![]() |
Originally Posted by NuGuy
(Post 1864043)
FWIW, at NWA, anytime the sim motion was on (which meant for all full flight sims & checks), a seniority list instructor was required. Seat fill required a seniority list pilot. Any checking event required a SLI.
NWA ran a combined program, and most, but not all, NWA IPs were also checkairmen, and did OE & line checks as well. In practice, there were some IPs who only did OE, and line checks were usually done by the most senior (in program) IPs. It was also not a full time job. It averaged 6 months a year, with 2 months on the line and 2 in the box. You also had to be able to hold your equipment, and if you bid off (or got bumped), you lost your IP gig. NWA did utilize non-seniority Aircrew Training Instructors for ground school and some procedures training. There was a program for them to get hired on the seniority list. Nu I've never understood why DL doesn't harmonize/crosstrain IP and LCA pilots. |
At United, the only non pilot seniority list instructors are the ground school/systems instructors. All sims/flight training devices or line instruction (IOE) are done by seniority list pilots.
And no pilot instructor got hired as an instructor right off the bat. They got hired as line pilots, who then applied to become an instructor in the training center. I believe they need to have 12 months of line flying before they can apply to the training center. Most of the sim instructors are First Officers (legacy CAL had some Captains as instructors so they may still be doing that gig) due to the pay cap that is specified in the contract. Standard Captains and LCA's are paid at their respective rate plus an override for conducting whatever training they are doing. DC |
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 1863888)
If I'm not mistaken, but on the mid 90's contract wasn't that seen as a "give" by letting pilots that weren't CA's be instructors?
It was a long long time ago, and before the interwebz was such an effective tool of information. But it seems as if I remeber that as I was sitting on a dumper by the LGA crewroom at the terminal by the blast fence, and there was all the printed literature about was was given up on that contract and what was wanted back in C 01. But your rant does not answer the OP's question, which is what I was trying to do. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1864328)
That sounds like a great way to do things. Any downsides to it in actual practice? Was it a biddable position or management selected like it is now?
I've never understood why DL doesn't harmonize/crosstrain IP and LCA pilots. To allow more than just a MSP culture in teaching the Instructor was given positive space to and from work and a hotel room. Instructors were all Captains that were line pilots that taught approx 6 months of the year and flew the line the rest of the time...if there was a training crunch like now, we would have worked more. For the 330 fleet there was approx 40-60 instructors that did all of the sim and OE. Like Nu said, only Line Capt instructors did full flight and any checking events. |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1864458)
Um...Yeah.
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1864458)
But your rant does not answer the OP's question, which is what I was trying to do. :rolleyes:
I was simply using your post to pose the question. As well as asked YOU specifically because you seem to be able to remember certain things from a long long time ago about issues like contracts, etc. |
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 1864471)
Well, thanks for answering the question.
Sorry if it came off as a rant, grandpa. Did you yell at the kids to get off your lawn? I was simply using your post to pose the question. As well as asked YOU specifically because you seem to be able to remember certain things from a long long time ago about issues like contracts, etc. Oh, we had real ground schools back then too, with real systems courses taught by mechanics who knew the systems inside and out. Today you get a CD and watch it at home. All those ground school instructors are gone. Same with the Ops Specs group. We had a day long class just on Ops. Specs taught by Mother Malone. Another concession to save the company money. Now...GET OFF MY LAWN!! :D |
I've never understood the fascination with having an instructor be very senior. Some of the worst instructors I've ever had were extremely senior, and some of the best very junior. What matters most is how good they are at teaching, not how long they happen to have been at a particular company. All seniority is good for is determining bid status. It doesn't relate to experience or qualification in any way, and that's by design.
Maybe I'm new age, but I think ability to teach should be the biggest reason to hire someone as an instructor. There are plenty of crusty old captains who are good pilots, but couldn't teach if their lives depended on it. That being said I do think there is value in having the instructor force be line seniority pilots so they can relate to line flying directly. |
Originally Posted by EMBFlyer
(Post 1863993)
That's what I was told by the LUS Check Airman when I was in 767 Initial in November.
circa early 2000's or late 90's |
Originally Posted by diablo
(Post 1864145)
AA will hire military only pilots as Sim P's. I know this because I was offered a job and I have only Military C-130 and B737 instructor experience.
Not true. The 737 had many non mil pilots. 121 line experience helps. Going the Sim P route is not the way to the line though. I was told that right away. |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1864577)
. Well, 30 years ago all the sim instructors were Captains. Everything from that point to today's training ops were concessions made in small bites, in every contract, to 'save money' obviously. My last 777 recurrent training was given to me by a F/O who's seniority number was about 11,000.
Oh, we had real ground schools back then too, with real systems courses taught by mechanics who knew the systems inside and out. Today you get a CD and watch it at home. All those ground school instructors are gone. Same with the Ops Specs group. We had a day long class just on Ops. Specs taught by Mother Malone. Another concession to save the company money.
Originally Posted by Southerner
(Post 1864625)
I've never understood the fascination with having an instructor be very senior. Some of the worst instructors I've ever had were extremely senior, and some of the best very junior. What matters most is how good they are at teaching, not how long they happen to have been at a particular company.
However, viewing through a different set of optics during negotiations, other things come into play. If an instructor has to be able to hold CA, that means he's naturally senior. That means said CA will be offline most of his time. That means MORE CA's are needed to fly the line. IE; more upgrades. Which can shorten the life span of being an FO if so desired. It's not unlike the concept of having monthly credit caps for line pilots. If line pilots are only allowed to credit a certain amount a month and no more, it's means MORE staffing required. As in, MORE jobs. As well as the paycheck that goes along with being a CA in the training center and the pay overrides, etc. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:46 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands