Hearing Transcripts
#31
They took it down. It was not to be posted. It is a exhibit in the arbitration and was not mean for public release.
The reason you are seeing that is, Ratio, by EQUIPMENT. Now we will see if the arbitrator agrees with it. NWA may do such a good job with their presentation that we may be DOH, and then all of that DAL guys will loose 4-8%. I myself will maintain what I have under this proposal, and DOH has me loose well over 8%.
The reason you are seeing that is, Ratio, by EQUIPMENT. Now we will see if the arbitrator agrees with it. NWA may do such a good job with their presentation that we may be DOH, and then all of that DAL guys will loose 4-8%. I myself will maintain what I have under this proposal, and DOH has me loose well over 8%.
#32
I guess my point is that I keep hearing DAL wants relative seniority but that is not what was presented...... My hope is we get something that all can be "relatively" happy with.
Last edited by NWA320pilot; 10-07-2008 at 10:08 AM.
#36
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330 capt
Posts: 236
Yes, that's probably right. My point is, ratioing in such a broad category is what gives the DAL guys the 1 to 4% advantage right from the jump and it only gets worse until you get to the bottom where it's only NWA guys.
A ratio of just 777 and 747, then A330 and 767, then narrow bodies would have resulted in closer relative seniority results. Instead it's about a 1.5% NWA disadvantage near the top and 5% plus NWA disadvantage near the bottom. Given that we are both strong airlines with NWA having a higher market cap and higher earnings, I don't see how this systemic DAL advantage from top to bottom will ultimately be justified.
Carl
A ratio of just 777 and 747, then A330 and 767, then narrow bodies would have resulted in closer relative seniority results. Instead it's about a 1.5% NWA disadvantage near the top and 5% plus NWA disadvantage near the bottom. Given that we are both strong airlines with NWA having a higher market cap and higher earnings, I don't see how this systemic DAL advantage from top to bottom will ultimately be justified.
Carl
#38
Exactly. It is taking all positions and the scope of those positions in to account. Depending on where in the proposal you look it is like you post above. 1 to 2. or 1 to 1. You can tell that there was a great deal of time taken putting this together.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: LAX 350 A
Posts: 564
acl65pilot: what's the skinny on the AE. Is it going to be mostly 777 stuff in ATL?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post