Alaska Airlines Scope
12-14-2012, 06:04 AM
#1
Moderator
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Alaska Airlines Scope
Alaska pilots, what are your scope protections?
Skywest Inc just finalized a deal for 100 MRJ90 aircraft, with options for 100 more. These aircraft are too large to be flown for UAL(assuming TA approval) or DAL even under a Codeshare agreement. I'm not sure about American Airlines.
But what about Alaska Airlines?
Skywest Inc just finalized a deal for 100 MRJ90 aircraft, with options for 100 more. These aircraft are too large to be flown for UAL(assuming TA approval) or DAL even under a Codeshare agreement. I'm not sure about American Airlines.
But what about Alaska Airlines?
12-14-2012, 06:10 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
First the plane has'nt even flown yet... Second numbers change all the time this early in the "development" stage... They get into testing ect, the Max takeoff weight may drop or go up... Look at the 717. Depending on the waranty you want the max landing and Takeoff changes... Maybe SkyWest told them they have to come in at the majical 86,000 lbs or the contract is void... Im sure both partys have alot of this figured out.. The MRJ90 is no more then a CRJ900.... Plus i Doubt the "smart" Alaska group would add 100 RJ's, thats equal to Alaska's mainline fleet in numbers.....
12-14-2012, 06:25 AM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
From what I have been told Alaska's scope emulates the codeshare partner they provide feed for, essentially they do not have scope however that was to be addressed this contract. It is worth mentioning that Skywest is ordering MRJs, they have a west coast operation and the MRJ does not fit the scope profile for any major I am aware of. Alaska is supposedly selling their -700's.
It's going to get interesting, one cannot get cocky about gaining another's flying in this industry.
It's going to get interesting, one cannot get cocky about gaining another's flying in this industry.
12-14-2012, 07:36 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,203
Originally Posted by johnso29
That isn't an answer to my question. 
12-14-2012, 01:01 PM
#7
New boss = Old boss
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Ca B737
Posts: 2,762
When the -400s and -700s get replaced by new -800s and new Max aircraft there will be a gap between 76 seats in the DH8 and 156 seats in the -800. That's a big gap. What aircraft will fill that gap? The MRJ90? Who will fly them? Skywest? We are addressing scope in our negotiations but......
It looks like Horizon is gearing up to take over SE Alaska flying some time in the future. There is even talk of rebranding Alaska.
I foresee a future where Horizon takes over the Alaska flying/brand and Alaska is folded in to another airline for long haul domestic flying or is rebranded entirely.
Times, they are a-changing.
It looks like Horizon is gearing up to take over SE Alaska flying some time in the future. There is even talk of rebranding Alaska.
I foresee a future where Horizon takes over the Alaska flying/brand and Alaska is folded in to another airline for long haul domestic flying or is rebranded entirely.
Times, they are a-changing.
12-14-2012, 02:35 PM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 737 FO...
Posts: 204
Originally Posted by johnso29
That isn't an answer to my question.
All former SKYW pilots at AS are scared shaetless about this, but of course, most of the senior guys are saying "no...it's ok...Brad wouldn't do that to us...." Now, I like Brad, but nothing surprises me in the industry any longer.
Mookie
12-14-2012, 08:10 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 126
[QUOTE=mike734;1311857]When the -400s and -700s get replaced by new -800s and new Max aircraft there will be a gap between 76 seats in the DH8 and 156 seats in the -800. That's a big gap. What aircraft will fill that gap? The MRJ90? Who will fly them? Skywest?
This question was asked during FP and the director of fleet planning said it would be more efficient for AAG to run 76 seat q400s in frequency than a small jet ie 80-110 seats. The 737-700 was then stated as the least efficient plane on property.
This question was asked during FP and the director of fleet planning said it would be more efficient for AAG to run 76 seat q400s in frequency than a small jet ie 80-110 seats. The 737-700 was then stated as the least efficient plane on property.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
