Originally Posted by Florida Flyer
(Post 317248)
I think Freezing's point was that it's better to be a senior captain at ABC regional than a furloughed legacy FO at Delta or NWA. I certainly hope that nobody gets the big F word, but in these times of merger/consolidation uncertainty, being at the bottom of the totem pole at a major might just be your ticket to some very unwanted "time off" after a merger. |
You guys need to think long term if you're thinking about staying at your regional and "seeing what happens". What may happen over the next few years is you will go from having 6 possible employers to work at to three. Meanwhile your buddies that took a chance dealt with the uncertainty and will eventually get enough seniority to where they don't worry much about losing their jobs, and they'll be working the largest airlines in the world with many options in front of them. Remember, this career is a marathon and not a sprint.
If hiring stops and it takes 3-5 years to happen again, you'll be that much further along in life with more responsibilities and it'll be tougher to make the jump. The feeders will see their share of turmoil out of this, so don't think you'll be sitting on the sidelines watching idly. Some of these smaller cities that are currently fed by RJs from competing carriers will consolidate and redistribute the routes to larger equipment. 50-seat RJ flying is going to be squeezed. Anyway, nobody can ever promise you that you won't be furloughed and speaking as someone that was furloughed for 3 years I can say there are worse things that can happen to you. Good luck to us all! |
Originally Posted by Flare Armed
(Post 317350)
You guys need to think long term if you're thinking about staying at your regional and "seeing what happens". What may happen over the next few years is you will go from having 6 possible employers to work at to three. Meanwhile your buddies that took a chance dealt with the uncertainty and will eventually get enough seniority to where they don't worry much about losing their jobs, and they'll be working the largest airlines in the world with many options in front of them. Remember, this career is a marathon and not a sprint.
If hiring stops and it takes 3-5 years to happen again, you'll be that much further along in life with more responsibilities and it'll be tougher to make the jump. The feeders will see their share of turmoil out of this, so don't think you'll be sitting on the sidelines watching idly. Some of these smaller cities that are currently fed by RJs from competing carriers will consolidate and redistribute the routes to larger equipment. 50-seat RJ flying is going to be squeezed. Anyway, nobody can ever promise you that you won't be furloughed and speaking as someone that was furloughed for 3 years I can say there are worse things that can happen to you. Good luck to us all! Everyones situation is different and in the end we all just need to do whats best for ourselves and families. Its all a gamble, figure risk vs reward;). |
Not to mention the fact the Majors call all the shots. At some point I expect the number of RJ's at the regionals to reduce significantly. Delta is already alluding to this based on $100/barrel oil. If you believe what some analysts are saying most "regional jets" (less than 100 seats) will be gone in the next ten years due to economics.
|
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 317448)
Not to mention the fact the Majors call all the shots. At some point I expect the number of RJ's at the regionals to reduce significantly. Delta is already alluding to this based on $100/barrel oil. If you believe what some analysts are saying most "regional jets" (less than 100 seats) will be gone in the next ten years due to economics.
|
or one certain fractional....
|
The shift from the regionals back to the majors will be driven by re-fleeting in 2012 to 2015 with the Pratt GTF and aircraft that best employ its' technology.
Today's regional Captains can be Captains, or First Officers, on that equipment. The difference is paying your dues now, or later. There will always be a 50 seat regional jet, just like there will always be a Beech 1900 and a 767 sized jet. Each of these aircraft has a market. The market allocation will change in response to economic factors. In the short term I think the RJ market is fine due to the very large number of RJ's being ordered in the 70 to 90 seat range. Bombardier's been increasing production, but no one has noticed! The "common knowledge" that the RJ is dead in this NWA/DAL merger is flat out wrong. In fact, as I see the stars beginning to align the DC-9 and some MD88's are much more likely to be getting parked. I don't like it and I'm not advocating it. Just calling it as it appears to be coming down. |
Scope
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 317448)
Not to mention the fact the Majors call all the shots. At some point I expect the number of RJ's at the regionals to reduce significantly. Delta is already alluding to this based on $100/barrel oil. If you believe what some analysts are saying most "regional jets" (less than 100 seats) will be gone in the next ten years due to economics.
JMHO |
The RJ issue will be market driven, the issue of who will fly them and how much those that do will make will be determined at the table.
The issue of RJ's and how big regional airlines will be is predicated on scope clauses at major carriers. APLA's whole strategy with regard to mergers is to gain leverage to regain lost pay and work rules. CEO's at the potentailly mergering airlines have conceded a willingness to cooperate to buy labor peace. If ALPA is sucessful in strengthing scope across the board, the regional flying will shift to the majors. The opposite is true if ALPA fails to strengthen scope. Pretty simple. |
Originally Posted by Deez340
(Post 317183)
Uh, no. Delta will not be losing gates in ATL. Maybe, the two NW gates on D, but those will most likely stay as well. What record did he go on?
Delta-Northwest would benefit AirTran, exec says By RUSSELL GRANTHAM The Atlanta Journal-Constitution Published on: 01/30/08 AirTran Airways' chief executive says a merger between rivals Delta and Northwest would bring his carrier growth opportunities. AirTran would likely seek more gates at the Atlanta airport and additional operating rights at key airports in New York and Washington, D.C., Chief Executive Bob Fornaro said Tuesday. In comments after AirTran released its quarterly financial results, Fornaro said Delta and Northwest — said to be in merger talks — would likely reduce flights and close one or more hubs, as well as shed assets to make the deal palatable to federal regulators. The prospect of such a merger remained the backdrop Tuesday as AirTran, JetBlue and Northwest reported fourth-quarter losses caused partly by near-record jet fuel bills. Delta also initiated merger talks with United Airlines, but they no longer appear to be active, people familiar with the matter have said. AirTran posted a $2.2 million loss for the final three months of 2007 as a 35 percent jump in fuel costs overwhelmed increased revenues from rising traffic and fares. Northwest, which remained mum about its merger plans, reported a net loss of $8 million in the quarter. Orlando-based AirTran's loss was narrower than a year earlier, and the airline still posted a full- year 2007 profit of $52.7 million. In 2006, AirTran reported net profit of $14.7 million for the full year and a $3.6 million loss in the fourth quarter. Some politicians are already voicing opposition to a merger involving two carriers as big as Delta and Northwest, saying such a deal could spark broader consolidation and would harm consumers. AirTran's Fornaro, however, said a Delta-Northwest marriage could free up a handful of gates at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson airport now controlled by Northwest. AirTran is Delta's top competitor in Atlanta and has long coveted more gates. "We would try to make the case that we should get those gates," Fornaro said in an interview. Likewise, he said AirTran would be interested in acquiring landing and takeoff slots that could become available at New York's LaGuardia Airport and Washington's Reagan National — airports favored by lucrative business travelers. Even though a merged Delta and Northwest could be the world's largest airline as measured by traffic, Fornaro said the combination would benefit AirTran more than hurt it. "Carriers like AirTran that are efficient and nimble can really capitalize on this situation," said Fornaro, who succeeded Joe Leonard as CEO in November. Leonard, still chairman, plans to retire in May. Also Tuesday, AirTran rolled out more expansion plans for Milwaukee, the home of Midwest Airlines, which it tried unsuccessfully to buy last year. The move signals that AirTran is building its own flight schedule in the wake of the failed buyout. AirTran plans to start seasonal flights in May between Milwaukee and Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco, San Diego, and Boston, plus additional nonstop flights to Las Vegas. The carrier earlier announced plans for Milwaukee-New York flights. AirTran operates or has announced plans for 20 daily flights from Milwaukee, and Fornaro said that number will grow to 50 in the next few years. AirTran dropped its plans to buy Midwest when private equity firm Texas Pacific Group teamed up with Northwest Airlines to buy Midwest. The Department of Justice is doing an extended review of the buyout, but executives at both AirTran and Northwest said Tuesday that they expect approval soon. So, it looks like the ATL gates AirTran would have access to in the short term are the ones being used by Northwest. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:05 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands