SWA's past merger policy and SLI policy.
#3
Well, look at major mergers since deregulation and maybe it'll jog some merger memories:
AMR: purchased Air California, Reno Air, TWA
America West: acquired US Airways
Continental Airlines: Texas Internatinoal, Frontier, People Express,
New York Air, United Airlines
Delta Air Lines: Western, some of Pan Am, Northwest Airlines.
Pan Am: National Airlines
Northwest Airlines: Republic Airlines
Ozark: Purchased by TWA
Pan Am: National
Republic Airlines: Combined North Central Airlines and Southern, bought out Hughes Airwest
Skywest: Acquired ASA and XJT
TWA: Purchased Ozark
Southwest: Acquired Muse Air, Morris Air and certain assets of ATA
US AIrways: Purchased Pacific Southwest Airlines, Piedmont
AMR: purchased Air California, Reno Air, TWA
America West: acquired US Airways
Continental Airlines: Texas Internatinoal, Frontier, People Express,
New York Air, United Airlines
Delta Air Lines: Western, some of Pan Am, Northwest Airlines.
Pan Am: National Airlines
Northwest Airlines: Republic Airlines
Ozark: Purchased by TWA
Pan Am: National
Republic Airlines: Combined North Central Airlines and Southern, bought out Hughes Airwest
Skywest: Acquired ASA and XJT
TWA: Purchased Ozark
Southwest: Acquired Muse Air, Morris Air and certain assets of ATA
US AIrways: Purchased Pacific Southwest Airlines, Piedmont
#5
Yes! Muse, Morris pilots were not represented by a Union Contract. ATA was but they never merged.
AirTran is represented by a contract and a Union.
I do no know what AirTran"s Scope Successorship clause is,
But I suspect this will be far from any staple Job and most likely it will go to Arbitration.
AirTran is represented by a contract and a Union.
I do no know what AirTran"s Scope Successorship clause is,
But I suspect this will be far from any staple Job and most likely it will go to Arbitration.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
I do no know what AirTran"s Scope Successorship clause is,
But I suspect this will be far from any staple Job and most likely it will go to Arbitration.
But I suspect this will be far from any staple Job and most likely it will go to Arbitration.
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Since they are two different unions the new law will apply. They will meet and negotiate. If they reach an agreement on a SLI its done. If the reach an impasse it goes to binding arbitration. Nothing complicated or complex in the process.
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
Frontier had a union. Didn't stop those SWA guys from trying to pull a major staple job on them now did it? I'm guessing that after that fiasco Gary didn't let his fly boys try to negotiate another merger/buyout.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
The SWA pilots were given veto authority on the merger if they could not reach a prenup with the Frontier pilots. That is not the case in this merger. SWA can propose anything they want. The Airtran pilots can refuse and it goes to arbitration. Much like Delta and NWA where Richard promised that no merger would happen without a prenup that DALPA was happy with management changed their mind. Normally you call it lying but in the corporate world there is seems to be no such thing.
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,709
The SWA pilots were given veto authority on the merger if they could not reach a prenup with the Frontier pilots.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post