Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Delta to stand alone?

Old 02-26-2008, 07:27 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 330Fo
Posts: 215
Default

I guess the real question must be asked will both pilot groups, thus both airlines, be better off in the long run if they combine into one? I don't know. I know if NWA stays alone, as a 12 year 330FO I am going to be moving up the list in the next 5-7 years significantly assuming, that Boeing can produce the 787, where the DAL list is going to be quite stagnant for some time. But will either NWA or DAL, as a separate enity, have the pricing power to price their product with respect to costs?
Opus is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 07:36 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 128
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
Bullsh!!t

I have been at DAL 11 years, and we don't have ANY "twelve year" pilots...the last group hired in the early 90s was Jan 92. The next group hired after that (after some years of stagnation and furlough) was October 96. I was fortunate enough to be hired right at the end of 96.

I can not hold 767 captain of any sort anywhere. (Perhaps LAX just from the last bid, but if so it is a very recent novelty).

I could be a VERY junior captain on the 737-800 in NYC, or the absolute plug in ATL, and nowhere else.

I could hold a regular line as MD88 captain in most MD88 bases.

I can just now hold a junior regular line on the 777, and pretty good ones on any other equipment.

Hey, I got hired at a pretty good time, and I'm not complaining about my seniority--it isn't too bad.

But this idea that "12 years at DAL gets you a line as an ER captain" is complete BS from the first syllable to the last.
To add to Herk's comments I made captain at 14 years. It could of been earlier but it would have been miserable with a young family etc.

I'm at 18 years now and a junior reserve ER captain. I'm in this position way out of seniority because many pilots aren't willing to put up with reserve and NYC.

I'm not complaining. I'm glad to be here and am fortunate that things have turned out as they have (so far). The mass exodus of senior Delta pilots due to impending bankruptcy and the ability to take a 50% lump sum with our loss of the DB plan ( I know we got something for the loss but I wasn't made whole) caused this movement and now I'm supposed to give this to someone else who at least got their DB plan hard frozen.
sully606 is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 07:44 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

How bout' DOH with an 18 year fence around ATL, LAX, NYC, SLC, and CVG.
Deez340 is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 07:53 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
Bullsh!!t

I have been at DAL 11 years, and we don't have ANY "twelve year" pilots...the last group hired in the early 90s was Jan 92. The next group hired after that (after some years of stagnation and furlough) was October 96. I was fortunate enough to be hired right at the end of 96.

I can not hold 767 captain of any sort anywhere. (Perhaps LAX just from the last bid, but if so it is a very recent novelty).

I could be a VERY junior captain on the 737-800 in NYC, or the absolute plug in ATL, and nowhere else.

I could hold a regular line as MD88 captain in most MD88 bases.

I can just now hold a junior regular line on the 777, and pretty good ones on any other equipment.

Hey, I got hired at a pretty good time, and I'm not complaining about my seniority--it isn't too bad.

But this idea that "12 years at DAL gets you a line as an ER captain" is complete BS from the first syllable to the last.
Herc,

If what you say is true then maybe we are not so far apart.

The NWA 90's hiring began in 1995.
Those 95 hires can hold:
DC-9 Capt in all bases
320 CA in DTW and MSP
747-400 FO reserve (very close to block)

'96 hires can hold the same except for 320 CA in DTW (its more senior)

Thanks for your honesty.

I've spent my time here at NWA watching the aftermath of a merger that happened 22 years ago.

From what I heard ,they were fistfighting even with a list that was merged straight DOH (those fences were long and high for the green guys).

We should make sure this gets done right.

Good luck to us all.
newKnow is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 07:57 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 330Fo
Posts: 215
Default

How bout' DOH with an 18 year fence around ATL, LAX, NYC, SLC, and CVG.

And for the NWA guys, DTW, MSP, MEM, ANC and of course the aircraft we have and have coming. So, if the 747-400/200 787, 330 go to ATL/NYC we can bid our seniority also, then I would take that in a heart beat, DOH with such fences.

Remember, our arguement is that while DAL just had their attrition we are about to have ours and we have a whole bunch of widebody flying with 68 787s hitting the property along with what we already have. So, if you want to fence your flying/aircraft, no worries sign us up.
Opus is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 07:59 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 330Fo
Posts: 215
Default

How bout' DOH with an 18 year fence around ATL, LAX, NYC, SLC, and CVG.

And for the NWA guys, DTW, MSP, MEM, ANC and of course the aircraft we have and have coming. So, if the 747-400/200 787, 330 go to ATL/NYC we can bid our seniority also, then I would take that in a heart beat, DOH with such fences.

Remember, our arguement is that while DAL just had their attrition we are about to have ours and we have a whole bunch of widebody flying with 68 787s hitting the property along with what we already have. So, if you want to fence your flying/aircraft, no worries sign us up.[/quote]
Opus is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 08:30 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dtfl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Work
Posts: 506
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude View Post
More negotiating in the press... standard anderson/steenland act. One of the first tenants is "establish random deadlines." Then there's "blame the greedy pilots", and "appeal to greedy senior guys to convince them to sell out the junior guys."

If the merger was good for the company last week, it will still be good for the company next week, and the week after. All this press is designed to force the NWA guys to cave on seniority. I'd rather not merge than accept a ridiculous seniority list.

Personally, I don't see how we'll ever come up with a list that both sides can agree on.
Curious - why would you assume your MEC would be "caving?" Rumors on the DAL say DALs MEC approached the NWA MEC with a list that would keep everyone's seniority at +/- 0.5%. I dont understand how such an agreement would be caving.
dtfl is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 08:33 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

Originally Posted by sully606 View Post
To add to Herk's comments I made captain at 14 years. It could of been earlier but it would have been miserable with a young family etc.

I'm at 18 years now and a junior reserve ER captain. I'm in this position way out of seniority because many pilots aren't willing to put up with reserve and NYC.

I'm not complaining. I'm glad to be here and am fortunate that things have turned out as they have (so far). The mass exodus of senior Delta pilots due to impending bankruptcy and the ability to take a 50% lump sum with our loss of the DB plan ( I know we got something for the loss but I wasn't made whole) caused this movement and now I'm supposed to give this to someone else who at least got their DB plan hard frozen.
Sully,

Looks like our '89 hires can hold 757 Capt. Which I have posted on other forums is not the typical 757 job (Europe, Asia, Hawaii)

In my opinion, not too far off there either. The difference between our bottom 757 Captain and the last 1990 hire is a little over 300 numbers.
newKnow is offline  
Old 02-26-2008, 08:34 PM
  #29  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr View Post
But this idea that "12 years at DAL gets you a line as an ER captain" is complete BS from the first syllable to the last.
That's what happens when you believe everything you hear on the line. I stand corrected. You are right. I looked at the numbers from the projected category list and a 01/97 hire date gets you plug in LAX on the 76 domestic. It also gets you 73N in ATL and 11/97 gets you 73N in NYC. The most junior captain is M88 in NYC with a 7/00 date.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 02-27-2008, 03:27 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
nwaf16dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 737A
Posts: 1,890
Default

Originally Posted by dtfl View Post
Curious - why would you assume your MEC would be "caving?" Rumors on the DAL say DALs MEC approached the NWA MEC with a list that would keep everyone's seniority at +/- 0.5%. I dont understand how such an agreement would be caving.
I don't have any details about the agreements being proposed. I'm just looking at the items that have been leaked to the press. Most of what I've read blames the NWA pilots for delaying the merger, therefore, it seems like the leaks are designed to put pressure on the NWA pilots. DAL guys might not be used to this, but NWA guys have been getting this kind of treatment from our management for a long time, so we recognize the intent of the press leaks pretty quickly. The people in MSP writing these articles are very connected to NWA managment. I don't think they do any independent research, they just regurgitate whatever their NWA contacts tell them. Then the wire services pick up the story and take it national and suddenly it's the gospel truth.

The leaks are already creating dissention among the employees. Flight attendants are yelling at pilots for "holding up the deal." Senior pilots are touting the monetary improvements in the contract in an effort to sell the deal without the seniority integration piece. They know they are safe anyway and just want the extra money.

Your relative seniority proposal sounds okay to me as long as it doesn't put any post 9/11 hires in front of any pre 9/11 hires. That might not be completely rational, but it's a deal breaker for me.

Last edited by nwaf16dude; 02-27-2008 at 03:32 AM. Reason: content
nwaf16dude is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spinproof
Major
13
04-19-2006 07:06 AM
Sir James
Major
1
01-05-2006 07:59 PM
Sir James
Major
0
10-16-2005 09:14 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM
Sir James
Major
0
04-13-2005 10:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices