Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
A newspaper's summation of DAL/NWA >

A newspaper's summation of DAL/NWA

Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

A newspaper's summation of DAL/NWA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2008, 05:43 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
I'll try one last time with you and then I'm done. Please read slowly...You say DALPA has no authority to renegotiate OUR contract. I've never said they did. What I HAVE said is that DALPA already DID negotiate on our BEHALF when DALPA negotiated an LOA that has a scope change that DIRECTLY affects NWA's ability to continue flying wide bodies on international routes. DALPA also DID negotiate pay rates for NWA aircraft when they signed LOA 19. Get it..it's not that hard.

Now here's the point: It's not that DALPA has any authority to renegotiate our contract. My point is: Since DALPA negotiated an LOA that directly affects NWA pilots, renegotiate THAT LOA to provide for shared furloughs and escrowed pay raises.

I don't know how to explain it any clearer. You'll either see another side to this or you won't.

Carl

Carl,

Here's the disagreement as I see it.

1)The scope language that was changed would affect any carrier that DAL merged with, not just NWA.

2)The pay rates for the 747, 330 etc. were generic aircraft, not NWA aircraft specifically.

Of course in reality these changes were designed to accommidate this particular merger, but they are still changes to the DAL contract and only the DAL contract.

Getting NW guys pay raises or equity or furlough protection would require changes to your contract. Explain to me the wording of a LOA that would give these things to the other pilot group before they are operating as one. If it were to say that NW can't furlough guys after the merger then the current NWA management would have to sign off on it now. And right now, DAPA can't negotiate with them.
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 05:46 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Well, I actually think your Chairman meant what he said. At this point I believe you're reading something else into what he said. If not, then he is some kind of Clintonesque "it depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. Right now I choose to believe his printed words.
Carl
So, you're saying that the day the merger closes, we are all one pilot group under one contract with one seniority list no matter if the two MECs have hammered anything out or not.

Who's contract?

Who's version of the SLI?
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 05:48 PM
  #33  
Back on TDY
Thread Starter
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Jay5150 View Post
Carl,

Here's the disagreement as I see it.

1)The scope language that was changed would affect any carrier that DAL merged with, not just NWA.

2)The pay rates for the 747, 330 etc. were generic aircraft, not NWA aircraft specifically.

Of course in reality these changes were designed to accommidate this particular merger, but they are still changes to the DAL contract and only the DAL contract.

Getting NW guys pay raises or equity or furlough protection would require changes to your contract. Explain to me the wording of a LOA that would give these things to the other pilot group before they are operating as one. If it were to say that NW can't furlough guys after the merger then the current NWA management would have to sign off on it now. And right now, DAPA can't negotiate with them.
I'm out of ideas. You can't explain something to someone who refuses to see it. Deep down inside I know the average Delta guy knows this smells to high heaven. I think the DALPA Chairman knows it too.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 05:49 PM
  #34  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 39
Default Caddyshack

Carl, i was able to negotiate LOA 9999, for ONLY nwa pilots. we will now experience TOTAL CONSCIOUSNESS on Jan 1 2009 (the dal pilots can keep their first pay raise). so now we have that going for us, which is nice.....you can buy me a beer in camp narita this summer for it..... also, the best news yet!!! i secured in our intense and sometimes heated negotiations your immediate promotion to head greens-keeper, with a 9.5 % equity stake in the country club for every year it is gopher-free. Beat that.
nwa757dtw is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 05:49 PM
  #35  
Back on TDY
Thread Starter
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Jay5150 View Post
So, you're saying that the day the merger closes, we are all one pilot group under one contract with one seniority list no matter if the two MECs have hammered anything out or not.

Who's contract?

Who's version of the SLI?
I didn't say anything, I just pasted what Lee Moak put in print.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 05:50 PM
  #36  
Back on TDY
Thread Starter
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by nwa757dtw View Post
Carl, i was able to negotiate LOA 9999, for ONLY nwa pilots. we will now experience TOTAL CONSCIOUSNESS on Jan 1 2009 (the dal pilots can keep their first pay raise). so now we have that going for us, which is nice.....you can buy me a beer in camp narita this summer for it..... also, the best news yet!!! i secured in our intense and sometimes heated negotiations your immediate promotion to head greens-keeper, with a 9.5 % equity stake in the country club for every year it is gopher-free. Beat that.
Not even the Lama himself could beat that!
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 06:03 PM
  #37  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
The LOA 19 already DID have a bearing on NWA. Your scope changes allow our wide bodies to fly internationally. Without the scope changes we would have to PARK wide bodies from Northwest Airlines because of an LOA signed by Delta Airlines and DALPA. I'm not asking for you to negotiate a new LOA, I'm asking to amend the one you ALREADY signed. You know, the one that DIRECTLY affects NWA. And why would NWA have to sign off on it, they didn't sign off on LOA 19 did they?

Carl
Soooooooo.... you would rather we would have left the language as it was... which would have required the parking of the NWA (or at least a good portion of it) international flying, so...... why again? Because as numerous folks have said, this merger is going to happen, as Steenland requested of DAL management... "without the pilots (sic) participation". Where do you think that would have left management's options? You can bet there would have been some NWA flying pulled down in order to facilitate the deal. But I could be wrong. If you meant something else, pleeeeeease enlighten me. because for the life of me I do not understand where you are coming from...
tsquare is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 06:12 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Talking

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Your scope changes allow our wide bodies to fly internationally. Without the scope changes we would have to PARK wide bodies from Northwest Airlines because of an LOA signed by Delta Airlines and DALPA.
Come on, Carl. We let you fly your wide bodies. What more do you want? Very big TIC
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 06:19 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Jay5150's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: 330 FO
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
I didn't say anything, I just pasted what Lee Moak put in print.

Carl
OK, you're right. I give.

If you are right, and we are all one group under one contract the day the merger goes through, then LOA 19 is yours as well. You get the pay bump, the equity stake and furlough protection the day we merge.

Sorry for being so thick headed...

I'm goin' to watch Top Chef
Jay5150 is offline  
Old 04-23-2008, 06:23 PM
  #40  
Back on TDY
Thread Starter
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
Soooooooo.... you would rather we would have left the language as it was... which would have required the parking of the NWA (or at least a good portion of it) international flying, so...... why again?
At least you're admitting that the Delta LOA drastically changed flight operations at NWA. So much for "DALPA doesn't have any authority to negotiate anything at NWA....." And of course I would not want to see our wide bodies parked, they are the only money makers right now - offsetting losses on the domestic side. If Delta hadn't pushed for that change, the new Delta would have to declare bankruptcy on its first day after the merger closes. The losses to the new Delta would be enormous if wide bodies were parked. Therein lies my point. DALPA negotiated an LOA with a change that directly affects NWA aircraft and at the same time prevents enormous losses at the new Delta. Absolutely a good move. The problem is: only DALPA got anything in return. Even worse, DALPA negotiated a no furlough clause just for Delta pilots. It's as if DALPA didn't think we had any value or relevance at all to the LOA and its scope changes. To most NWA pilots, that is an unbelievable slap in the face. And that is why some folks are so angry, they truly do not want any part of the Delta pilot group. Some of those folks are in NWALPA leadership. I know you guys have the same inside DALPA.

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
Because as numerous folks have said, this merger is going to happen, as Steenland requested of DAL management... "without the pilots (sic) participation". Where do you think that would have left management's options? You can bet there would have been some NWA flying pulled down in order to facilitate the deal. But I could be wrong. If you meant something else, pleeeeeease enlighten me. because for the life of me I do not understand where you are coming from...
Numerous folks could very well be wrong. The CEO of Southwest Airlines today said he has grave concerns for both NWA and DAL. He says he would not even contemplate a merger at this time given the cash outlay that will be required up front just to join the two companies. He feels the timing is ill advised. Wall Street appears to agree. Both our stocks are plummeting. This deal is far from over. Some would say, it hasn't even begun.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Marty MCfly
Regional
72
04-16-2008 07:44 AM
DeadHead
Mergers and Acquisitions
52
04-13-2008 04:15 PM
joel payne
Mergers and Acquisitions
13
04-12-2008 06:24 AM
coop77
Mergers and Acquisitions
8
03-15-2008 01:28 PM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
13
03-06-2008 02:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices