Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa Chap 11 Filling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2010, 03:09 PM
  #101  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by newarkblows View Post
There is always another possibility that another regional could buy mesa with an agreement in place with delta, united, and US Airways. Skywest could agree to buy mesa and end this lawsuit with delta to secure more flying as well as get a foot in the door at airways.
This is what Skywest wanted to do with XJT, get their foot in the door with CAL. The difference is that USAirways is no CAL. If this does happen, I doubt they will be as nice to the MAG pilots as they were to the XJT pilots.

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
SkyWest has been waiting for this day, and is quite ready to act. Of course, of the planes Mesa has, I suspect only the -900's will continue operating. Republic has their hands full, so I don't expect a lot of competition.

This will make SkyWest a real monster. Not sure if that's good or bad.
It could be a good thing but I highly doubt SKW management will structure it in a way in which it would be, judging from past practice.

Originally Posted by PSACFI View Post
So speculation time: What does Skywest stand to gain from this?
A third airline to put on their holding company.

Originally Posted by meyers9163 View Post
Nothing since for USairways at least the number of large RJ's are in violation of the contract. USAPA will win easily if these RJ's are then given away yet again to violate the contract even more.....But the question comes down will USAPA sit and allow CRJ900's to be given away yet again and violate the current contract with the number of large RJ's....
Lets hope USAPA can win this battle.

Originally Posted by Trip7 View Post
Don't forget Skywest Inc. They have been watching this flying for over a year...
Like vultures?

Originally Posted by Slaphappy View Post
XJT can barely pay their own bills, if anyone is Skywest coming in.
I wouldn't exclude anything from the realm of possibility. I certainly think the pilots would fare as well as can be considering the circumstances. For example, when DAL filed suit to get out of the Freedom flying, XJT was currently doing DAL flying out of LAX and with the slight possibility that XJT might end up with some of that Freedom flying, some MEC members were already on board with giving those MAG pilots seniority and longevity on the XJT seniority list while doing that flying.

Originally Posted by Drums4life View Post
please please please please SkyWest buy us! please!
They'll buy their assets and that's about it unfortunately for the pilots. Like Tony said, you may get preferential interviews...probably after the UAL and ASA furloughs and the SKW pool pilots.
Nevets is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 03:21 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,511
Default

Originally Posted by nordo View Post
I'm curious how they got the Go! operation exempted from the filing.
Originally Posted by H46Bubba View Post
It isn't included. Has something to do with the JV. I think it's being operated as a subsidiary. Comair could have remained out of bankruptcy, but Delta wanted to bring it in so they could reorganize labor contracts and renegotiate aircraft leases and vendor contracts.
From what I've heard, Delta dragged Comair into shamkruptcy so the creditors couldn't confiscate (the still profitable) Comair as payment.

If go! isn't included in bankruptcy protection, then it isn't protected from seizure by creditors.

If JO wanted to keep go! as a part of MAG, he should have included it in the Ch11 filing.

I fly planes for a living so I could be very wrong about this.
Boomer is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 03:25 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post

A third airline to put on their holding company.

No, this won't be a third airline.... it will be a purchase of assets. Whatever flying done for UAL, USA, or DAL, if any, will be through SkW.

There won't be any parts to identify as Mesa, any more than there are parts of Sun Aire that SkW bought many moons ago.

SkW, I believe, did get approval for a two week training course to make Mesa pilots who are previously rated on same equipment to be SkW pilots.

The turn around can be very, very fast. Might take longer to paint the planes.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 03:32 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by H46Bubba View Post
It isn't included. Has something to do with the JV. I think it's being operated as a subsidiary. Comair could have remained out of bankruptcy, but Delta wanted to bring it in so they could reorganize labor contracts and renegotiate aircraft leases and vendor contracts.

Maybe in JO's dreams.... the bankruptcy court will tell Mesa what is "included".
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 03:37 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by boilerpilot View Post
.
To be fair, the agreements say if they file bankruptsy. It may or not mean bankruptsy protection. After all, MAG isn't actually bankrupt yet.

Huh? BK starts the moment an entity files its petition with the court.

MESA IS BANKRUPT.

Whether they are reorganized or liquidated is now up to a court, not JO.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 03:52 PM
  #106  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
No, this won't be a third airline.... it will be a purchase of assets. Whatever flying done for UAL, USA, or DAL, if any, will be through SkW.

There won't be any parts to identify as Mesa, any more than there are parts of Sun Aire that SkW bought many moons ago.

SkW, I believe, did get approval for a two week training course to make Mesa pilots who are previously rated on same equipment to be SkW pilots.

The turn around can be very, very fast. Might take longer to paint the planes.
Yeah, I wasn't sure if a separate certificate was required because of scope issues.

But why Skywest and not ASA?
Nevets is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 04:01 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets View Post
Yeah, I wasn't sure if a separate certificate was required because of scope issues.

But why Skywest and not ASA?

There may be some advantage with scope... I have no idea. But I very seriously doubt that Mesa brand will be on anything SkW does. Even if there was some small advantage in one or more areas.

As to SkW vs ASA, I'm referring to SkW, Inc. I have no idea if there are plans to grow the ASA brand, or not.

EDIT: SkW Airlines has the reduced training agreement, not ASA. So, that part of my discussion was about OO.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 04:06 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

3rd UPDATE: Mesa Air Files For Bankruptcy, Plans To Cut Jets

Looks like everything is peachy in PHX, they plan on getting out of BK within a few months. Again why is no one mentioning the fact that the majors have the option to get rid of Mesa? I guess they think it won't happen? And they keep saying Mesa is owed 70 million from DAL. Strange.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 04:24 PM
  #109  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
There may be some advantage with scope... I have no idea. But I very seriously doubt that Mesa brand will be on anything SkW does. Even if there was some small advantage in one or more areas.

As to SkW vs ASA, I'm referring to SkW, Inc. I have no idea if there are plans to grow the ASA brand, or not.

EDIT: SkW Airlines has the reduced training agreement, not ASA. So, that part of my discussion was about OO.
Having a third airline under the holding company doesn't mean having aircraft with the Mesa brand.

And yeah, I figured that Skywest Airlines got this training approval from the FAA and was hoping for an explanation as to why it wasn't ASA instead?
Nevets is offline  
Old 01-05-2010, 04:50 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 324
Default

Maybe I've missed it, but what about Delta scope? 76 seats last time I checked. I might be wrong, but aren't the Mesa CRJ900s at 86 seats? How could Skywest or any other Delta Connection carrier fly those airplanes without jeopardizing their codeshare?
Oskeewowow is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Groundhog
Mesa Airlines
77
12-17-2009 07:01 AM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
flycrj200
Regional
14
12-06-2008 10:23 AM
CRJPlt
Regional
93
12-03-2008 08:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices