Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Where is DAL going to let Alaska the 73-900ER >

Where is DAL going to let Alaska the 73-900ER

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Where is DAL going to let Alaska the 73-900ER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2012, 04:09 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by captnmajic View Post
Alaska will fly THEIR new jets wherever ALASKA wants to fly them!

Period.
Which might spell the end of the code share....which I would welcome. If you don't think AK and DL are coordinating their routes you are naive and uninformed. That's why it's a code share!
buzzpat is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 04:13 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Cool

Originally Posted by Clear Right View Post
Exactly right,
The Delta pilot arrogance with regard to Alaska kills me. Alaska is a highly successful stand-alone air carrier. Yes, your stagnation at DAL does suck, but personally I would spend more of your time and effort on the RJs and I wouldn't worry about Alaskas 737-900s. If you can't compete with Alaska on the west coast, then sucks to be you. Buy them or Merge with them, but in the mean time why blame your stagnation and "capacity discipline" on Alaska...just my opinion.
OK, we'll buy them.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 04:14 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat View Post
OK, we'll buy them.
We could buy them and use their cash on hand to help pay for it.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 04:17 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
buzzpat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Urban chicken rancher.
Posts: 6,070
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
737.. trans oceanic... ugh.
Wouldn't be as bad as BOS-LAX, NYC-LAX or PHL-LAX. We do all of those now.
buzzpat is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 04:30 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pelican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 737 f/o
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Its not that we can't compete with AS on the west coast, its that we choose to outsource. AS is becoming like Chautauqua with 737's. JB isn't far behind but needs a massive gutting of AA scope to make it happen. The only arrogance you will see at DL about AS is with the ones not willing to put the AS code share abuse as a high priority in negotiations. Take away AA and DL pax from AS and AS is hurtfar more than DL or AA. Despite the propaganda that they "fill up our widebodies" we still give them twice the pax they give us. Its easy to grow when other airlines call up up and give you pax. At least for a while.

I know you think there is a bright future in being a code share proxy airline leveraging lower unit costs and living in endless growth mode. AS is in their RJ-airline high phase WRT that right now, just like the regionals a decade ago, but it won't last forever. If for any other reason than they will likely be merged with DL or AA before they can conquer the world flying all airline 737's around the country with Eskimo tails.

Its actually a shame to see them devolve into a Chautauqua-esque code share proxy on a large scale like this. They are a storied and innovative airline the likes of which have lead the industry in many areas. To watch them try and morph into an "all aboard!" ACMI regional is pathetic. For thier sake as wel as ours, I hope that one way or another that nonsense ends real soon. If not, while they may benefit from unbalanced deals with DL and AA, eventually they will come back down to reality quite harshly, especially if they don't have some of the strongest scope in the industry, and from what I've seen they don't.
There is that DL arrogance. Comparing AS to Chautauqua, are you serious? Last I checked our 737 rates are pretty similar to yours....oh but I'm sorry, we didn't go bankrupt and dumped everybody's retirement plan like most out there. So when comparing us to Chautauqua what are the similarities? It's not like AS is growing exponentially with all this flying DL "Allows us to do". We have furloughed and stagnated just like everybody else over the past 3-5 years. This is about the most conservatively run operation in the industry, that's why we've been around for 80 years! We're not an over-night, start-up, we've been around and defended our niche for almost as long as DL has been around (+ - a few years). I suggest you get over yourselves, your school-yard bullying is getting old.
Pelican is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 07:04 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Pelican View Post
There is that DL arrogance. Comparing AS to Chautauqua, are you serious? Last I checked our 737 rates are pretty similar to yours....oh but I'm sorry, we didn't go bankrupt and dumped everybody's retirement plan like most out there. So when comparing us to Chautauqua what are the similarities? It's not like AS is growing exponentially with all this flying DL "Allows us to do". We have furloughed and stagnated just like everybody else over the past 3-5 years. This is about the most conservatively run operation in the industry, that's why we've been around for 80 years! We're not an over-night, start-up, we've been around and defended our niche for almost as long as DL has been around (+ - a few years). I suggest you get over yourselves, your school-yard bullying is getting old.
It has nothing to do with schoolyard bullying. If your management was in a code share agreement with another airline and was dumping up to 86 seats per flight on routes you could easilly do and many that you used to do, in some cases 12+ flights a day between a city pair with other airlines doing it too and your airline being shut out, you wouldn't like it one bit. AS shareholders and pilots are benefiting immensely from their extremely favorable agreements with AA and DL but its not going to last.

Your rates are in line with everyone else's BK rates. Hopefully we all raise them soon. That's not the point. Our management is dumping pax into your system because they are hell bent on avoiding capex and adding capacity right now at any cost to get debt down and AA is going through a rough patch to say the least. One of the strong arm "term sheet" things those cut throat labor busters desprately want is an unlimited code share with AS and JB. Why do you think that is? I hope you can see that while it may benefit you today, it is a huge negative blow to all things airline pilot and needs to stop.

AS is being used just like Chautauqua (and Mesa and others) as an ACMI outsource provider but instead of an air service agreement where you buy an entire flight, we invest nothing and fill up to half of any given AS flight. Clearly you can see how that is not a good thing for the piloting profession when a management team is given the ability to do that. You benefit from it today, with a very one sided agreement, but you will not always. In any case it is not something you should celebrate or be proud of.

I've said many times that AS is a legendary innovator and operational pioneer. That is why it is a crying shame to see them devolve into a regional that fills itself up with other airline's passengers. Its lazy on both our management's parts. Fortunately it will be over with a merger with either AA or DL, which I hope happens because the present situation is rediculous.

I respect the history of Alaska Airlines and its pilots, but not this one sided code share. Ending madness like this isn't just a DL or AA issue. If this crap is allowed to continue, it WILL come back to bite your pilot group one day.
gloopy is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 07:29 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pelican's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 737 f/o
Posts: 299
Default

So I'm still confused about what or who you're ****ed at and what I should do about it. I'm not the smartest person in the world so I've attempted to break it down to three possibilities.

1. You're ****ed at us AS pilots for weakening the profession by hauling YOUR passengers on OUR airplanes? What should I do about that? Refuse to allow YOUR passengers on OUR airplanes in attempt to allow DL pilots to grow, upgrade and live happily ever after?

2. Your ****ed at AS management for securing an agreement favorable to its employees, and shareholders? In which they should do what? Tell DL management, thanks but no thanks, we don't want your money?

3. Your ****ed at your own company? Then I suggest you take that up with them an quit blaming it on everyone else around you for your misery.

We are in fact outsourcing on our own. Do I blame skywest for flying Horizon airplanes on Horizon/Alaska routes and get ****ed at their pilots for degrading the profession? No, I don't, I am thankful my company is smart enough to reallocate it's resources into profitable markets and act responsibly enough to not declare bankruptcy and not destroy the pensions of thousands of employees. If I had to choose between sitting in the right seat for an extra 5 years or whatever the case may be, or upgrading tomorrow, going bankrupt in 5 years and losing everything.....I'd choose right seat.
Pelican is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 08:14 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Pelican View Post
So I'm still confused about what or who you're ****ed at and what I should do about it. I'm not the smartest person in the world so I've attempted to break it down to three possibilities.

1. You're ****ed at us AS pilots for weakening the profession by hauling YOUR passengers on OUR airplanes? What should I do about that? Refuse to allow YOUR passengers on OUR airplanes in attempt to allow DL pilots to grow, upgrade and live happily ever after?
Nope. Its not your fault our scope sucks. But I'd be very careful thinking this is a good deal for you or your company. This is symptomatic of labor's weakness and if its not fixed they WILL use it on you someday.

2. Your ****ed at AS management for securing an agreement favorable to its employees, and shareholders? In which they should do what? Tell DL management, thanks but no thanks, we don't want your money?
Nope. DL offered them easy money, they would be as crazy not to take it as any regional in a guaranteed profit RFP.

3. Your ****ed at your own company? Then I suggest you take that up with them an quit blaming it on everyone else around you for your misery.

Yep. I am and we are. Altough I suspect it just may resolve itself with what's going on with AA and DL's desire to be tip of the spear in the next round of consolidation. I actually think we would make a great team and our route structures go together better than just about any 2 unmerged airlines in history.

If I had to choose between sitting in the right seat for an extra 5 years or whatever the case may be, or upgrading tomorrow, going bankrupt in 5 years and losing everything.....I'd choose right seat.
LOL yeah OK, outsource or go bankrupt. We really are our own worst enemies.

As for your comment on SkyWest, they were brought in to labor bust Horizon, which existed as a separate labor group in no small part to keep your costs in check but they got too expensive, even for a regional. Its not about getting mad at SKYW pilots. That would be fruitless. But the system is screwed up and we all need to make it a priority to change.
gloopy is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 08:33 PM
  #29  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by Pelican View Post
There is that DL arrogance. Comparing AS to Chautauqua, are you serious? Last I checked our 737 rates are pretty similar to yours....oh but I'm sorry, we didn't go bankrupt and dumped everybody's retirement plan like most out there. So when comparing us to Chautauqua what are the similarities? It's not like AS is growing exponentially with all this flying DL "Allows us to do". We have furloughed and stagnated just like everybody else over the past 3-5 years. This is about the most conservatively run operation in the industry, that's why we've been around for 80 years! We're not an over-night, start-up, we've been around and defended our niche for almost as long as DL has been around (+ - a few years). I suggest you get over yourselves, your school-yard bullying is getting old.

Pelican,

Most DAL Pilots know that Alaska is a great operation with Top rate Pilots. What upsets a lot of DAL Pilots is going to the Delta travel site, looking up Delta flights, say LAX to SEA and seeing 10 Alaska flights listed.

This discussion should have nothing to do with the quality of the Airlines or the Pilots - its about DAL management flying a lot pf passengers on Alaska airlines - far more passengers in proportion to the Alaska passengers that DAL flies.

We would like to fly as many of our passengers as possible just as I am sure you guys would like to fly as many of your passengers as possible.

Both great airlines with great histories and traditions.


Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 08:50 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Right Window
Posts: 138
Default

Have you Delta guys considered that we might fill up half of your flights from time to time? Code share goes both ways...
FlyAK is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike734
Alaska
42
01-12-2022 12:10 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Lone Palm
Regional
5
01-25-2011 09:48 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
Freight Dog
Major
1
05-02-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices