/ALPA and neither does SWAPA. It is forbidden by our CBA. What do you expect?

I would never tell you how to "feel" about this deal. Why was there a mass exodus of any Airtran pilot that applied and could get hired at SWA? Why were there no pilots leaving SWA to go to AAI? It's simple and you know it so let's start from there and don't ignore the facts. SWA is a better place to be. Pay, Bennies, Schedule, QOL, relationship with mgt, Career expectations, I could go on and on.

And the vast majority of swapa pilots feel you are getting a windfall just by getting to come here, without having to interview, go through probation, get stapled to the bottom of the list (like the rest of us did) and start all over again at 1st year pay (like your Airtran brothers and sisters did that had the requirements and were fortunate enough to get hired)

Says you and your crystal ball. Keep throwing your "I want it all" temper tantrum. The more you show Kelly and VanDeVen your dark side, the more you are making the case for swapa. These guys live in the vacuum where they think all pilots are like Southwest pilots. They have no concept what it's like to have a pilot group on property that would vote to strike the place by 97%. The reason is that they have been good to us and WE HAVE BEEN GOOD TO THEM. SWAPA pilots made many sacrifices over the years to get to that point. Why should we give any of our seniority up to an Airtran pilot?

So....How did that attitude work out for the Frontier guys when it came time to merge lists with the "inferior"(tic) pilots of Republic Holding?
shiznit is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 10:12 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by LuvJockey View Post
Some guys just can't control themselves, I question whether or not they're really SWA pilots. Same stuff happened here on APC during the SWA/F9 drama, an amazing number of "new hire" posters popped up never to be heard from again after about a week.

There is nothing to gain by debating it here. If you are SWA guys, let it play out like it's supposed to.
You are so correct.
shiznit is offline  
Old 03-14-2011, 06:42 AM
  #28  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 20
Default

Whackmaster, sorry it took a few days but I feel I owe you a response to your post.


SWAPA has begun the political manuevering to put them in a position of leverage over the pilots of AirTran Airways AND their own management. Yes, you read that right....their own management, too.
The Transition Agreement language was negotiated between SWA and SWAPA. Our mgmt is smarter than giving away leverage at the expense of political maneuvering by SWAPA. Our management was absolutely onboard with offering the maximum protection to current SWA pilots however. Note: Both SWA and SWAPA agreed on two-party talks.

ATTN SWAPA: Looking forward to the increased pay & benefits. Looking forward to working under a culture that's literally the opposite side of the spectrum from ours. Looking forward to wanting to do good for my company again instead of wondering how I can phuck them harder than they just phucked me (again).
If you're looking forward to these things, you had better hope your ALPA MEC wants the same thing. So far, their actions have not shown any desire to start the real process that will put your pilots on our CBA. There has been finger-poking and hollow threats of court injunctions thrown at Gary and SWA mgmt. Let your MEC keep that up and you will all get a history lesson on Muse, Transtar, etc.

Good luck!
mastercraft is offline  
Old 03-14-2011, 06:48 AM
  #29  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 20
Default

SWAPA has begun the political manuevering to put them in a position of leverage over the pilots of AirTran Airways AND their own management. Yes, you read that right....their own management, too. How do I know? Let's just say that I heard it straight from the horse's mouth through numerous lengthy conversations. Actually, I should say horses' mouth. Don't ask me to elaborate on this part.
Wow...Whackmaster knows things...secret thing that nobody else knows. But don't ask him to talk about it. He just can't. He would have to kill us all.

Whackmaster, the only way you would have heard anything 'straight from the horse's mouth' would be conversations (or should I say 'numerous lengthy conversations') with Gary, Van de Ven or our NC Chair.

So, at great risk to all who read this thread, I dare to ask you to please elaborate on this part.
mastercraft is offline  
Old 03-14-2011, 07:59 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MaxPowers's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 127
Default

Originally Posted by Bush Pilot View Post

Can you explain to me how getting to SWA is not a windfall? How many SWA pilots (captains included) have left SWA for Airtran? How about the reverse? How many AAI pilots had their application on file at SWA prior to 9/27/10? Why is that?
That is what is called an "anecdote" and it won't matter much to an Arbitrator. AirTran is only a third of the age of SWA, yet by comparison has a whole lot of upside. Where would AirTran be in another 20 years?

The aribitrator is going to look at it as two similar companies, doing the same job, flying similar equipment. They are not going to bump AirTran Pilots out of seats or out of domiciles, and my guess is that worklife won't change appreciably for either group, in terms of bidding.
MaxPowers is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HumptyDumpty
Cargo
43
02-04-2011 03:58 PM
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
sl0wr0ll3r
United
114
11-22-2010 03:40 PM
captexpress
Cargo
48
11-07-2008 10:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices