Mesa Chap 11 Filling
#101
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
There is always another possibility that another regional could buy mesa with an agreement in place with delta, united, and US Airways. Skywest could agree to buy mesa and end this lawsuit with delta to secure more flying as well as get a foot in the door at airways.
SkyWest has been waiting for this day, and is quite ready to act. Of course, of the planes Mesa has, I suspect only the -900's will continue operating. Republic has their hands full, so I don't expect a lot of competition.
This will make SkyWest a real monster. Not sure if that's good or bad.
This will make SkyWest a real monster. Not sure if that's good or bad.
A third airline to put on their holding company.
Nothing since for USairways at least the number of large RJ's are in violation of the contract. USAPA will win easily if these RJ's are then given away yet again to violate the contract even more.....But the question comes down will USAPA sit and allow CRJ900's to be given away yet again and violate the current contract with the number of large RJ's....
I wouldn't exclude anything from the realm of possibility. I certainly think the pilots would fare as well as can be considering the circumstances. For example, when DAL filed suit to get out of the Freedom flying, XJT was currently doing DAL flying out of LAX and with the slight possibility that XJT might end up with some of that Freedom flying, some MEC members were already on board with giving those MAG pilots seniority and longevity on the XJT seniority list while doing that flying.
They'll buy their assets and that's about it unfortunately for the pilots. Like Tony said, you may get preferential interviews...probably after the UAL and ASA furloughs and the SKW pool pilots.
#102
If go! isn't included in bankruptcy protection, then it isn't protected from seizure by creditors.
If JO wanted to keep go! as a part of MAG, he should have included it in the Ch11 filing.
I fly planes for a living so I could be very wrong about this.
#103
No, this won't be a third airline.... it will be a purchase of assets. Whatever flying done for UAL, USA, or DAL, if any, will be through SkW.
There won't be any parts to identify as Mesa, any more than there are parts of Sun Aire that SkW bought many moons ago.
SkW, I believe, did get approval for a two week training course to make Mesa pilots who are previously rated on same equipment to be SkW pilots.
The turn around can be very, very fast. Might take longer to paint the planes.
#104
Maybe in JO's dreams.... the bankruptcy court will tell Mesa what is "included".
#105
Huh? BK starts the moment an entity files its petition with the court.
MESA IS BANKRUPT.
Whether they are reorganized or liquidated is now up to a court, not JO.
#106
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
No, this won't be a third airline.... it will be a purchase of assets. Whatever flying done for UAL, USA, or DAL, if any, will be through SkW.
There won't be any parts to identify as Mesa, any more than there are parts of Sun Aire that SkW bought many moons ago.
SkW, I believe, did get approval for a two week training course to make Mesa pilots who are previously rated on same equipment to be SkW pilots.
The turn around can be very, very fast. Might take longer to paint the planes.
There won't be any parts to identify as Mesa, any more than there are parts of Sun Aire that SkW bought many moons ago.
SkW, I believe, did get approval for a two week training course to make Mesa pilots who are previously rated on same equipment to be SkW pilots.
The turn around can be very, very fast. Might take longer to paint the planes.
But why Skywest and not ASA?
#107
There may be some advantage with scope... I have no idea. But I very seriously doubt that Mesa brand will be on anything SkW does. Even if there was some small advantage in one or more areas.
As to SkW vs ASA, I'm referring to SkW, Inc. I have no idea if there are plans to grow the ASA brand, or not.
EDIT: SkW Airlines has the reduced training agreement, not ASA. So, that part of my discussion was about OO.
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
3rd UPDATE: Mesa Air Files For Bankruptcy, Plans To Cut Jets
Looks like everything is peachy in PHX, they plan on getting out of BK within a few months. Again why is no one mentioning the fact that the majors have the option to get rid of Mesa? I guess they think it won't happen? And they keep saying Mesa is owed 70 million from DAL. Strange.
Looks like everything is peachy in PHX, they plan on getting out of BK within a few months. Again why is no one mentioning the fact that the majors have the option to get rid of Mesa? I guess they think it won't happen? And they keep saying Mesa is owed 70 million from DAL. Strange.
#109
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
There may be some advantage with scope... I have no idea. But I very seriously doubt that Mesa brand will be on anything SkW does. Even if there was some small advantage in one or more areas.
As to SkW vs ASA, I'm referring to SkW, Inc. I have no idea if there are plans to grow the ASA brand, or not.
EDIT: SkW Airlines has the reduced training agreement, not ASA. So, that part of my discussion was about OO.
As to SkW vs ASA, I'm referring to SkW, Inc. I have no idea if there are plans to grow the ASA brand, or not.
EDIT: SkW Airlines has the reduced training agreement, not ASA. So, that part of my discussion was about OO.
And yeah, I figured that Skywest Airlines got this training approval from the FAA and was hoping for an explanation as to why it wasn't ASA instead?
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Maybe I've missed it, but what about Delta scope? 76 seats last time I checked. I might be wrong, but aren't the Mesa CRJ900s at 86 seats? How could Skywest or any other Delta Connection carrier fly those airplanes without jeopardizing their codeshare?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post