Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Mergers and Acquisitions
My humble opinion on a merged UAL/CAL list >

My humble opinion on a merged UAL/CAL list

Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

My humble opinion on a merged UAL/CAL list

Old 04-30-2010, 07:58 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Default

Originally Posted by Airhoss View Post
I wasn't referring to employee happiness but simply a viable airline business model can't run effectivly without willing employees.
I see your point, but you simply have to look at Jonathan Ornstein and Doug Parker (and Frank Lorenzo) to see that the link between "willing" employees and good, functional airlines, is often broken. If a company's short-term prospects were directly lnked to the "willingness" of employees, CAL would have failed twice over, UAL, DAL, and NW wouldn't exist, and UsAir would never have morphed into what it is today.

At a minimum, it takes years before everyone can clearly see the connection between a demoralized employee group and a failing company. Especially since there are enough demoralized employees in the industry, indeed the whole country, which makes the crummy airline simply blend in with the scenery.

By the time anyone figures they've gone too far, for too long, the original CEO is long retired, and the employees are broke.
Sink r8 is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 08:05 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by Flyguppy View Post
For CAL pilots.....the chance for many more primo widebody seats. (Again....not counting fences and all) I read somewhere that UAL has about 4 times more wide bodies than CAL, with more than double the amount on order
True comment. UAL currently has 113 wide bodies while CAL has 46. Looking forward at "firm" orders for each - CAL has 25 787's and 5 777's in its future while UAL has 25 787's and 25 A350's in its. I don't know of any options for CAL while UAL has an additional 50 787's and an additional 50 A350's booked as options. If the future holds a LCC/AWA type list integration - then expect the number of wide bodies to control how the top the the lists are integrated.
skypest is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 08:20 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
David Watts's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 FO
Posts: 255
Default

Originally Posted by skypest View Post
True comment. UAL currently has 113 wide bodies while CAL has 46. Looking forward at "firm" orders for each - CAL has 25 787's and 5 777's in its future while UAL has 25 787's and 25 A350's in its. I don't know of any options for CAL while UAL has an additional 50 787's and an additional 50 A350's booked as options. If the future holds a LCC/AWA type list integration - then expect the number of wide bodies to control how the top the the lists are integrated.
CAL has 25 options for the 787. CAL starts getting 777 this year and 787 next year, if Boeing gets it built.

When do UAL firm orders start arriving? Are they replacing older wide body aircraft with them, like the 747 and maybe some older 767?

Look for the Airbus orders to probably get cancelled if this merger happens.
David Watts is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 11:14 AM
  #14  
Ben Salley
 
A320fumes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Left
Posts: 924
Default

Originally Posted by David Watts View Post
CAL has 25 options for the 787. CAL starts getting 777 this year and 787 next year, if Boeing gets it built.

When do UAL firm orders start arriving? Are they replacing older wide body aircraft with them, like the 747 and maybe some older 767?
2016 at earliest
A320fumes is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 11:52 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

Originally Posted by A320fumes View Post
2016 at earliest
Does the delivery schedule factor for anything or is it just numbers in the pipeline? I really don't know.....

L
Lambourne is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 11:58 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne View Post
Does the delivery schedule factor for anything or is it just numbers in the pipeline? I really don't know....
To my limited knowledge - orders don't count for squat. The only thing that is considered is what actually exists on the ramp when things go down.

Perhaps orders could be looked at in regards to "career expectations". I don't know.
skypest is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 12:35 PM
  #17  
Ben Salley
 
A320fumes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Left
Posts: 924
Default

Originally Posted by skypest View Post
To my limited knowledge - orders don't count for squat. The only thing that is considered is what actually exists on the ramp when things go down.

Perhaps orders could be looked at in regards to "career expectations". I don't know.
"Career Expectations" also = "squat". It's been 11 years since my new-hire class @ USAirways. I didn't expect to be placed 2,000 numbers jr to an 2005 hire or to make Captain @ CAL in less than 3 years. "Career-Expectations" can kiss my arse!
A320fumes is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 03:10 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
REAL Pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 225
Default

[quote=skypest;804131]True comment. UAL currently has 113 wide bodies while CAL has 46......


Thanks for all the numbers. Why didn't you count UAL's 97 757's as widebodies? Why/why not?

Thanks

Carpe Diem
REAL Pilot is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 03:20 PM
  #19  
APC co-founder
 
HSLD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B777
Posts: 5,853
Default

Originally Posted by REAL Pilot View Post
Thanks for all the numbers. Why didn't you count UAL's 97 757's as widebodies? Why/why not?

Thanks

Carpe Diem
Take a look at CAL's page on the APC site, you'll see that the 757's are considered large narrow-bodies, middle in the 3-tier pay structure.

WIDE = 777, 767-400, 767-200
LN = 757-200, 757-300, 737-800/-900
SN = 737-700/-500/-300

Like the 777/747, 757/767, and 320/737 fleets at UA, CAL also has blended rates. They're not based on a specific airframe, but instead, they are based on a gauge classification. So, at CAL, a 757 is not a wide body.
HSLD is offline  
Old 04-30-2010, 07:50 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by REAL Pilot View Post
Why didn't you count UAL's 97 757's as widebodies? Why/why not?
I guess another way of looking at it (and I think many would agree) - If the aircraft has two aisle's it is a Wide body. Thus a single aisle is a narrow body.
skypest is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coopspeed
Regional
57
01-15-2010 01:54 PM
RiddleEagle18
Regional
54
02-25-2009 07:44 AM
maddogmax
Mergers and Acquisitions
96
10-23-2008 06:53 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices