Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
Why DAL's proposed ratio is inequitable >

Why DAL's proposed ratio is inequitable

Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Why DAL's proposed ratio is inequitable

Old 05-30-2008, 06:45 PM
  #481  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flare Armed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B767 First Officer
Posts: 160
Default

I've been gone awhile flying and on vacation...this thread is STILL ALIVE? Jeesh!
Flare Armed is offline  
Old 06-04-2008, 10:14 AM
  #482  
Line Holder
 
NoSoupForYou's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL 7ER F/O
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
At NWA, if I make it until 60, I retire as #9. With a one for one ratio with DAL pilots who are younger than me, the best I could hope for is retiring at #509.
Carl-

You make a fine point, but I don't want you to think things are all roses even on the Delta-only list. My current Delta projected system seniority in year 2020 when I turn 60 (when, by the way, I will have 30 years with Delta) is around number 1,800. You read that right- and that's a Delta-only number- nothing to do with the merger or NWA. 60 years old, 30 years with Delta, and around number 1,800. Chalk it up to getting hired at the wrong time, but it is what it is.

My point? Simply to say that many of us DAL types are feeling pretty vulnerable too.

Soup
NoSoupForYou is offline  
Old 06-05-2008, 03:55 PM
  #483  
Back on TDY
Thread Starter
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by NoSoupForYou View Post
Carl-

You make a fine point, but I don't want you to think things are all roses even on the Delta-only list. My current Delta projected system seniority in year 2020 when I turn 60 (when, by the way, I will have 30 years with Delta) is around number 1,800. You read that right- and that's a Delta-only number- nothing to do with the merger or NWA. 60 years old, 30 years with Delta, and around number 1,800. Chalk it up to getting hired at the wrong time, but it is what it is.

My point? Simply to say that many of us DAL types are feeling pretty vulnerable too.

Soup
I sure undestand that. Anybody in our crazy industry probably feels vulnerable right now.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 03:30 AM
  #484  
Back on TDY
Thread Starter
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Well, these latest developments are pretty neat. My biggest concern was that DALPA would use LOA 19 as a hammer and delay any joint contract until many NWA folks had been furloughed.

We started this latest process excruciatingly slow, and it looked like stalling was going to be the tactic. I don't know what caused the urgency from DAL management to work around the clock until an agreement was reached, but the bottom line is: we did reach it. I'm very proud of DALPA and NWALPA for getting this done.

Pretty strong rumors seem to indicate that Date of Hire is off the table, the ratio that figured in Delta's future aircraft options is also off the table, and a framework has us pretty close to agreement on an SLI. Could it be that we will actually agree on an SLI without arbitration? That would be absolutely historic. What an incredible start to the new Delta that would be.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 03:47 AM
  #485  
Gets Weekends Off
 
StripAlert's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Against
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Well, these latest developments are pretty neat. My biggest concern was that DALPA would use LOA 19 as a hammer and delay any joint contract until many NWA folks had been furloughed.
Fortunately, for you guys, our union has a pretty good record of never actually using any leverage we might happen upon... But you'll understand, won't you, if I don't share in your enthusiasm for me sharing in your furloughs?

Last edited by StripAlert; 06-26-2008 at 04:06 AM.
StripAlert is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 06:21 AM
  #486  
Back on TDY
Thread Starter
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by StripAlert View Post
Fortunately, for you guys, our union has a pretty good record of never actually using any leverage we might happen upon... But you'll understand, won't you, if I don't share in your enthusiasm for me sharing in your furloughs?
You shouldn't and won't share in any NWA furloughs as long as we're two separate companies. We won't share in any DAL furloughs as long as we're two separate companies. If that were the case, then I would definitely understand your lack of enthusiasm.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 08:56 AM
  #487  
Gets Weekends Off
 
StripAlert's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: Against
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
You shouldn't and won't share in any NWA furloughs as long as we're two separate companies. We won't share in any DAL furloughs as long as we're two separate companies. If that were the case, then I would definitely understand your lack of enthusiasm.
I agree, and that's the best reason not to rush into a JPWA and SLI until the slow season. Then we won't have to argue about whose furloughs were whose.
StripAlert is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 09:09 AM
  #488  
Back on TDY
Thread Starter
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by StripAlert View Post
I agree, and that's the best reason not to rush into a JPWA and SLI until the slow season. Then we won't have to argue about whose furloughs were whose.
I'm with you Strip, but the JPWA got done - at least the TA is done. That train has departed the station. It would be interesting to know why DAL management wanted this rushed. It definitely raised my eyebrows when I heard DAL management asked for "round the clock" negotiations until a TA is completed. The SLI could happen any time as well - I've stopped trying to predict anything here. Too many surprises.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 10:23 AM
  #489  
Looking for a laugh
 
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Default

My take is without the JCBA and SLI, the company cannot or will not move the flying around. With these two in place, they can move the categories around from DCC. I wouldn't be suprised to find the 747s operating out of ATL ASAP. Of course, intergration has to wait for SOC, but could they concievably put the new categories out for bid, but keep you in your old category until SOC, possibly pay protected?
Justdoinmyjob is offline  
Old 06-26-2008, 10:57 AM
  #490  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: DAL 7ER FO
Posts: 98
Default

Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob View Post
My take is without the JCBA and SLI, the company cannot or will not move the flying around. With these two in place, they can move the categories around from DCC. I wouldn't be suprised to find the 747s operating out of ATL ASAP. Of course, intergration has to wait for SOC, but could they concievably put the new categories out for bid, but keep you in your old category until SOC, possibly pay protected?
That's the thing I've been wondering about myself. I assume they will want to move some planes around ASAP. If, for example, they want some 400's in ATL, would they displace former NWA DTW 400 pilots to ATL. Or, I suppose they could theoretically start each 400 trip with a deadhead from DTW to ATL as a temporary measure until they get the single operating certificate. I'll be curious to see how it all works out.
PropNWA is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices