NWA fence proposal
#101
[quote=Scoop;488780]
OK Scoop, since you started the thread hijack, my favorite Yogi line was in regard to his favorite restaurant in New York. When asked about it by a sports reporter he said: "Oh nobody goes there anymore...it's too crowded.
Carl
Carl
#102
Carl - the question dodger.
#103
I believe there are a few concepts considered by arbitrators that "trump" any "future expectations" formulation...the most obvious priority concept being summed up as: "preserving current seniority". Your proposal doesn't even come close... the fences attempt to preserve DL's current seniority "rights" for 10 yrs.
Credit for future allocations ain't gonna happen in my opinion. Chairman Bloch's "roulette wheel" comment ended the concept of crediting anyone's future options. It may have ended credit for future firm orders as well.
Carl
#104
Carl
#105
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Carl, I have a lot of friends at NWA. They paint a different picture then you do. One thing you have to remember is that the Delta contract rewards being senior in category. I can hold a line as a 777 Captain at either base as a 86 hire. I have not bid it because I want to be in the top 1/3. Since your fence does not exclude future 777's I will not reach that point ever in my career under the NWA list. As has happened at NW with the fence those that cross the fence via new deliveries or forced displacement will all be senior. I am told that your 747-400 list has mostly green book pilots in the top 1/3. I should be in the top 1/3 in NYC in the next bid and should be there in Atlanta within 2 years. I don't just want my current position protected I want my future advancement protected. Its very difficult to construct fences that accomplish that. In addition if there is going to be a fence because of the NWA retirement the fence should also reflect the Delta retirements. That means a 15 to 20 year fence. That really hammers your junior guys as your MEC found out when they made a SLI proposal without doing their homework. The most critical thing however about the NWA fence is it does not include the 7ER category which like it or not will make up half the international flying at the new company.
#106
Carl, I have a lot of friends at NWA. They paint a different picture then you do. One thing you have to remember is that the Delta contract rewards being senior in category. I can hold a line as a 777 Captain at either base as a 86 hire. I have not bid it because I want to be in the top 1/3. Since your fence does not exclude future 777's I will not reach that point ever in my career under the NWA list.
Carl
#107
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Carl, The problem with the 777 issue is that what is a new order. Delta because they are Boeings largest customer got a excellent deal on the 777's. They have 45 delivery positions through 2014. These positions are not firm orders however are not a traditional option either. 18 months prior to each positions delivery date Delta can affirm or cancel the order. Very flexible and until Americans 787 order last week unique in the industry. It is those future 777's that will allow me to fly as a senior 777 CA in Atlanta. That will not happen with a DOH list under the NWA list. In fact if I bid the aircraft now I would go backward as more aircraft were added until at some point I would end up on reserve. You state that additional 777's would be shared. That is not what would happen virtually every 777 seat awarded after the 2 aircraft in 1Q10 would go to NWA. There would be no sharing. I do allow and agree that the Delta list does not address the higher retirements at NWA. I don't think however going from 9% on my current list to 22% on the new list is fair. Hopefully the arbitrators will see it the same.
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 330Fo
Posts: 215
sailingfun,
But is it fair for a NWA 96 hire to go behind a DAL 2000 hire? Under your proposal I would go from a 330 FO back to either an 319/320 FO or 73 fo. And even though I would end in the top 100 at NWA I would never crack the top 1500 under the DAL lists. So, the word 'fair' can be used by many.
But is it fair for a NWA 96 hire to go behind a DAL 2000 hire? Under your proposal I would go from a 330 FO back to either an 319/320 FO or 73 fo. And even though I would end in the top 100 at NWA I would never crack the top 1500 under the DAL lists. So, the word 'fair' can be used by many.
#109
Carl, The problem with the 777 issue is that what is a new order. Delta because they are Boeings largest customer got a excellent deal on the 777's. They have 45 delivery positions through 2014. These positions are not firm orders however are not a traditional option either. 18 months prior to each positions delivery date Delta can affirm or cancel the order. Very flexible and until Americans 787 order last week unique in the industry. It is those future 777's that will allow me to fly as a senior 777 CA in Atlanta. That will not happen with a DOH list under the NWA list.
Carl
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Well Carl with the NWA list and restrictions there is one thing that is certain. Virtually every widebody seat after the 2 777's in 1Q10 would go only to NWA pilots for many years to come. I would call that a big windfall.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post