Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Proposed FAA Rest Requirements: Sept 14, 2010 >

Proposed FAA Rest Requirements: Sept 14, 2010

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Proposed FAA Rest Requirements: Sept 14, 2010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-08-2011, 05:36 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: A-320/A
Posts: 588
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
We did Transcon turns for 12 years in the Navy including west coast to Hawaii and back. When we flew during working hours it was a lot easier on the body then some of the crap DAL does now:

LAX 0445 sign in - GMAFB! If I was unfortunate enough to get this heap of crap I think I would just sleep in the Pilot lounge. Why not give this to an east crew laying over vice an originating west coast crew?

East coast 0630 push-back on day two of a 4 day west coast trip - Yikes!

So yes, with the proper restrictions, it would be OK with me. But as with everything, the devil is in the details. We will see just how much pull the industry lobbyists have when the final proposal is released.

Scoop
I seriously doubt that you flew those turns out of LGA or JKF. Perhaps out of some military airfield with 8-12 departures per hour, no gate holding, a "follow-me" truck, and a Master Chief Petty Officer coordinating ramp procedures....then, yes, I too see how it would be possible to do coast to coast turns within the FAR limits. In an airline environment, maybe if you could flight plan your Mach # at M.93 or so....


(BTW, I'm agreeing with you here, Scoop)
chuck416 is offline  
Old 08-08-2011, 06:04 AM
  #22  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by chuck416 View Post
I seriously doubt that you flew those turns out of LGA or JKF. Perhaps out of some military airfield with 8-12 departures per hour, no gate holding, a "follow-me" truck, and a Master Chief Petty Officer coordinating ramp procedures....then, yes, I too see how it would be possible to do coast to coast turns within the FAR limits. In an airline environment, maybe if you could flight plan your Mach # at M.93 or so....


(BTW, I'm agreeing with you here, Scoop)

Chuck,

I can assume you never flew out of Hickam AFB as a transient Navy crew. Some of the crap we had to put up with their rivaled any of the JFK BS.

Seriously though, that's why I said the devil is in the details. Everything you mention already happens to crews flying 14 up to 16 (and possibly longer) hour duty days. If we can shorten that to 11-13 hours, based on science, I personally think that is a good thing.

I would rather be in the cockpit flying then vegetating in Newark for a 3 1/2 hour sit with two legs left (I actually had this once) but I realize everybody has their own preference.

Scoop

Last edited by Scoop; 08-08-2011 at 06:19 AM.
Scoop is offline  
Old 08-08-2011, 06:52 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

It's funny to read from people who went right from the military to the majors complain about schedules. You have no concept of the abuse of the regionals that many of us were subject to for years and years.

Sitting for 3 1/2 hours and still having two turns? Welcome to a common pairing every week at every regional. Try scheduled 14 hour duty days and 5 legs into minimum rest.

These rest rules will have little impact at Delta, but most every other part 121 operation will see improvements far beyond our best day of contract negotiations. My current employer uses the FARs as most work rules... this is common outside of the majors. Lets hope the focus stays in place until this is voted on and made law.
labbats is offline  
Old 08-08-2011, 07:27 AM
  #24  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by labbats View Post
It's funny to read from people who went right from the military to the majors complain about schedules. You have no concept of the abuse of the regionals that many of us were subject to for years and years.

Sitting for 3 1/2 hours and still having two turns? Welcome to a common pairing every week at every regional. Try scheduled 14 hour duty days and 5 legs into minimum rest.

These rest rules will have little impact at Delta, but most every other part 121 operation will see improvements far beyond our best day of contract negotiations. My current employer uses the FARs as most work rules... this is common outside of the majors. Lets hope the focus stays in place until this is voted on and made law.

Labbats,

You are 100% correct - everything is relative.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 08-08-2011, 07:51 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
APC225's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,866
Default

Originally Posted by labbats View Post
My current employer uses the FARs as most work rules...
Well put, and they want it for UAL as well. Fortunately, the UAL pilots aren't used to this abuse which is why negotiations seem to have hung up in the scheduling section.
APC225 is offline  
Old 08-08-2011, 01:23 PM
  #26  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy View Post
Don't worry. I'm sure CAPA will kill the most onerous of these provisions...
Well, I really don't know who CAPA is, nor do I much care, but when I put pencil to paper and look at what COULD be with some of our city pairs, I really don't like the provision of this 13 hour duty period day and 10 hour flight time limits. They drafted this from the perspective of a DC bureaucrat that works a 9-5ish job, and not from the perspective of a NYC commuter that might have a train 2 hours or sit in traffic 2+hours to even get to work. 7am is great is you work in Crystal City and ride the train from Herndon, but not if you live in the Bronx and work at JFK.

/RANT

What I am hoping comes out of all this after it is rammed down our throats is that DALPA will write better language into the contract that will not allow this kind of scheduling. Otherwise, I fear that we will see some unsafe fatigue issues coming to the forefront, and wasn't this the purpose of this legislation in the first place?
tsquare is offline  
Old 08-09-2011, 05:50 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

a poster from CAL said their mgmt said about a 15% increase there to cover the F/D/Rest rules.

cliff
GRB
atpcliff is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
steel
Cargo
28
02-18-2011 06:56 PM
vagabond
Aviation Law
2
12-10-2010 06:56 AM
OnTheKlacker
Major
208
09-09-2010 12:36 AM
learav8r
Major
2
08-11-2006 08:10 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
2
07-04-2006 05:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices