Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Northwest A-320 - DC-9 ground collision video >

Northwest A-320 - DC-9 ground collision video

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Northwest A-320 - DC-9 ground collision video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2006, 11:07 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Tech Maven's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: A320 F/O
Posts: 510
Default Northwest A-320 - DC-9 ground collision video

http://kstp.dayport.com/viewer/viewe...?Art_ID=167944

you will need the ActiveX plugin to view. Use internet explorer and you won't have any probs-

TM
Tech Maven is offline  
Old 07-11-2006, 04:50 AM
  #2  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Ugh. Watch the video, but turn down the sound. Nothing but "disaster" reporting. I like how they have somebody from a medical consulting (Alina Medical) company talking about the properties of jet fuel and how "it could have exploded."

Some tidbits:

"...experts that have viewed the tape still wonder- how it is the two planes didn't explode on impact..."
"...thousands of gallons of fuel..."
"...out of control DC-9... Slams into the airbus, pushing it 60 feet..."
"...the collision is violent... jet fuel pours out... a single spark could have created a fireball..."
"...its an ignition source away from- a catastrophe. Just an amazing catastrophe..."
"...by many accounts could have been the deadliest MN has seen..."

Pretty amazing how much momentum/mass the DC-9 has against the Airbus... it gave the plane a pretty good push.
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 07-11-2006, 06:01 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Short Final's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Bus/Left
Posts: 103
Default

Agreed.

Turn the sound off for this one. I am so sick of local news stations making up for their ignorance with hype and fear just to keep us tuned in.

Thanks TM
Short Final is offline  
Old 07-11-2006, 10:13 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Any, usually behind the wing
Posts: 382
Default

Pretty scary, but then again, I had the sound on. I suppose one of the last words before impact was "duck!" They really nailed the Airbus. One question, if they we're having, or had, hydraulic difficulties, why were they taxying in at "speed"?
OldAg84 is offline  
Old 07-11-2006, 10:39 AM
  #5  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by OldAg84
Pretty scary, but then again, I had the sound on. I suppose one of the last words before impact was "duck!" They really nailed the Airbus. One question, if they we're having, or had, hydraulic difficulties, why were they taxying in at "speed"?
A better question would be, "why were they taxiing at all?" Better to just set the brake and let the company tow you in, than have the alternative happen. Might be a bit inconvenient, but I would guess that a full-blown NTSB investigation is worse...
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 07-11-2006, 11:38 AM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,227
Default

You'd think they could have thrown out the TR's...don't DC-9s do powerbacks?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 07-11-2006, 12:20 PM
  #7  
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
FlyerJosh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Executive Transport Driver
Posts: 3,080
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
You'd think they could have thrown out the TR's...don't DC-9s do powerbacks?
The hydraulic failure could have prevented the deployment of the buckets... I don't know enough about the DC-9s systems to tell.
FlyerJosh is offline  
Old 07-11-2006, 01:19 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Any, usually behind the wing
Posts: 382
Default

Rick- I'm hazarding a guess based on what was said by those on the video; but I got the impression that the hydraulics failed suddenly and "completely" whilst there was very little time to react- even if they could've been deployed (which I read in Josh's previous post might not be doable with hydraulic loss), I'm guessing there wasn't a lot of time.

Bottom line- everyone wound up OK.
OldAg84 is offline  
Old 07-12-2006, 05:02 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: EMB170 FO
Posts: 168
Default

Notice the time on the clock behind the guy reporter: 4:20. Real classy
C175 is offline  
Old 10-15-2006, 06:23 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
Default

That's insane. It looks like the Capt may have gotten a haircut from that one!
Crossroads is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redbaron84
Major
1
12-25-2005 09:49 PM
CRM1337
Major
1
10-02-2005 07:12 AM
captain_drew
Major
0
08-19-2005 03:16 PM
Sir James
Major
2
03-17-2005 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices