Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
US/DL Slot Swap Approved >

US/DL Slot Swap Approved

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

US/DL Slot Swap Approved

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2011, 07:26 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Elliot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: "Prof" button manipulator
Posts: 1,685
Default

Originally Posted by tsquared030 View Post
Or, buy them, put a gun to their heads and make them vote for a deal that screws them. All so you can say it was, "mutually agreed" upon.

T

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ma...-s-l-10-a.html
Elliot is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:25 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
So, let's see.

If I remember correctly, the Southwest/Air Tran combination will give the new Southwest somewhere in the vicinity of 90% of the flights out of BWI and that's ok.

But, what US Air is going to have out of DCA is problematic and still under DOJ scrutiny.

Really?
This is the same group that got EWR slots b/c UA and CAL were merging, moved into LUV knowing the airport was prohibited from serving most domestic markets and now has essentially eliminated those same restrictions, and appears to have undermined the very intent of federal legislation designed to ensure merged employee groups are treated equitably.

They'll get more LGA and DCA slots too out of this too. Just wait.

Pretty impressive, honestly.

Why would US Airways give up their superior LGA presence to a competitor to get more of a lock on DCA - except for a merger set-up? Even if it is for a merger, who wants DCA over LGA?
Sniper is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:39 AM
  #33  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow View Post
So, let's see.

If I remember correctly, the Southwest/Air Tran combination will give the new Southwest somewhere in the vicinity of 90% of the flights out of BWI and that's ok.

But, what US Air is going to have out of DCA is problematic and still under DOJ scrutiny.

Really?
The way to solve this is flood BWI with flights, demand slots to deal with delay issues, demand a fair share, sue.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:51 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jughead's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL717A
Posts: 890
Default

Nevermind...
Jughead is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:55 AM
  #35  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

LCC may just want to get this deal done to get on with the next deal they have been sitting on since this thing was announced in 2009. It really has slowed/stopped the M and A's that involve DAL and LCC.

Once this deal is done, I see a few more tie ups.

As for AMR, their market cap is under a billion dollars. Fragmentation, or a hostile stock buyout are very real possibilities before a CH11 filing. One in CH11 anyone could offer a better offer to the creditors. The one airline in position to do much of this is DAL.

Many of the creditors would like one less airline, and less capacity as result. AMR is very aware of this, and IMO will do anything they can to avoid CH11. B6 and LCC are to very likely tie ups. With LCC depending on who is in the divers seat; AMR or LCC, DFW or PHX would be up for sale.

LCC getting rid of the LGA slots makes perfect sense if the next move is AMR/B6.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:58 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper View Post
This is the same group that got EWR slots b/c UA and CAL were merging, moved into LUV knowing the airport was prohibited from serving most domestic markets and now has essentially eliminated those same restrictions, and appears to have undermined the very intent of federal legislation designed to ensure merged employee groups are treated equitably.

They'll get more LGA and DCA slots too out of this too. Just wait.

Pretty impressive, honestly.

Why would US Airways give up their superior LGA presence to a competitor to get more of a lock on DCA - except for a merger set-up? Even if it is for a merger, who wants DCA over LGA?
IMO DCA compared to IAD/BWI is way more desirable than LGA is compared to JFK (EWR is another story as calling it a "New York City Airport is laughable at best).

For a long time airlines scoffed at the idea that JFK could be a viable domestic hub and other than the big international push bank it was a ghost town. Then JB came along and showed all the airlines that while people may theoretically prefer LGA, in the end no one really cares; its all about fares, network and service.

For anyone going anywhere in the DC area other than the burbs near IAD, Dulles is a joke. DCA is where its at, by far, and unless scheduled service to Andrews starts anytime soon (ha!) it will remain the exclusive preferred domestic airport in the DC area by a wide margin.

Its smart for USAir because not only do they get to set themselves up for a merger with someone with a NYC network, they also lock in their next bailout because the congress critters LOVE their nonstop DCA service to little podunk towns far and wide and with such a massive DCA network, USAir will be "too DC to fail".

I agree that SWA will likely get even more charity out of this deal, although their days as "most favored nation" are coming to a close. Not to mention its high time someone force them to divest LUV slots. Maybe if Delta revamps Dallas as a legitimate focus city, we can shift everything to LUV and squeal unfairness and get a nice chunk of slots..like a third to half. They should be OK with that, right? We can throw in a complete and instant repeal of Wright, which they want so we will be more than willing to compromise!

Can't wait to hear them querying in ATL and soon much more in NYC about why they aren't getting the preference they are so used to and entitled to.
gloopy is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 11:44 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Default

Originally Posted by cactiboss View Post
Should not be an issue at all, according to east pilots the majority wishes take precedence in sli integration, plus I'm sure the apa wants to go by strict doh so the easts 16 year furloughed pilots can take their rightfull place in the left seat of amr''s widebody's
Look at the National/Pan Am merger...Pan Am had a large number of pilots on furlough, they were not able to come back and displace working pilots....even those on the bottom of the list.
iceman49 is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 11:54 AM
  #38  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Gloopy,
I don't think DAL should make Luv a focus city, I think Allegiant should and we should help them get those gates.

SWA would be begging us to come to LUV if that was on the table.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 12:22 PM
  #39  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Its the only non legacy fragmentation way they can get a dominant foothold in the most important domestic market in the world.
Makes zero sense. Unless you think that since GK has broken the SWA model he would go for broke.. than maybe, but otherwise, nope.
tsquare is offline  
Old 10-12-2011, 12:56 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
Makes zero sense. Unless you think that since GK has broken the SWA model he would go for broke.. than maybe, but otherwise, nope.
Their model has many elements, but the main one is to be a domestic powerhouse. They can't fulfill their manifest destiny without a massive NYC presence. The paultry LGA and token EWR presence they have isn't going to cut it. They can't do it "organically" anymore. Its too late. They had their chance when JFK was a ghost town and they blew it. Now they will have to make a far more ambitious move or be locked out of ever having a significant presence in the most vital market in the country.

They are the biggest domestic airline in the world. NYC is the biggest, and most vital, domestic market in the world. SWA has a tiny NYC presence. A legacy fragmentation or liquidation or buying JB are the only ways SWA can ever get a significant share of NYC traffic.

The failed model of distant secondary airports to serve major markets is in the past. ISP won't cut it and SWA knows that.

Fares are low all over the place and SWA's costs aren't what they used to be. The level of presence they have only affords them the ability to do extremely limited service relative to numerous other NYC airlines like DL, AA, JB, UCAL, etc. To give NYC customers a significant market network with the level of NYC presence SWA has will require a massive percentage of customers to have to change planes in a SWA hub. That won't work anymore. SWA isn't cheap like they used to be. Far from it actually. And NYC customers can enjoy far superior networks from DL, JB, AA and UCAL. SWA needs NYC and there are very, very few ways for them to get what they need.

As for SWA being "too busy" for another integration move, JB is 100% non union. That puts SWA more in the driver's seat than any other move they could make short of picking up the pieces of a legacy liquidation. That appears unlikely at best. SWA has an amemic and flimsy presence in the most crucial market in the country and they are out of airspeed and ideas getting that organically. JB is the only realistic way for them to be a player in the number one market in the nation. If they can't/won't/don't then they will likely forever be a distant 4th or 5th rate choice in the number 1 market, which is fine with me. I just don't see them being OK with that.
gloopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Piedmonster
Major
74
07-27-2011 08:05 AM
Zayghami
Military
31
03-09-2010 02:38 AM
F172Driver
Military
3
07-31-2009 12:30 PM
yacko
Military
12
08-18-2008 06:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices