Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Protect OUR future. Sign the petition now. (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/79689-protect-our-future-sign-petition-now.html)

shiznit 02-06-2014 09:44 AM

Protect OUR future. Sign the petition now.
 
#denyNAI | Tell Obama to deny Norwegian Air Shuttle's application to fly into the US

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/me...nai-scheme.jpg

ALPA to U.S. Government: Reject Norwegian Air’s Evasive Scheme
Foreign Company Seeks to Exploit Legal and Regulatory Loopholes to Evade its National Laws and Gain Economic Advantage over U.S. Airlines

WASHINGTON–The Air Line Pilots Association, Int’l (ALPA) today called for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) to immediately reject Norwegian Air International’s (NAI) foreign air carrier permit application because the company appears to be attempting to evade its national laws and regulations to compete unfairly against U.S. airlines and their employees. The call came in an answer that ALPA filed in response to NAI’s application.
“Norwegian Air International was clearly designed to attempt to dodge laws and regulations, starting a race to the bottom on labor and working conditions,” said Capt. Lee Moak, ALPA’s president. “If successful, the company would gain a serious and unfair economic advantage over U.S. airlines in the competition for the business of international passengers flying to and from the United States. This exploitation of the laws intended to prevent labor law shopping cannot be allowed to stand.”
While Norwegian citizens control NAI, which is a subsidiary of Norwegian Air Shuttle (NAS), the company uses aircraft registered in Ireland and has applied for an air operator certificate from that country. It appears that its flight crews will work under individual employment contracts that are governed by Singapore law and that have wages and working conditions substantially inferior to those of NAS’s Norway-based pilots.
“If NAS is permitted to pick and choose the countries in which it establishes its subsidiaries and employs its flight crews, U.S. carriers will be put at a severe competitive disadvantage because the United States has one set of laws and regulations for all of its airlines,” said Capt. Moak. “The U.S.-EU air services agreement was never intended to allow this type of scheme, which games the system for competitive economic advantages.”
ALPA maintains that the NAI scheme raises the specter of the “flag of convenience” business practice that undermined the U.S. maritime industry by allowing a vessel to be registered in a country different from its ownership and apply the country of registry’s laws to its operations. The practice precipitated the decline of the industry and the loss of tens of thousands of U.S. maritime jobs as companies flew the flag of countries with the weakest labor and tax laws and regulations.
Moak noted a quote by the AFL-CIO’s Transportation Trades Department in an opinion piece published today by Aviation Daily: “We must reject business models premised on scouring the globe for cheap labor no matter the consequences, and not pretend this is somehow acceptable competitive behavior.”
“The NAI scheme must be immediately and unequivocally rejected,” said Moak. “The DOT must not permit U.S. airlines and their employees to face an unfair competitive disadvantage from this runaway shop and swiftly dismiss NAI’s air carrier permit application.”
Moak also called on the Irish government to reject NAI’s attempt to register the aircraft in Ireland. “Ireland should not allow itself to be complicit in NAI’s avoidance scheme,” he concluded.
Founded in 1931, ALPA is the world’s largest pilot union, representing nearly 50,000 pilots at 32 airlines in the United States and Canada. Visit the ALPA website at www.alpa.org.

#denyNAI | Tell Obama to deny Norwegian Air Shuttle's application to fly into the US

(APA and SWAPA are also in support of this effort, but I was unable to link their press releases here)

tsquare 02-06-2014 09:55 AM

Pretty sure this administration doesn't care. I will betcha that Marco Rubio doesn't.

I signed it btw... painless.

Rolf 02-06-2014 10:18 AM

I hope you are wrong, T (as usual?). Signed, because that's all I can do.

tsquare 02-06-2014 10:19 AM


Originally Posted by Rolf (Post 1575676)
I hope you are wrong, T (as usual?). Signed, because that's all I can do.

abu dhabi ring any bells?

Rolf 02-06-2014 10:21 AM

Mailed my congressman. He thinks it makes the US safer and therefore supports it. Sad.

shoelu 02-06-2014 12:01 PM

I signed. I'm not sure that it will do any good but at least my feelings are known. SWAPA said much the same thing. Here's the SWAPA link you couldn't find.
http://www.airlineinfo.com/ostpdf89/374.pdf

tsquare 02-06-2014 12:12 PM


Originally Posted by Rolf (Post 1575679)
Mailed my congressman. He thinks it makes the US safer and therefore supports it. Sad.

Yeah, so did Rubio. It will be interesting when the first security breach is traced back to there. I am sure they will fall all over themselves wondering what happened. Not to mention the colossal waste of taxpayer money.....

cmesoar 02-06-2014 12:22 PM

I signed. I don't think it's going to anything. This so called president has so many things going wrong. I really don't think he cares about this. Unless this will harm the majority of people that voted for him he will turn his back and then deny any responsibility if it hurts us or makes us less safe.

scambo1 02-06-2014 02:47 PM


Originally Posted by cmesoar (Post 1575783)
I signed. I don't think it's going to anything. This so called president has so many things going wrong. I really don't think he cares about this. Unless this will harm the majority of people that voted for him he will turn his back and then deny any responsibility if it hurts us or makes us less safe.

Well, he can't get re-elected, so if it doesn't reduce foodstamps, he might go along.

shiznit 02-06-2014 05:35 PM


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1575677)
abu dhabi ring any bells?


Originally Posted by Rolf (Post 1575679)
Mailed my congressman. He thinks it makes the US safer and therefore supports it. Sad.


Originally Posted by tsquare (Post 1575768)
Yeah, so did Rubio. It will be interesting when the first security breach is traced back to there. I am sure they will fall all over themselves wondering what happened. Not to mention the colossal waste of taxpayer money.....

Abu Dhabi is a separate but equally important issue.

HR 3488 has 144 co-sponsors already 70+ D's and 60+ R's (since the spending bill passed, that's a lot of names fast in Congressional world).

Expect Senate companion bill soon and a Call to Action accompanying it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:31 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands