Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
The Emirates Advantage… Not just subsidies >

The Emirates Advantage… Not just subsidies

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

The Emirates Advantage… Not just subsidies

Old 04-30-2015, 04:54 AM
  #191  
Line Holder
 
Whip Whitaker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: MD-80 Captain
Posts: 48
Default

Tsk-tsk. Sounds like that report by the Big 3 took some liberties

COMMENTARY: US white paper on Gulf carriers distorts my academic report | Open Skies content from ATWOnline


COMMENTARY: US white paper on Gulf carriers distorts my academic report
Frankie O'Connell Apr 26, 2015
As the author of an academic research paper that was quoted a number of times in a US airline-commissioned 55-page white paper entitled “Restoring open skies: the need to address subsidized competition from state-owned airlines in Qatar and the UAE”, I would like to address a number of issues pertaining to the report.

I feel that my views were inaccurately interpreted and skewed to serve objectives unrelated to my paper. In particular, I wish to stress the following points:

First, the white paper report on page 30 quotes from my report -- “The rise of the Arabian Gulf carriers: an insight into the business model of Emirates Airline, Journal of Air Transport Management”- in support of the alleged subsidization of Emirates Airline and its related managerial practices that “this multifaceted management role…can press the airport to act in the best interests of the country’s flag carrier.”

My academic paper reads directly as follows: “This multifaceted management role allows for cost synergies and pressurizes airports to act in the interests of airlines.” The passage quoted in the academic paper does NOT state the words “can press the airport to act in the best interests of the country’s flag carrier”. The passage in question was referencing the fact that these lower landing charges are passed onto ALL airlines “to act in the interest of airlines”, (which was omitted) and how Emirates Airline and Dubai airport work together to induce synergies.

These entities are separated in the UK, which ultimately adds costs for airlines that land there. This legitimate symbiosis of aviation partnerships in the UAE allows strategic agendas to become fused and seamless; in fact, this entrepreneurial approach has helped attract more than 140 airlines to Dubai. In the UK, the lack of vertical governance between airlines and airports, as well as the significant transaction costs of regulation implemented by the CAA, adds layers of complexity and bureaucracy when attempting to induce forward strategic visions and blueprints for future development.

For 50 years the debate about a third runway at London Heathrow has been plagued by indecisions, prevarications and delays. The UK’s only hub airport operates at 98% capacity, severely restraining the UK from being a global economic power in a tripartite ensemble of trade, financial services and tourism. This myopic political vision is surprising when conceptualizing that there are only six airports in the world that have more than 50 long-haul routes -Heathrow, Dubai and New York JFK among them. British Airways’ stellar approach to this restrictive airport infrastructural dilemma should be commandeered as its open mindset categorizes encroaching competition as another layer of rivalry that needs to be challenged and contested through the mechanisms of effective strategic and marketing management.

Secondly, the duty free facility that can cross-subsidize cheaper landing charges for airlines is a commonplace strategy adopted by airports worldwide. Interestingly, this single-till approach has been formally advocated by the UK Competition Commission, which claimed that a dual-till arrangement (i.e. a break-up of such cross-subsidization policies) could result in “a substantial transfer of income to airports from airlines and/or their passengers, potentially undermining regulatory credibility and creating regulatory uncertainty”.

Airports are becoming more commercially minded as they increase their dependence on non-aeronautical revenue streams such as retail and car parking. This commercial practice is spearheaded by Middle East-based airports as the ACI Airport Economics Survey declares that Middle Eastern based airports derived the highest proportion of their non-aeronautical revenues from retail concessions registering 61.2% in 2012, while US-based airports garnered just 7.7%. Duty free revenues generated $6.24 per passenger at Middle East airports in 2012, the highest in the world, against $0.12 earned per passenger at US airports. This induced revenue stream from the non-aeronautical category of the business assists the Middle East airports in being able to offer lower aeronautical charges for ALL carriers, stimulating increased traffic volumes which cascades into economic prosperity.

Korea’s Incheon airport, for example, derived around 64% of its total airport revenues from non-aeronautical activities in 2012, as reported by CAPA. However, the relationship between the airline and airport stakeholders remains tense due to increased pressure on airports not to raise aeronautical charges – subsequently the aeronautical share of the revenues of the world’s airports have remained relatively constant at between 54%-56% from 2008 to 2012, as illustrated from the ACI Airport Economics reports. The widespread use of airport discounts on aeronautical charges to encourage traffic growth and regional economic prosperity through trade and tourism has put additional pressure on aeronautical revenues with San Francisco International (SFO) for example offering 100% discount on landing fees for up to 24 months for any non-stop international route not currently served from SFO. California’s $2.1 trillion economy would position it as the 9th largest economy in the world on par with the economy of Russia – the airport’s mandate appears clear in that it wishes to substantially grow its international footprint as it has around 54 of the Fortune 500 companies domiciled in the Golden state. The US airports are fortunate as the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) collects $4.50 per enplaned passenger which is used to fund improvement and expansion projects. However it adds around 3% to the average cost of a domestic ticket. The GAO-15-107 states that around $2.8 billion in PFCs were collected in 2013 but from 1990 through to August 2014, FAA approved airports’ requests to collect around $89 billion in PFCs to develop infrastructural projects, which invariably benefit the travelling public, while over one-third goes to serve interest payments on outstanding debt. In addition US airports enjoy tax free bond financing and generally pay no rent for access to the land together with no property tax. There are now calls by the airport trade associations to increase the fee to $8.50. In the spirit of the white paper, should all this be necessarily interpreted as a hidden subsidization policy?

Thirdly, the US white paper on the Gulf carriers addresses issues raised in my research regarding the labor practices of Emirates. Prolonged strikes have crippled the air transport value chain forcing passengers to shift allegiance to competitors and have a devastating impact on sustaining profitability that could be reinvested into capital equipment.

Lufthansa Group’s annual report for 2014 mentions the word ‘strike’ 91 times, while the Air France 14-day pilot strike in 2014 cost the group around €500 million ($ million) as the ripple effects of the strike also negatively impacted forward bookings.

The powerful French pilots’ union disregarded the fact that Air France recorded some of the highest losses in the global airline industry in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in pursuit of their own directive. Although the right to strike in democratic societies should not be questioned per se, the Middle Eastern culture of forbidding strikes ensures smooth flight operations and continuous service. Expatriate employees have the option to secure employment contracts in these lucrative Gulf States or remain in their domiciled country – the choice is entirely theirs.

An Emirates’ dossier published in 2012 states that it provides additional financial compensation totaling over $500 million to its expatriate workforce in the form of accommodation, children’s education and healthcare – a practice which is commonplace in the UAE. The unit labor cost per ASK in Euro cents for the latest financial year for Emirates and Singapore Airlines are very similar. This is significant as both exclusively use widebody aircraft from the duopoly of the world’s large aircraft manufacturers, while the unit labor cost parity indicates that the Gulf incumbent is subjected to the same productivity challenges as its Asian counterpart.

My academic paper discusses how labor intensive tasks such as ground handling and catering are largely performed by workers from the cheap labor markets of the Indian sub-continent. However, these unskilled jobs can only command a low tiered remuneration contract regardless of the country in question. For example, baggage handlers in the US receive an average of $11.92 per hour according to payscale.com. US President Barack Obama’s legislation is calling for the US federal minimum wage to be increased to $10.10 per hour. At this hourly rate, a US worker with a family of four would need government assistance to be taken above the federal poverty line. According to Reuters, only 6.7% of the US private sector workers were unionized in 2013 which leaves these low-skilled employees disadvantaged in such a democratically enshrined society.

For all the above reasons, I believe that the US white paper report makes false claims on the arguments made by my paper. Lobbying in favor of a stakeholder is understandable in pluralistic modern societies. However, doing so by victimizing and blaming the success of others based on inaccurate statements is a practice of very limited added value to the society.

Dr John Frankie O’Connell is a lecturer at Cranfield University in the UK and a member of the Royal Aeronautical Society.
Whip Whitaker is offline  
Old 04-30-2015, 05:10 AM
  #192  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: tri current
Posts: 1,474
Default

Nice find Whip.

Secondly, the duty free facility that can cross-subsidize cheaper landing charges for airlines is a commonplace strategy adopted by airports worldwide. Interestingly, this single-till approach has been formally advocated by the UK Competition Commission, which claimed that a dual-till arrangement (i.e. a break-up of such cross-subsidization policies) could result in “a substantial transfer of income to airports from airlines and/or their passengers, potentially undermining regulatory credibility and creating regulatory uncertainty”.

Airports are becoming more commercially minded as they increase their dependence on non-aeronautical revenue streams such as retail and car parking. This commercial practice is spearheaded by Middle East-based airports as the ACI Airport Economics Survey declares that Middle Eastern based airports derived the highest proportion of their non-aeronautical revenues from retail concessions registering 61.2% in 2012, while US-based airports garnered just 7.7%. Duty free revenues generated $6.24 per passenger at Middle East airports in 2012, the highest in the world, against $0.12 earned per passenger at US airports. This induced revenue stream from the non-aeronautical category of the business assists the Middle East airports in being able to offer lower aeronautical charges for ALL carriers, stimulating increased traffic volumes which cascades into economic prosperity.


As I was transiting Dubai on the way back to the USA the other day I thought about the competitive advantage Emirates has from it's Duty Free alone. It is an awesome facility and the revenue they generate is in excess of $1 billion/year. This is yet another item that U.S. and European carriers fail to adequately consider. Years ago Dubai Duty Free sold a tremendous number of televisions to Indian customers. Yes, televisions. Apparently the duty in India was so high that it made it a great selling item from Duty Free.

It is just these kinds of cultural and economic phenomena that U.S. airlines are categorically failing to recognize and take advantage of. Part of Emirates success is just this. Indian passengers will choose EK over LH, AF, BA, DL, etc because they can transit Dubai and buy a lot of goods to take back to India.




Typhoonpilot
Typhoonpilot is offline  
Old 04-30-2015, 05:54 AM
  #193  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by PILOTGUY View Post
Again, an incorrect lumping. I was there, and relatively new. Nobody asked me for my approval, or my opinion. Nobody I knew (a lot) was asked or told anything. I recall almost breaking an ignorant DL FO when he decided to touch me and accuse me of being part of the problem while we were collecting our gate check bags.

Don't "lump" 1500 pilots because of the actions of a few.


Don't know if I will ever come back stateside, but I DO like the idea of not paying ALPA ever again! Those few were the "special" union members and did nothing to benefit me. Complete waste of money for 8 years.

Good reading on this thread. The schooling and trolling of one particular poster was priceless
My, what retroactive braveness you have. Almost broke that guy, did you?

You're corrupting my words by bringing two unrelated quotes together. I didn't elaborate on what pilots may or may not have been involved in your group petitioning Comair not to hire Delta furloughees. I was simply briniging it up as an example of a pilot group advocating for a particular position on recruitment.

I don't care what people did to passively tolerate, or actively support Lawson, but the indisputable fact is that you elected Lawson, and he was your voice. If it makes you feel better to pretend you personally were the good guy, and someone else was the bad guy, knock yourself out.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 05-06-2015, 02:24 PM
  #194  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: tri current
Posts: 1,474
Default

Click on the May 2015 PDF of Open Sky to see Emirates initial response to the Legacy 3's white paper.

Pretty good reading.



Typhoonpilot
Typhoonpilot is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 07:23 AM
  #195  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot View Post
Click on the May 2015 PDF of Open Sky to see Emirates initial response to the Legacy 3's white paper.

Pretty good reading.



Typhoonpilot
About as good of a source as RT News...
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 09:04 AM
  #196  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: tri current
Posts: 1,474
Default

Originally Posted by intrepidcv11 View Post
About as good of a source as RT News...

Did you read it?

Pretty hard to argue with some of the route diagrams and especially about the strong denial of the fuel hedge issue at Emirates.

So you'll take the U.S. airlines white paper at face value even though it clearly had an agenda, but not the response from one of the competitors?


TP
Typhoonpilot is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 09:25 AM
  #197  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,253
Default

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot View Post
Did you read it?

Pretty hard to argue with some of the route diagrams and especially about the strong denial of the fuel hedge issue at Emirates.

So you'll take the U.S. airlines white paper at face value even though it clearly had an agenda, but not the response from one of the competitors?


TP
Strangely the U.S. paper didn't have to feature a personal note saluting competition from a big important sheik.

Maybe the U.S. big 3 should gift a super special $700 million dividend in addition to all our other taxes to good old Uncle Sam.
intrepidcv11 is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 11:57 AM
  #198  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,064
Default

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot View Post
Click on the May 2015 PDF of Open Sky to see Emirates initial response to the Legacy 3's white paper.

Pretty good reading.



Typhoonpilot
I currently have no dog in this fight, I hope to someday, but that article is condescending and lacking in details. I enjoy your posts because I like reading agreements on both sides of the debate but in this case I don't see how that article supports your side at all. The Restoring Open Skies white paper was incredibly detailed and clearly laid out specific examples of the ME carriers breaching the agreement. Basically the current response from Emirates is just that the white paper is not true. Literally that is their rebuttal, just to say the accusations are not true and print out a couple route maps. This has been building for a long time and that is all they have? That right there to me is pretty incriminating to their case. Surely they have something better than that article? They didn't know this was coming? If they knew ALPA was working on this two years ago what have they been doing for the last two years?
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 12:51 PM
  #199  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,451
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku View Post
I currently have no dog in this fight, I hope to someday, but that article is condescending and lacking in details. I enjoy your posts because I like reading agreements on both sides of the debate but in this case I don't see how that article supports your side at all. The Restoring Open Skies white paper was incredibly detailed and clearly laid out specific examples of the ME carriers breaching the agreement. Basically the current response from Emirates is just that the white paper is not true. Literally that is their rebuttal, just to say the accusations are not true and print out a couple route maps. This has been building for a long time and that is all they have? That right there to me is pretty incriminating to their case. Surely they have something better than that article? They didn't know this was coming? If they knew ALPA was working on this two years ago what have they been doing for the last two years?
Yup, they have something better, and they've been doing it in Washington DC for more than the last two years, it's called,

"Campaign Contributions".
Timbo is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 06:38 PM
  #200  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku View Post
I currently have no dog in this fight, I hope to someday, but that article is condescending and lacking in details. I enjoy your posts because I like reading agreements on both sides of the debate but in this case I don't see how that article supports your side at all. The Restoring Open Skies white paper was incredibly detailed and clearly laid out specific examples of the ME carriers breaching the agreement. Basically the current response from Emirates is just that the white paper is not true. Literally that is their rebuttal, just to say the accusations are not true and print out a couple route maps. This has been building for a long time and that is all they have? That right there to me is pretty incriminating to their case. Surely they have something better than that article? They didn't know this was coming? If they knew ALPA was working on this two years ago what have they been doing for the last two years?
Seems like your analytical skills function perfectly without the rose-colored glasses. Maybe TP could venture out a little from his comfort zone, and try reading with his own eyes?

Or will his passport not be returned?
Sink r8 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dune
Foreign
33
12-14-2011 03:41 PM
vagabond
Foreign
12
11-19-2011 03:43 AM
joel payne
Foreign
48
11-19-2009 04:28 PM
Past V1
Foreign
5
06-16-2008 02:20 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
0
02-21-2007 10:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread