Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   First Quarter Financials (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/87745-first-quarter-financials.html)

Timbo 04-25-2015 01:35 PM

A long time ago we were having a cockpit discussion about Welfare, taxes, voting, and all that good stuff. The F/O came out with a remark that I have always found to be true:

"You get what you subsidize".

Make it free, and they will come. Why would anyone want to stay in school and/or get a job, when you can just sit at home and get 'paid' by the government for a .... disability.

Reminds me of another time, when I was a Freshman in college. Our Economics Professor comes in on day one and tells us,

"The best thing you can be in life, is an Unwed Mother in the stat of Massachusetts!".

He then went on to list all the benefits they got... at his expense.

gettinbumped 04-25-2015 01:50 PM

This conversation makes me laugh.... Good thing we aren't having it in 2001 or 2009!! I remember an acquaintance and FO of mine who was former military and VERY right wing republican. Talked constantly about crappy social programs, freeloaders, etc... very much like this conversation. And then he got furloughed. No flying jobs to be found. I noticed he didn't turn down the unemployment bennies. I also noticed he didn't object when they extended them.

Timbo 04-25-2015 02:13 PM


Originally Posted by gettinbumped (Post 1868657)
This conversation makes me laugh.... Good thing we aren't having it in 2001 or 2009!! I remember an acquaintance and FO of mine who was former military and VERY right wing republican. Talked constantly about crappy social programs, freeloaders, etc... very much like this conversation. And then he got furloughed. No flying jobs to be found. I noticed he didn't turn down the unemployment bennies. I also noticed he didn't object when they extended them.

Hahaha, that reminds me of a friend of mine, hired at AA in 1978, furloughed in 1981 after the ATC strike. He was getting $200/week from the state of Mass and refused to come back to work flying checks at night (with me) for $150/week!

He said, "Why would I take a PAY CUT and have to work my *** off??". :rolleyes:

Well, the company got another check run, and another airplane, so they really needed a couple more pilots, they hired him back as my copilot... at $200/week. I was more than pizzed off, as I was 'the Captain' making $50 less per week!

After a few months of flying checks all night, he left to become a temporary ATC replacement (scab?) worker in the BOS tower, working clearance delivery and ground control, late at night. A few years later he was recalled to American, retired from there not long ago.

Point of this story is, he refused to work for less than he was getting on unemployment.

Mesabah 04-25-2015 03:20 PM


Originally Posted by gettinbumped (Post 1868657)
This conversation makes me laugh.... Good thing we aren't having it in 2001 or 2009!! I remember an acquaintance and FO of mine who was former military and VERY right wing republican. Talked constantly about crappy social programs, freeloaders, etc... very much like this conversation. And then he got furloughed. No flying jobs to be found. I noticed he didn't turn down the unemployment bennies. I also noticed he didn't object when they extended them.

I turned them down when I got furloughed. Companies pay unemployment insurance, that in recent years had to be subsidized by additional taxpayer debt. However, it doesn't change the fact that the income tax you pay is stolen, and wasted. I find it insulting that the government thinks it knows how to spend my money better than I do.

My favorite is anti venom, they buy it for $900 in Mexico, and bill the government $80,000 for it. This is the waste I'm talking about. Taxes would be very small if it was an honest system.

BenderRodriguez 04-25-2015 04:13 PM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1868620)
So in your mind, a negative population growth is something the government would be okay with?

The government ponzi scheme depends upon population growth.

I, however do agree about the drain on society part. The wrong demographics are doing most of the breeding.


Negative population growth in this country is about as likely as finding an honest politician that really wants to do something good for the country. I don't think that the growth to the degree that we are seeing it is necessary.

I agree with your statements 2 and 3.

full of luv 04-25-2015 06:05 PM


Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez (Post 1868728)
Negative population growth in this country is about as likely as finding an honest politician that really wants to do something good for the country. I don't think that the growth to the degree that we are seeing it is necessary.

I agree with your statements 2 and 3.

Y'all need to watch Idiocracy.... it explains it all in painful detail.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icmRCixQrx8

This is the first two minutes to give you the premise.

NERD 04-25-2015 06:52 PM

While we are at it😗. Besides deductions for children, why do we get deductions for houses or churches? Those are choices too.

Timbo 04-25-2015 07:41 PM


Originally Posted by NERD (Post 1868800)
While we are at it��. Besides deductions for children, why do we get deductions for houses or churches? Those are choices too.

And how about all the "Tax Free" institutions, like...

Yale! :eek:

One of the largest private land holders in Connecticut, all tax free!:rolleyes:

F15Cricket 04-25-2015 10:05 PM


Originally Posted by Name User (Post 1868540)
What you'll find is most higher educated, higher earning adults vote Democrat. The Republic base is the lower educated, and poorer areas of our country (just look at the Fox News demographics!). I always laugh when pilots, whom tend to be higher educated and earn more than your average worker (except maybe for the commuter guys) identify with the Republican base.

I think you mean that those who THINK they are higher educated vote Democrat!

You also know the stat that those who are younger, single or married with no kids, and live in cities tend to be more liberal, whereas those who are in their 30s or older, married with children, and don't live in the big cities tend to vote conservative. So, in other words, those who are still self-centered and trying to live for themselves vote one way, and those who are productive members of society tend to vote the other way ...


Originally Posted by gettinbumped (Post 1868657)
This conversation makes me laugh.... Good thing we aren't having it in 2001 or 2009!! I remember an acquaintance and FO of mine who was former military and VERY right wing republican. Talked constantly about crappy social programs, freeloaders, etc... very much like this conversation. And then he got furloughed. No flying jobs to be found. I noticed he didn't turn down the unemployment bennies. I also noticed he didn't object when they extended them.

You do realize it's Unemployment Insurance, right?
So, if you have a car wreck and file a claim on your insurance, how is that different than filing an unemployment insurance claim?
There IS a difference between welfare and unemployment, but you knew that already, right?

clear4approach 04-26-2015 04:42 AM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1868819)
And how about all the "Tax Free" institutions, like...

Yale! :eek:

One of the largest private land holders in Connecticut, all tax free!:rolleyes:

While we're at it, isnt it the NFL or NCAA (or both) that make bazillions of dollars but pay very little taxes?
'Murica


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands