US urged by EU to give Norwegian the all clea
03-02-2016, 06:35 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
I would think a "free trade," free market, anti-regulation, Republican administration would be more likely to approve this type of deal than a pro-labor, protectionist, anti-free trade Democrat administration.
We LOL'd.
Sincerely,
NAFTA (Clinton)
Trans-Pacific Partnership (Obama)
03-02-2016, 06:56 AM
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 468
Originally Posted by jcountry
How is it not going to be political?
Hint: Politicians have us all by the balls and can either stop this or make it happen.
-Welcome to the planet.
Hint: Politicians have us all by the balls and can either stop this or make it happen.
-Welcome to the planet.
The poster of that subsequently went on to provide some great thoughts about the subject to which I agreed.
03-02-2016, 07:00 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,166
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
I would think a "free trade," free market, anti-regulation, Republican administration would be more likely to approve this type of deal than a pro-labor, protectionist, anti-free trade Democrat administration. All other things being equal, and on a purely philosophical level.
03-02-2016, 07:09 AM
#15
Banned
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: 7th green
Posts: 4,378
Originally Posted by full of luv
Admittedly, though I only know the headline details of each attempt to fly into the US by NA. That's why I give to the PAC and answer the calls to action. They have the details.
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
I would think a "free trade," free market, anti-regulation, Republican administration would be more likely to approve this type of deal than a pro-labor, protectionist, anti-free trade Democrat administration. All other things being equal, and on a purely philosophical level.
Originally Posted by jcountry
Obama is anything but pro-labor...... Unless you screw on lug nuts as part of UAW, you don't count for ****.
Originally Posted by SayAlt
NAFTA (Clinton)
Trans-Pacific Partnership (Obama)
Trans-Pacific Partnership (Obama)
03-02-2016, 07:16 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted by Packrat
Both programs that originated in Republican dominated Administrations.
Interestingly, and undercutting your point entirely, both democrat administrations took great credit for both programs.
Originally Posted by Packrat
Again, as always, let's blame the President for everything from Gitmo (Cause: Mr. Bush's War) to a snowy day.
03-02-2016, 07:21 AM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
And people call them "socialists."
All I'm doing is pointing out how ridiculous your previous contention was/is.
Go drink some more kool-aid.
03-02-2016, 07:22 AM
#18
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 81
http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uplo.../09/SSUS-4.jpg
Stop the arguing. Concentrate.
This is your future if you let "flag of convenience" stand.
Stop the arguing. Concentrate.
This is your future if you let "flag of convenience" stand.
03-02-2016, 07:43 AM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,808
Originally Posted by SayAlt
Go drink some more kool-aid.
03-02-2016, 08:32 AM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Posts: 1,537
Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Okay. So witty. But if Obama is a socialist, why would he push so hard for a free-trade deal that Wall Street supports and labor is against?
I lol'd.
Debating with...much less attempting to inform...one such as you is a pointless exercise and thorough waste of time.
Go drink your kool-aid and keep pretending you know what you don't know.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
