|
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1204278)
Quite frankly that was one of the few items in the TA that has my complete support and respect.
That part is pure unadulterated union stuff. It's long been my chief complaint about ALPA. An organization that has somehow forgotten why and how ALPA exists. This is one of those few instances where someone remembered and insisted and recognition of that is in order. Cheers George |
Originally Posted by More Bacon
(Post 1195367)
ALPA is a poisoned well.
Even if we recall every single rep, we're still stuck wasting money on a "union" that must look out for RJ pilots as much as they look out for us. Our interests are subjugated. How much juice was spent to get the "ALPA carrier" hiring requirements in our TA? I don't think that was anywhere in the survey. The fact that it is in there is proof ALPA has a conflict of interest. Our TA is being used to get ALPA more cred with DCI. Why is our NC carrying the water for those who are not DAL pilots? Nothing against those guys, I wish them well, but if you did not see the conflict of interest before you now have the proof right in front of your eyes. The only question is what we gave up to get it for ALPA. Disgraceful. |
Originally Posted by Jesse
(Post 1204457)
[/B]
The fact that it is in there is proof ALPA has a conflict of interest. Our TA is being used to get ALPA more cred with DCI. Why is our NC carrying the water for those who are not DAL pilots? Nothing against those guys, I wish them well, but if you did not see the conflict of interest before you now have the proof right in front of your eyes. The only question is what we gave up to get it for ALPA. Disgraceful. This TA has Lee Moak and ALPA National all over it. I would say it's in there to protect ALPA's butts in case of another law suit for failure to represent the RJ carriers. |
Originally Posted by crewdawg52
(Post 1204498)
This TA has Lee Moak and ALPA National all over it. I would say it's in there to protect ALPA's butts in case of another law suit for failure to represent the RJ carriers.
|
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1204518)
making 600k and working on Tuesdays.
|
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1204518)
That rascal Moak again, if it weren't for him we would all be making 600k and working on Tuesdays.
He phoned me up a couple months ago and said "you know, I never thought I'd say this, but after working with Moak for a little while, I completely understand why you put in your DPA card. He has a very strong influence over O'Malley and the current administration at DALPA, you cannot deny that. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1204630)
I have a friend that is a group lead at national.
He phoned me up a couple months ago and said "you know, I never thought I'd say this, but after working with Moak for a little while, I completely understand why you put in your DPA card. He has a very strong influence over O'Malley and the current administration at DALPA, you cannot deny that. |
Originally Posted by finis72
(Post 1204650)
I think you are selling O'Malley and our MEC short.
They just got steamrolled by the NC--or they were too weak to exert their influence over the proceedings. How exactly are we "selling them short?" |
Originally Posted by More Bacon
(Post 1204711)
Seriously?
They just got steamrolled by the NC--or they were too weak to exert their influence over the proceedings. How exactly are we "selling them short?" |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1204274)
It is management's job to figure out what could pass by 50.1%.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:25 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands