Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
NWA ALPA's Take on the Merger >

NWA ALPA's Take on the Merger

Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

NWA ALPA's Take on the Merger

Old 04-18-2008, 07:07 PM
  #181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
oooooooh did you think that up yourself? naaaaah I doubt it. LOL
dang it, you figured me out. it was my mom. she fights my battles. on a serious note you need to put your glasses on and take a look at it. all I can think of is an old cheer from the movie wildcats. it goes like this...U-G-L-Y you ain't got no alibi...you ugly... heah-heah...you ugly LOL
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 07:20 PM
  #182  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Excellent question. I would be willing to relax our scope to allow DAL wide bodies to continue flying their international routes and capture revenue. This may actually be required if the Japanese refuse to grant 5th freedom rights transfer to Delta. In that case our merger agreement would have to be amended to make NWA the acquiring carrier. It would take that arguement away from the Japanese. And in return, I would want a pay raise. And if I were the MEC chairman, I would demand any actual funds received be put into escrow for distribution to ALL pilots when all hurdles are cleared.

Carl
You don't think it's possible that the combined brain power of DAL and NWA managements already firgured out how the 5th freedom rights would work with Delta being the surviving carrier? Or that the Japanese would balk at any change? This is a political/economic arena and having lived in Asia for most of my life, seriously doubt that the Japanese would really care what the carrier is called, so long as service isn't disrupted or that they get something in return.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 07:24 PM
  #183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob View Post
OK, so since you want a piece of what Delta gave me to amend my contract with them, what are you willing to give me from your contract? This is a rather simplistic approach, but it does convey the essence of the argument. It's about quid pro quo. Delta needed something from me. They were willing to pay for it. I traded scope concessions. You want some of that pay. What are you willing to do or trade for it? Or do you want to demand that some of it belongs to you without any shared changes on your part?
since the scope was loosened to allow nwa to fly their wide bodies does it allow them to fly additional wide bodies that could come on property after the merger date if their isn't a SLI or are they locked into only those airplanes on property?
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 07:33 PM
  #184  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton View Post
since the scope was loosened to allow nwa to fly their wide bodies does it allow them to fly additional wide bodies that could come on property after the merger date if their isn't a SLI or are they locked into only those airplanes on property?
Well let's see, how to decide where to put any new WBs. There are the 777s. I guess NW could get them, but why not put them with the carrier who already operates them. Maybe pick up some A330s. Spool up a whole new category at Delta or just put them where you already have trained pilots to fly them. 767-300s. How many does NW operate. Great deal on some used 747-400s. It's getting confusing, who operates those already?

You seem to be quibbling now. Maybe we can get the NW pilots even more ticked off by making them have to start wearing hats after the merge.
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 07:49 PM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob View Post
Well let's see, how to decide where to put any new WBs. There are the 777s. I guess NW could get them, but why not put them with the carrier who already operates them. Maybe pick up some A330s. Spool up a whole new category at Delta or just put them where you already have trained pilots to fly them. 767-300s. How many does NW operate. Great deal on some used 747-400s. It's getting confusing, who operates those already?

You seem to be quibbling now. Maybe we can get the NW pilots even more ticked off by making them have to start wearing hats after the merge.
hey there's that sarcasm guy again...I think we both know that the nwa guys aren't going to wear the hat unless they are the ones that currently wear it.

I'm not trying to get anyone worked up I'm just trying to see things from all angles and what could possibly happen. can whipsawing happen? whether people believe it would happen or not isn't the point. it's whether is can or cannot happen. I think to the past when people were led to believe that 50 seaters were only going to replace props and grow markets for bigger airplanes. we all know how that turned out.
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:27 PM
  #186  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,865
Default

[quote=Eric Stratton;368234]
I've just never seen a pilot group come across as being so right all the time while the other side is so wrong ...

Eric,
Your kidding right? You have just exactly described the position of every merging pilot group ever. This crap has been going on ever since Orville and Wilbur merged from Orville and Wilbur into the Wright brothers.
Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 04:30 AM
  #187  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 57
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton View Post
hey there's that sarcasm guy again...I think we both know that the nwa guys aren't going to wear the hat unless they are the ones that currently wear it.

I'm not trying to get anyone worked up I'm just trying to see things from all angles and what could possibly happen. can whipsawing happen? whether people believe it would happen or not isn't the point. it's whether is can or cannot happen. I think to the past when people were led to believe that 50 seaters were only going to replace props and grow markets for bigger airplanes. we all know how that turned out.

why don't you check out a thread called "Correcting NWA MEC's little lies". don't know who this guy is but he seems to have some interesting info. if his info is correct nwa rank and file better beware from within.
flyguy1012 is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 05:53 AM
  #188  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Yikes....yet another Delta professional describing an attempt to discern facts as an emotionally driven spasm of some sort. Do you feel no need whatsoever to actually comprehend the points discussed?

Carl
That was not my intent at all Carl, but I think you just verified that your reaction to the deal is emotional...

My point was that this is business. We are trying to negotiate a better contract for all (and that INCLUDES NWA pilots), and this is the first step. And ONLY that... the first step. The DAL pilots had a unique leverage position here and Moak exploited it which will benefit us all when the whole thing is done. It took a long time for me to come to that realization, as well as the realization that all those types of negotiating tactics used in the past won't work anymore; at least to the extent that we can extract gains from our companies. I personally am sick of the adversarial relationships between labor and management. Everybody loses... So why not try something different? I guess if that makes me a kiool-aid drinker, then make mine orange. But maybe the old ways are right. Maybe we should threaten to burn it down. And then management will essentially impose a crap contract on us.. and some third rate government bureaucrat will impose an SLI on us and everybody will be unhappy. I guess that will be much better.
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 07:01 AM
  #189  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

[QUOTE=Scoop;368307]
Originally Posted by Eric Stratton View Post
I've just never seen a pilot group come across as being so right all the time while the other side is so wrong ...

Eric,
Your kidding right? You have just exactly described the position of every merging pilot group ever. This crap has been going on ever since Orville and Wilbur merged from Orville and Wilbur into the Wright brothers.
Scoop
is it really a surprise that a SLI wasn't going to get done in a few weeks with out a mediator (I was told there wasn't one) or having arbitration done. both sides are going to guard seniority with their life because it's the only constant in this industry. unless you merge of course.
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 04-19-2008, 09:46 AM
  #190  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

[quote=Eric Stratton;368482]
Originally Posted by Scoop View Post

is it really a surprise that a SLI wasn't going to get done in a few weeks with out a mediator (I was told there wasn't one) or having arbitration done. both sides are going to guard seniority with their life because it's the only constant in this industry. unless you merge of course.

Eric... do us all a favor, and define seniority as you see it. this is not a dig at you, but it is really a way to ask if you really underdstand what the word means as it relates to two different groups.
tsquare is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zoomie
Mergers and Acquisitions
6
02-26-2008 01:03 PM
mike734
Major
15
09-17-2007 12:03 PM
LDmax
Major
0
01-28-2006 12:57 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
01-07-2006 03:24 PM
RockBottom
Major
1
08-12-2005 03:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices