Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
PAX O2 masks for smoke or fumes??? >

PAX O2 masks for smoke or fumes???

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

PAX O2 masks for smoke or fumes???

Old 02-12-2016, 07:26 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
AKpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B-737 Capt
Posts: 153
Default PAX O2 masks for smoke or fumes???

Yesterday a AA Airbus flight diverted to LAX with smoke / fumes in the cabin. The ATC tape played on the news has the pilot saying the they had the O2 masks dropped in the pax cabin. I have heard of other similar situations recently. I called my UA airbus captain friend and asked if there was a procedure for deploying masks for smoke or fumes. He said there is no procedure. There is none for the B-737 that I fly. I had a simulator scenario one year that addressed this very issue. PAX O2 masks are for decompression ONLY. The masks are not designed for smoke mitigation. Any thoughts on this? Are there any airlines that have a procedure to deploy PAX O2 masks outside of a decompression event? AA guys?
AKpilot is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 07:47 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Babysitter
Posts: 975
Default

Originally Posted by AKpilot View Post
Yesterday a AA Airbus flight diverted to LAX with smoke / fumes in the cabin. The ATC tape played on the news has the pilot saying the they had the O2 masks dropped in the pax cabin. I have heard of other similar situations recently. I called my UA airbus captain friend and asked if there was a procedure for deploying masks for smoke or fumes. He said there is no procedure. There is none for the B-737 that I fly. I had a simulator scenario one year that addressed this very issue. PAX O2 masks are for decompression ONLY. The masks are not designed for smoke mitigation. Any thoughts on this? Are there any airlines that have a procedure to deploy PAX O2 masks outside of a decompression event? AA guys?

The masks are for cabin depressurization. Now can they provide some assistance during smoke/fumes? Well that's up to the big man in the left seat. I guess I don't see the harm in giving them something, though I don't think that was the original intent based on the FCOM. Just my 2 cents...Though I believe the intent is to get rid of the smoke/fumes. I don't see any PAX OX deploy in the QRH for any smoke/fumes....so it obviously would be outside of procedure to do that.

Last edited by WARich; 02-12-2016 at 07:58 AM.
WARich is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 07:51 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 174
Default

Maybe they depressurized the airplane as part of a smoke removal procedure.
encore is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 07:55 AM
  #4  
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
RockyBoy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,598
Default

Originally Posted by WARich View Post
The masks are for cabin depressurization. Now can they provide some assistance during smoke/fumes? Well that's up to the big man in the left seat. I guess I don't see the harm in giving them something, though I don't think that was the original intent based on the FCOM. Just my 2 cents...
Other than the fact that if you do have an actual cabin fire you are now pumping pure oxygen into the cabin. Not sure if I would want to be providing an excellent fuel source to fan the fire.
RockyBoy is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 08:02 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Babysitter
Posts: 975
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy View Post
Other than the fact that if you do have an actual cabin fire you are now pumping pure oxygen into the cabin. Not sure if I would want to be providing an excellent fuel source to fan the fire.
LOL...Actually there is a note that says not to deploy them if fire is suspected.....
WARich is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 08:03 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
AKpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B-737 Capt
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by encore View Post
Maybe they depressurized the airplane as part of a smoke removal procedure.
Our smoke evac check list procedure says set cabin alt to 10,000 ft. No masks needed for that.

I'm not trying to be critical of the pilot. I just try to learn something every day. I want to do it right if it happens to me. If Boeing or Airbus thought it was a good idea they would put it in the procedure.
AKpilot is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 08:05 AM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 784
Default

This is becoming a huge problem for Airbus. More than likely an organophosphate scenario. It needs to be fixed soon. Just a guess but I'd bet a beer on it
ovrtake92 is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 08:11 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: JAFO- First Observer
Posts: 997
Default

Basic systems knowledge and understanding. Those "dixie cups" don't deliver 100% oxygen to each passenger. Also, they don't "seal" to the face like crew masks do. If the pax don the masks in a cabin smoke situation, they WILL be inhaling a combination of smoke, recirculated cabin air and some oxygen.

Bottom line, it may be a moral conundrum for the PIC, but deploying pax oxygen in a smoke situation may actually be contrary to the QRH.
PerfInit is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 08:15 AM
  #9  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

We were taxiing-in when this occurred. Wondered what was up.

Finally crossed 25R, and counted 19 emergency vehicles around an American Bus (it was on Bravo). Then, it taxiied to the gate.

Nothing was said by ATC before or after.
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Old 02-12-2016, 08:17 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2012
Position: Babysitter
Posts: 975
Default

Originally Posted by PerfInit View Post
Basic systems knowledge and understanding. Those "dixie cups" don't deliver 100% oxygen to each passenger. Also, they don't "seal" to the face like crew masks do. If the pax don the masks in a cabin smoke situation, they WILL be inhaling a combination of smoke, recirculated cabin air and some oxygen.

Bottom line, it may be a moral conundrum for the PIC, but deploying pax oxygen in a smoke situation may actually be contrary to the QRH.

I agree with the not-so tight fit of the mask, but the oxygen generators are supplying pure oxygen.
WARich is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AKpilot
Major
7
07-28-2015 07:12 AM
CFI Guy
Part 135
37
04-04-2014 07:23 PM
palgia841
Major
9
12-07-2007 07:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices