Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Uh oh!! Virgin America >

Uh oh!! Virgin America

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Uh oh!! Virgin America

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2012, 06:54 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
swamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Delta chihuahua Capt.
Posts: 462
Default

Originally Posted by Delta1067 View Post
and Shy Guy chimes in in 3,,,2,,,,1......
He sure is quiet.. That or he is too busy reading and commenting on the 50 topics about pinnacle...
swamp is offline  
Old 11-17-2012, 04:53 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Imapilot2's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Captain Jack
Posts: 1,003
Default

Originally Posted by swamp View Post
He sure is quiet.. That or he is too busy reading and commenting on the 50 topics about pinnacle...

and how those low life's over there should be smart like him and "move up" to the better jobs
Imapilot2 is offline  
Old 11-17-2012, 06:57 AM
  #23  
First Rule of Fight Club
 
BoredwLife's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: My seat smells like cat pee
Posts: 1,536
Default

So what is it with this airline? Why do so many of you seem to take joy in them struggling or possibly going under?

Have you ever been on Virgin? I have and while the market for their product is small, damn am I impressed. They do it right, treat you like gold, and are extremely friendly.

Is it cause Branson is English and successful? British invasion fears?

Maybe its cause I work for NK and while we continue to make money hand over fist, I am never proud of the product we offer.

I want virgin to survive. I want to see if someone can bring some class back to the industry.
BoredwLife is offline  
Old 11-17-2012, 07:15 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fins Up's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Passed out in my hammock
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by TurboDVR42 View Post
On a personal note, I am happy to see the airline is making money.
Why are we as a pilot group want more pilots on a street? The excuse of "there low pay rates" is getting old. The airline has been in business for 5 years, what do you guys expect?
If you ever have to write anything professionally, I suggest having it proofread by somebody else.
Fins Up is offline  
Old 11-17-2012, 08:15 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TurboDVR42's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: -800
Posts: 386
Default

Originally Posted by Fins Up View Post
If you ever have to write anything professionally, I suggest having it proofread by somebody else.
Thanks for the heads up
TurboDVR42 is offline  
Old 11-17-2012, 09:28 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 36N15
Posts: 323
Default

I think you've hit on the problem for VX. Their market is small. Too small to make money without large cash infusions from Branson. My take is that the whole operation was envisioned as a feeder for Atlantic and an attempt to break into the largest passenger market in the world.

However, I think they missed the mark by emphasizing style over economy. The average US passenger is more sensitive to price vs perks with the notable exception of mileage plans.

The markets VX keeps trying to crack are mileage plan fortresses with extremely loyal customers. They may ride VX once, but they will stick with their gold status. And the non-mileage people look for pricing....period.
Moby Dick is offline  
Old 11-17-2012, 09:38 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 480
Default

“Open Skies”, and a different US election result, is probably Branson’s end game for VA. A Romney win would have insured its passage, with Branson’s lobbying efforts.
Xbone is offline  
Old 11-17-2012, 09:47 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by Moby Dick View Post
I think you've hit on the problem for VX. Their market is small. Too small to make money without large cash infusions from Branson. My take is that the whole operation was envisioned as a feeder for Atlantic and an attempt to break into the largest passenger market in the world.

However, I think they missed the mark by emphasizing style over economy. The average US passenger is more sensitive to price vs perks with the notable exception of mileage plans.

The markets VX keeps trying to crack are mileage plan fortresses with extremely loyal customers. They may ride VX once, but they will stick with their gold status. And the non-mileage people look for pricing....period.
Which is why Virgin announced status matches for AA and UAL statuses:
Virgin America launches frequent flyer status match program - Pack Up - Boston.com

They're also now allowing people to use their points on Hawaiian
atooraya is offline  
Old 11-17-2012, 10:37 AM
  #29  
I have shiny jet syndrome
 
RJtrashPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: ELACS, FACs and SECs. Who doesn't love 'em?
Posts: 984
Default

Originally Posted by Xbone View Post
“Open Skies”, and a different US election result, is probably Branson’s end game for VA. A Romney win would have insured its passage, with Branson’s lobbying efforts.
I didn't realize Romney was in the insurance business, too.

Last edited by RJtrashPilot; 11-17-2012 at 10:56 AM.
RJtrashPilot is offline  
Old 11-17-2012, 10:39 AM
  #30  
I have shiny jet syndrome
 
RJtrashPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: ELACS, FACs and SECs. Who doesn't love 'em?
Posts: 984
Default

The way this news is being spun internally is that while the operation is profitable and will be in the 4th quarter and solidly profitable for full year 2013, the net corporate loss is due to paying off investors. They keep telling us "the investors are definitely getting their money out of us".

I don't know whether I buy that or not. I'm still on the fence and don't know what to believe. It's easy to make the numbers look however they want since the company is privately held. I want to believe them. However, this is my 3rd airline and I've been lied to my entire career and have been trained to not trust what management says. But, this is a different company and (at least on the surface) they seem to legitimately try to do things differently here when it comes to management/labor relations, especially in terms of communication. But my ultimate fear, which I can't shake out of my head, is that this may be a case of "keep the cattle grazing until it's time to go to the slaughter house". I hope I'm wrong.

Last edited by RJtrashPilot; 11-17-2012 at 10:55 AM.
RJtrashPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OAKLAND
Major
100
10-04-2012 07:00 AM
4andCounting
Major
0
05-25-2011 12:42 PM
F9niner
Major
22
01-12-2010 06:52 AM
Moose
Major
67
04-07-2009 08:32 AM
Sir James
Major
13
05-24-2006 06:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices